Comparative efficiency of three selection methods in Dactylis glomerata L. and Agropyron cristatum L.

被引:8
作者
Abraham, EM [1 ]
Fasoulas, AC
机构
[1] Aristotelian Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Range Sci, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Aristotelian Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Genet & Plant Breeding, Thessaloniki, Greece
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S0021859601001265
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Two populations, one non-improved of Dactylis glomerata and one improved of Agropyron cristatum were selected in an isolated spaced plant environment (80 cm) by three selection procedures: (1) Mass honeycomb selection (MHS), (2) pedigree honeycomb selection (PHS) and (3) pedigree honeycomb selection-combined criterion (PHS-CC). The third procedure is a between-families selection based on increased family mean and reduced family coefficient of variation (CV). Response to selection assessed in sward trials in the first and second harvest year was effective for the three procedures, which ranked PHS-CC > PHS > MHS. Evaluation was based on consistent efficiency as measured by both cloned and half-sib families. The precision of assessing progeny performance under sward conditions on the basis of single plant evaluation in the isolation environment, increased with a reduction in competition among plants, the use of moving-ring selection, and the application of high selection pressures (1.6%). The efficiency of selection between unimproved families increased when families were selected concurrently for high family mean and reduced family coefficient of variation.
引用
收藏
页码:173 / 178
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   THEORY AND APPLICATION OF OPEN-POLLINATION AND POLYCROSS IN FORAGE GRASS BREEDING [J].
AASTVEIT, AH ;
AASTVEIT, K .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1990, 79 (05) :618-624
[2]  
ABRAHAM EM, 1997, BREEDING MULTIFUNCTI, P27
[3]  
[Anonymous], PLANT BREEDING REV
[4]   HONEY: A microcomputer program for plant selection and analyses of the honeycomb designs [J].
Batzios, DP ;
Roupakias, DG .
CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (03) :744-747
[5]   RECURRENT PHENOTYPIC SELECTION FOR FORAGE YIELD IN RYE [J].
BRUCKNER, PL ;
RAYMER, PL ;
BURTON, GW .
EUPHYTICA, 1991, 54 (01) :11-17
[6]  
BURTON GW, 1992, PLANT BREED REV, V9, P101, DOI DOI 10.1002/9780470650363.CH5
[7]   DIVERGENT PHENOTYPIC SELECTION RESPONSE IN SMOOTH BROMEGRASS FOR FORAGE YIELD AND NUTRITIVE-VALUE [J].
CARPENTER, JA ;
CASLER, MD .
CROP SCIENCE, 1990, 30 (01) :17-22
[8]   Convergent-divergent selection for seed production and forage traits in orchardgrass .1. Direct selection responses [J].
Casler, MD ;
Carlson, IT ;
Berg, CC ;
Sleper, DA ;
Barker, RE .
CROP SCIENCE, 1997, 37 (04) :1047-1053
[9]   PREDICTING FORAGE YIELD FROM MORPHOLOGICAL TRAITS IN REED CANARYGRASS [J].
CASLER, MD ;
HOVIN, AW .
CROP SCIENCE, 1985, 25 (05) :783-787
[10]   GENETIC-IMPROVEMENT IN AGRONOMIC TRAITS OF HARD RED WINTER-WHEAT CULTIVARS FROM 1919 TO 1987 [J].
COX, TS ;
SHROYER, JP ;
LIU, BH ;
SEARS, RG ;
MARTIN, TJ .
CROP SCIENCE, 1988, 28 (05) :756-760