Does terrestrial drought explain global CO2 flux anomalies induced by El Nino?

被引:27
|
作者
Schwalm, C. R. [1 ]
Williams, C. A. [1 ]
Schaefer, K. [2 ]
Baker, I. [3 ]
Collatz, G. J. [4 ]
Roedenbeck, C. [5 ]
机构
[1] Clark Univ, Grad Sch Geog, Worcester, MA 01610 USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Natl Snow & Ice Data Ctr, Cooperat Inst Res Environm Sci, Boulder, CO 80309 USA
[3] Colorado State Univ, Dept Atmospher Sci, Ft Collins, CO 80523 USA
[4] NASA, Goddard Space Flight Ctr, Hydrospher & Biospher Sci Lab, Greenbelt, MD 20771 USA
[5] Max Planck Inst Biogeochem, D-07701 Jena, Germany
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
FORESTS GREEN-UP; ATMOSPHERIC CO2; CARBON-CYCLE; COMBINING MODIS; SOUTHERN OSCILLATION; AMAZON FORESTS; AMERIFLUX DATA; CLIMATE; LAND; ENSO;
D O I
10.5194/bg-8-2493-2011
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The El Nino Southern Oscillation is the dominant year-to-year mode of global climate variability. El Nino effects on terrestrial carbon cycling are mediated by associated climate anomalies, primarily drought, influencing fire emissions and biotic net ecosystem exchange (NEE). Here we evaluate whether El Nino produces a consistent response from the global carbon cycle. We apply a novel bottom-up approach to estimating global NEE anomalies based on FLUXNET data using land cover maps and weather reanalysis. We analyze 13 years (1997-2009) of globally gridded observational NEE anomalies derived from eddy covariance flux data, remotely-sensed fire emissions at the monthly time step, and NEE estimated from an atmospheric transport inversion. We evaluate the overall consistency of biospheric response to El Nino and, more generally, the link between global CO2 flux anomalies and El Nino-induced drought. Our findings, which are robust relative to uncertainty in both methods and time-lags in response, indicate that each event has a different spatial signature with only limited spatial coherence in Amazonia, Australia and southern Africa. For most regions, the sign of response changed across El Nino events. Biotic NEE anomalies, across 5 El Nino events, ranged from -1.34 to +0.98 Pg C yr(-1), whereas fire emissions anomalies were generally smaller in magnitude (ranging from -0.49 to +0.53 Pg C yr(-1)). Overall drought does not appear to impose consistent terrestrial CO2 flux anomalies during El Ninos, finding large variation in globally integrated responses from -1.15 to +0.49 Pg C yr(-1). Despite the significant correlation between the CO2 flux and El Nino indices, we find that El Nino events have, when globally integrated, both enhanced and weakened terrestrial sink strength, with no consistent response across events.
引用
收藏
页码:2493 / 2506
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Global change belowground: impacts of elevated CO2, nitrogen, and summer drought on soil food webs and biodiversity
    Eisenhauer, Nico
    Cesarz, Simone
    Koller, Robert
    Worm, Kally
    Reich, Peter B.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2012, 18 (02) : 435 - 447
  • [42] Shifts in microbial trophic strategy explain different temperature sensitivity of CO2 flux under constant and diurnally varying temperature regimes
    Bai, Zhen
    Xie, Hongtu
    Kao-Kniffin, Jenny
    Chen, Baodong
    Shao, Pengshuai
    Liang, Chao
    FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY, 2017, 93 (05)
  • [43] Trends in pCO2 and sea–air CO2 flux over the global open oceans for the last two decades
    Yosuke Iida
    Atsushi Kojima
    Yusuke Takatani
    Toshiya Nakano
    Hiroyuki Sugimoto
    Takashi Midorikawa
    Masao Ishii
    Journal of Oceanography, 2015, 71 : 637 - 661
  • [44] Trends in pCO2 and sea-air CO2 flux over the global open oceans for the last two decades
    Iida, Yosuke
    Kojima, Atsushi
    Takatani, Yusuke
    Nakano, Toshiya
    Sugimoto, Hiroyuki
    Midorikawa, Takashi
    Ishii, Masao
    JOURNAL OF OCEANOGRAPHY, 2015, 71 (06) : 637 - 661
  • [45] Old-growth CO2 flux measurements reveal high sensitivity to climate anomalies across seasonal, annual and decadal time scales
    Wharton, S.
    Falk, M.
    Bible, K.
    Schroeder, M.
    Paw U, K. T.
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2012, 161 : 1 - 14
  • [46] How does the terrestrial carbon exchange respond to inter-annual climatic variations? A quantification based on atmospheric CO2 data
    Roedenbeck, Christian
    Zaehle, Soenke
    Keeling, Ralph
    Heimann, Martin
    BIOGEOSCIENCES, 2018, 15 (08) : 2481 - 2498
  • [47] Global surface-ocean pCO2 and sea-air CO2 flux variability from an observation-driven ocean mixed-layer scheme
    Roedenbeck, C.
    Keeling, R. F.
    Bakker, D. C. E.
    Metz, N.
    Olsen, A.
    Sabine, C.
    Heimann, M.
    OCEAN SCIENCE, 2013, 9 (02) : 193 - 216
  • [48] Dynamic global vegetation models underestimate net CO2 flux mean and inter-annual variability in dryland ecosystems
    MacBean, Natasha
    Scott, Russell L.
    Biederman, Joel A.
    Peylin, Philippe
    Kolb, Thomas
    Litvak, Marcy E.
    Krishnan, Praveena
    Meyers, Tilden P.
    Arora, Vivek K.
    Bastrikov, Vladislav
    Goll, Daniel
    Lombardozzi, Danica L.
    Nabel, Julia E. M. S.
    Pongratz, Julia
    Sitch, Stephen
    Walker, Anthony P.
    Zaehle, Sonke
    Moore, David J. P.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (09)
  • [49] Evaluating Global Atmospheric Inversions of Terrestrial Net Ecosystem Exchange CO2 Over North America on Seasonal and Sub-Continental Scales
    Cui, Yu Yan
    Zhang, Li
    Jacobson, Andrew R.
    Johnson, Matthew S.
    Philip, Sajeev
    Baker, David
    Chevallier, Frederic
    Schuh, Andrew E.
    Liu, Junjie
    Crowell, Sean
    Peiro, Helene E.
    Deng, Feng
    Basu, Sourish
    Davis, Kenneth J.
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2022, 49 (18)
  • [50] Does drought stress eliminate the benefit of elevated CO2 on soybean yield? Using an improved model to link crop and soil water relations
    Sun, Wenguang
    Fleisher, David
    Timlin, Dennis
    Ray, Chittaranjan
    Wang, Zhuangji
    Sahila, Beegum
    Reddy, Vangimalla
    AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2023, 343