Techno-economic and environmental analysis of bio-oil production from forest residues via non-catalytic and catalytic pyrolysis processes

被引:76
作者
van Schalkwyk, Dominique L. [1 ]
Mandegari, Mohsen [1 ]
Farzad, Somayeh [1 ]
Gorgens, Johann F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Proc Engn, Private Bag X1, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
关键词
Forest residues; Bio-oil; Biochar; Biorefinery; Techno-economic analysis; Life cycle assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; IN-SITU; BIOCHAR PROPERTIES; GREENHOUSE-GAS; AUGER REACTOR; BIOMASS; WOOD; TECHNOLOGIES; TORREFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112815
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Forest residues pose a fire risk as woody biomass remaining in forests after thinning or clear-felling. Instead of infield burning, forest residues can be converted into products such as bio-oil and biochar through pyrolysis. In situ catalytic pyrolysis can be implemented to upgrade bio-oil for co-processing with Vacuum Gas Oil (VGO). In this study, process simulations were developed in Aspen Plus (R) for non-catalytic and catalytic pyrolysis to investigate the economic feasibility of bio-oil production for co-processing 5 wt% crude or 10 wt% upgraded bio-oil, and considering 100, 200 and 300 km biomass collection radii. The Minimum Selling Price (MSP) of bio-oil (22% IRR) for co-processing was $1.09/L (crude) and $1.46/L (upgraded), respectively. However, economy-of-scale showed a clear benefit as the lowest MSP of bio-oil was $0.75/L (crude) and $1.35/L (upgraded) at 300 km. Furthermore, the MSP of bio-oil decreased to $0.71/L (crude) and $1.25/L (upgraded) at 300 km for improved bio-oil and biochar product recovery as evaluated through the process sensitivity analysis. Life Cycle Assessment results for Global Warming Potential (GWP(100)) of bio-oil production corresponded to -0.30 (crude) and -0.14 (upgraded) kg CO(2)eq/MJ, while GWP(100) of VGO production ranged from 0.0052 (crude-oil) to 0.013 (diesel) kg CO(2)eq/MJ.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [11] Carey P, 2006, CORNELL COOP EXT 200
  • [12] Pyrolysis of forest residues: An approach to techno-economics, for bio-fuel production
    Carrasco, Jose L.
    Gunukula, Sampath
    Boateng, Akwasi A.
    Mullen, Charles A.
    DeSisto, William J.
    Wheeler, M. Clayton
    [J]. FUEL, 2017, 193 : 477 - 484
  • [13] Production of low oxygen bio-oil via catalytic pyrolysis of forest residues in a kilogram-scale rotary kiln reactor
    Chireshe, Farai
    Collard, Francois-Xavier
    Gorgens, Johann F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 260
  • [14] Enthalpy for pyrolysis for several types of biomass
    Daugaard, DE
    Brown, RC
    [J]. ENERGY & FUELS, 2003, 17 (04) : 934 - 939
  • [15] Design and operation of a pilot-scale catalytic biomass pyrolysis unit
    Dayton, David C.
    Carpenter, John R.
    Kataria, Atish
    Peters, Jonathan E.
    Barbee, David
    Mante, Ofei D.
    Gupta, Raghubir
    [J]. GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2015, 17 (09) : 4680 - 4689
  • [16] Recent advances on the production and utilization trends of bio-fuels: A global perspective
    Demirbas, M. F.
    Balat, Mustafa
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 47 (15-16) : 2371 - 2381
  • [17] Department of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries, 2018, GUID MACH COSTS 2015
  • [18] Assessment of the thermodynamic performance improvement of a typical sugar mill through the integration of waste-heat recovery technologies
    Dogbe, Eunice Sefakor
    Mandegari, Mohsen
    Gorgens, Johann F.
    [J]. APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2019, 158
  • [19] Estimating biomass and macronutrient content of some commercially important plantation species in South Africa
    Dovey, S. B.
    [J]. SOUTHERN FORESTS-A JOURNAL OF FOREST SCIENCE, 2009, 71 (03) : 245 - 251
  • [20] Dutta A, 2015, NRELTP510062455, DOI [10.2172/1215007, DOI 10.2172/1215007]