Techno-economic and environmental analysis of bio-oil production from forest residues via non-catalytic and catalytic pyrolysis processes

被引:76
作者
van Schalkwyk, Dominique L. [1 ]
Mandegari, Mohsen [1 ]
Farzad, Somayeh [1 ]
Gorgens, Johann F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Proc Engn, Private Bag X1, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
关键词
Forest residues; Bio-oil; Biochar; Biorefinery; Techno-economic analysis; Life cycle assessment; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; TRANSPORTATION FUELS; IN-SITU; BIOCHAR PROPERTIES; GREENHOUSE-GAS; AUGER REACTOR; BIOMASS; WOOD; TECHNOLOGIES; TORREFACTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112815
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Forest residues pose a fire risk as woody biomass remaining in forests after thinning or clear-felling. Instead of infield burning, forest residues can be converted into products such as bio-oil and biochar through pyrolysis. In situ catalytic pyrolysis can be implemented to upgrade bio-oil for co-processing with Vacuum Gas Oil (VGO). In this study, process simulations were developed in Aspen Plus (R) for non-catalytic and catalytic pyrolysis to investigate the economic feasibility of bio-oil production for co-processing 5 wt% crude or 10 wt% upgraded bio-oil, and considering 100, 200 and 300 km biomass collection radii. The Minimum Selling Price (MSP) of bio-oil (22% IRR) for co-processing was $1.09/L (crude) and $1.46/L (upgraded), respectively. However, economy-of-scale showed a clear benefit as the lowest MSP of bio-oil was $0.75/L (crude) and $1.35/L (upgraded) at 300 km. Furthermore, the MSP of bio-oil decreased to $0.71/L (crude) and $1.25/L (upgraded) at 300 km for improved bio-oil and biochar product recovery as evaluated through the process sensitivity analysis. Life Cycle Assessment results for Global Warming Potential (GWP(100)) of bio-oil production corresponded to -0.30 (crude) and -0.14 (upgraded) kg CO(2)eq/MJ, while GWP(100) of VGO production ranged from 0.0052 (crude-oil) to 0.013 (diesel) kg CO(2)eq/MJ.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 89 条
  • [1] Ackerman P, 2013, I COMMER FOR RES
  • [2] Modeling of integrated processes for the recovery of the energetic content of sugar cane bagasse
    Adeniyi, Adewale G.
    Ighalo, Joshua O.
    Abdulsalam, Abdulmaliq
    [J]. BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2019, 13 (04): : 1057 - 1067
  • [3] The role of biochar and biochar-compost in improving soil quality and crop performance: A review
    Agegnehu, Getachew
    Srivastava, A. K.
    Bird, Michael I.
    [J]. APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2017, 119 : 156 - 170
  • [4] Techno-economic comparison of biomass-to-transportation fuels via pyrolysis, gasification, and biochemical pathways
    Anex, Robert P.
    Aden, Andy
    Kazi, Feroz Kabir
    Fortman, Joshua
    Swanson, Ryan M.
    Wright, Mark M.
    Satrio, Justinus A.
    Brown, Robert C.
    Daugaard, Daren E.
    Platon, Alex
    Kothandaraman, Geetha
    Hsu, David D.
    Dutta, Abhijit
    [J]. FUEL, 2010, 89 : S29 - S35
  • [5] [Anonymous], SIMAPRO LIF CYCL ASS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2016, HYDROPROCESSING HYDR
  • [7] Aspen Technology Inc, 2019, ASP PLUS V8 8
  • [8] Pyrolysis of switchgrass in an auger reactor for biochar production: A greenhouse gas and energy impacts assessment
    Brassard, Patrick
    Godbout, Stephane
    Pelletier, Frederic
    Raghavan, Vijaya
    Palacios, Joahnn H.
    [J]. BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2018, 116 : 99 - 105
  • [9] Upgrading Biomass Fast Pyrolysis Liquids
    Bridgwater, Anthony V.
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2012, 31 (02) : 261 - 268
  • [10] A techno-economic analysis of using mobile distributed pyrolysis facilities to deliver a forest residue resource
    Brown, Duncan
    Rowe, Andrew
    Wild, Peter
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 150 : 367 - 376