Comparative Study of Forecasting Schemes for IoT Device Traffic in Machine-to-Machine Communication

被引:14
|
作者
Nakip, Mert [1 ]
Gul, Baran Can [1 ]
Rodoplu, Volkan [1 ]
Guzelis, Cuneyt [1 ]
机构
[1] Yasar Univ, PO 35100, Izmir, Turkey
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
massive access; forecasting; machine learning; prediction; IoT; Machine-to-Machine Communication (M2M); ACCESS;
D O I
10.1145/3361821.3361833
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
We present a comparative study of Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), 1-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (1-D CNN), and Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) models on the problem of forecasting the traffic generation patterns of individual Internet of Things (IoT) devices in Machine-to-Machine (M2M) communication. We classify IoT traffic into four classes: Fixed-Bit Periodic (FBP), Variable-Bit Periodic (VBP), Fixed-Bit Aperiodic (FBA), and Variable-Bit Aperiodic (VBA). We show that LSTM outperforms all of the other models significantly in the symmetric Mean Absolute Percentage Error (sMAPE) measure for devices in the VBP class in our simulations. Furthermore, we show that LSTM has almost the same performance in this metric for the FBA class as MLP and 1-D CNN. While the training time per IoT device is the highest for LSTM, all of the forecasting models have reasonable training times for practical implementation. Our results suggest an architecture in which an IoT Gateway predicts the future traffic of IoT devices in the FBP, VBP and FBA classes and pre-allocates the uplink wireless channel for these classes in advance in order to alleviate the Massive Access Problem of M2M communication.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 109
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] ALOHA-NOMA for Massive Machine-to-Machine IoT Communication
    Balevi, Eren
    Al Rabee, Faeik T.
    Gitlin, Richard D.
    2018 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNICATIONS (ICC), 2018,
  • [2] Access Control Schemes for Machine to Machine Communication in IoT: Comparative Analysis and Discussion
    Railkar, Poonam N.
    Mahalle, Parikshit N.
    Shinde, Gitanjali R.
    2018 2ND IEEE GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMPUTING AND NETWORKING (GCWCN - 2018), VOL II, 2018, : 59 - 63
  • [3] Machine-to-Machine Communication
    Weyrich, Michael
    Schmidt, Jan-Philipp
    Ebert, Christof
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 2014, 31 (04) : 19 - 23
  • [4] Wireless Machine-to-Machine Communication
    Beale, Martin
    Morioka, Yuichi
    2011 41ST EUROPEAN MICROWAVE CONFERENCE, 2011, : 115 - 118
  • [5] Machine-to-Machine communication in LTE-A
    Chen, Yu
    Wang, Wei
    2010 IEEE 72ND VEHICULAR TECHNOLOGY CONFERENCE FALL, 2010,
  • [6] Machine-to-Machine Communication: An Overview of Opportunities
    Amodu, Oluwatosin Ahmed
    Othman, Mohamed
    COMPUTER NETWORKS, 2018, 145 : 255 - 276
  • [7] Group communication in machine-to-machine environments
    Riker, André (ariker@dei.uc.pt), 1600, Springer Verlag (8611):
  • [8] Recent Developments in Authentication Schemes Used in Machine-Type Communication Devices in Machine-to-Machine Communication: Issues and Challenges
    Ullah, Shafi
    Bazai, Sibghat Ullah
    Imran, Mohammad
    Ilyas, Qazi Mudassar
    Mehmood, Abid
    Saleem, Muhammad Asim
    Rafique, Muhmmad Aasim
    Haider, Arsalan
    Khan, Ilyas
    Iqbal, Sajid
    Gulzar, Yonis
    Hameed, Kauser
    CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2024, 79 (01): : 93 - 115
  • [9] Machine-to-machine: an emerging communication paradigm
    Anton-Haro, Carles
    Lestable, Thierry
    Lin, Yonghua
    Nikaein, Navid
    Watteyne, Thomas
    Alonso-Zarate, Jesus
    TRANSACTIONS ON EMERGING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, 24 (04): : 353 - 354
  • [10] Impact of Machine-to-Machine Traffic on LTE Data Traffic Performance
    Mehmood, Yasir
    Poetsch, Thomas
    Marwat, Safdar Nawaz Khan
    Ahmad, Farhan
    Goerg, Carmelita
    Rashid, Imran
    DYNAMICS IN LOGISTICS, LDIC, 2014, 2016, : 259 - 269