Effects of Tissue Handling on RNA Integrity and Microarray Measurements From Resected Breast Cancers

被引:95
作者
Hatzis, Christos [5 ]
Sun, Hongxia [1 ]
Yao, Hui [1 ,2 ]
Hubbard, Rebekah E. [1 ]
Meric-Bernstam, Funda [3 ]
Babiera, Gildy V. [3 ]
Wu, Yun [1 ]
Pusztai, Lajos [4 ]
Symmans, W. Fraser [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Surg Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Breast Med Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[5] Nuvera Biosci, Woburn, MA USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2011年 / 103卷 / 24期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
GENE-EXPRESSION ASSAYS; MOLECULAR SUBTYPES; ISCHEMIA TIME; PROSTATECTOMY; CHEMOTHERAPY; PREDICTORS; CARCINOMAS; SPECIMENS; PATTERNS; QUALITY;
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djr438
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Reliable stability and yield of RNA from breast cancer tissues are important for biobanking, clinical trials, and diagnostic testing. Methods Aliquots of fresh primary tumor tissue from 17 surgically resected invasive breast cancers were placed into RNAlater at room temperature after tumor removal (baseline) and up to 3 hours thereafter or were snap frozen at baseline and 40 minutes thereafter. Samples were stored at 280 C until gene expression profiling with Affymetrix Human Gene U133A microarrays. We evaluated the effects of cold ischemic time (the time from tumor specimen removal to sample preservation) and sample preservation method on RNA yield, Bioanalyzer-based RNA integrity number, microarray-based 3'/5' expression ratios for assessing transcript integrity, and microarray-based measurement of single-gene and multigene expression signatures. The statistical significance of the effects was assessed using linear mixed effects regression models. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results Sample preservation in RNAlater statistically significantly improved RNA integrity compared with snap freezing as assessed by the RNA integrity number, which increased from 7.31 to 8.13 units (difference = 0.82 units, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.53 to 1.11 units, P < .001), and RNA yield, which increased threefold from 8.9 to 28.6 mu g (difference = 19.7 mu g, 95% CI = 14.1 to 25.3 mu g, P < .001). Prolonged cold ischemic delay at room temperature before sample stabilization decreased the RNA integrity number by 0.12 units/h (95% CI = 0.02 to 0.23 units/h) compared with a projected average RNA integrity number of 7.39 if no delays were present (P = .008) and decreased the RNA yield by 1.5 mu g/h (95% CI = 0 to 4 mu g/h) from a baseline mean RNA yield of 33.5 mu g if no delays were present (P = .019). Prolonged cold ischemia statistically significantly increased the 3'/5' ratio of control gene transcripts, particularly of STAT1 (P < .001). Snap freezing statistically significantly increased the 3'/5' ratio of three control transcripts (ACTB, GAPDH, and 18S rRNA). Expression levels of single genes and multigene signatures for breast cancer were largely unaffected by sample preservation method or cold ischemia. Conclusions Sample preservation in RNAlater improves RNA yield and quality, whereas cold ischemia increases RNA fragmentation as measured by the 3'/5' expression ratio of control genes. However, expression levels of single genes and multigene signatures that are of diagnostic relevance in breast cancer were mostly unaffected by sample preservation method or prolonged cold ischemic duration.
引用
收藏
页码:1871 / 1883
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Technology Insight: tuning into the genetic orchestra using microarrays - limitations of DNA microarrays in clinical practice [J].
Abdullah-Sayani, Arnbreen ;
Bueno-de-Mesquita, Jolien M. ;
van de Vijver, Marc J. .
NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE ONCOLOGY, 2006, 3 (09) :501-516
[2]  
*AFF, 2004, GEN CHIP EXPR AN DAT
[3]  
Affymetrix, 2004, GENECHIP EXPR AN TEC
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2009, LME4 LINEAR MIXED EF
[6]   Sources of variability and effect of experimental approach on expression profiling data interpretation [J].
Bakay, M ;
Chen, YW ;
Borup, R ;
Zhao, P ;
Nagaraju, K ;
Hoffman, EP .
BMC BIOINFORMATICS, 2002, 3 (1)
[7]   Intratumor Heterogeneity and Precision of Microarray-Based Predictors of Breast Cancer Biology and Clinical Outcome [J].
Barry, William T. ;
Kernagis, Dawn N. ;
Dressman, Holly K. ;
Griffis, Ryan J. ;
Hunter, J'Vonne D. ;
Olson, John A. ;
Marks, Jeff R. ;
Ginsburg, Geoffrey S. ;
Marcom, Paul K. ;
Nevins, Joseph R. ;
Geradts, Joseph ;
Datto, Michael B. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 28 (13) :2198-2206
[8]  
Bates D., 2009, Mixed-Effects Models in S and S-PLUS
[9]   Stability and heterogeneity of expression profiles in lung cancer specimens harvested following surgical resection [J].
Blackhall, FH ;
Pintilie, M ;
Wigle, DA ;
Jurisica, I ;
Liu, N ;
Radulovich, N ;
Johnston, MR ;
Keshavjee, S ;
Tsao, MS .
NEOPLASIA, 2004, 6 (06) :761-767
[10]   Evaluation of DNA microarray results with quantitative gene expression platforms [J].
Canales, Roger D. ;
Luo, Yuling ;
Willey, James C. ;
Austermiller, Bradley ;
Barbacioru, Catalin C. ;
Boysen, Cecilie ;
Hunkapiller, Kathryn ;
Jensen, Roderick V. ;
Knight, Charles R. ;
Lee, Kathleen Y. ;
Ma, Yunqing ;
Maqsodi, Botoul ;
Papallo, Adam ;
Peters, Elizabeth Herness ;
Poulter, Karen ;
Ruppel, Patricia L. ;
Samaha, Raymond R. ;
Shi, Leming ;
Yang, Wen ;
Zhang, Lu ;
Goodsaid, Federico M. .
NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2006, 24 (09) :1115-1122