Assessment and minimization of contralateral breast dose for conventional and intensity modulated breast radiotherapy

被引:25
|
作者
Burmeister, Jay [1 ,2 ]
Alvarado, Nicole [1 ,2 ]
Way, Sarah [1 ,2 ]
McDermott, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Bossenberger, Todd [1 ,2 ]
Jaenisch, Harriett [1 ,2 ]
Patel, Rajiv [1 ,2 ]
Washington, Tara [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Gershenson Radiat Oncol Ctr, Karmanos Canc Inst, Detroit, MI 48201 USA
[2] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
关键词
breast radiotherapy; breast IMRT; contralateral breast dose; contralateral breast cancer;
D O I
10.1016/j.meddos.2007.04.003
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Breast radiotherapy is associated with an increased risk of contralateral breast cancer (CBC) in women under age 45 at the time of treatment. This risk increases with increasing absorbed dose to the contralateral breast. The use of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) is expected to substantially reduce the dose to the contralateral breast by eliminating scattered radiation from physical beam modifiers. The absorbed dose to the contralateral breast was measured for 5 common radiotherapy techniques, including paired 15 degrees wedges, lateral 30 degrees wedge only, custom-designed physical compensators, aperture based (field-within-field) IMRT with segments chosen by the planner, and inverse planned IMRT with segments chosen by a leaf sequencing algorithm after dose volume histogram (DVH)-based fluence map optimization. Further reduction in contralateral breast dose through the use of lead shielding was also investigated. While shielding was observed to have the most profound impact on surface dose, the radiotherapy technique proved to be most important in determining internal dose. Paired wedges or compensators result in the highest contralateral breast doses (nearly 10% of the prescription dose on the media] surface), while use of IMRT or removal of the medial wedge results in significantly lower doses. Aperture-based IMRT results in the lowest internal doses, primarily due to the decrease in the number of monitor units required and the associated reduction in leakage dose. The use of aperture-based IMRT reduced the average dose to the contralateral breast by greater than 50% in comparison to wedges or compensators. Combined use of IMRT and 1/8-inch-thick lead shielding reduced the dose to the interior and surface of the contralateral breast by roughly 60% and 85%, respectively. This reduction may warrant the use of IMRT for younger patients who have a statistically significant risk of contralateral breast cancer associated with breast radiotherapy. (c) 2008 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 13
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Dose-dependent effect of mammographic breast density on the risk of contralateral breast cancer
    Chowdhury, Marzana
    Euhus, David
    O'Donnell, Maureen
    Onega, Tracy
    Choudhary, Pankaj K.
    Biswas, Swati
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 170 (01) : 143 - 148
  • [22] Dose-dependent effect of mammographic breast density on the risk of contralateral breast cancer
    Marzana Chowdhury
    David Euhus
    Maureen O’Donnell
    Tracy Onega
    Pankaj K. Choudhary
    Swati Biswas
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2018, 170 : 143 - 148
  • [23] CONTRALATERAL BREAST DOSE AFTER WHOLE-BREAST IRRADIATION: AN ANALYSIS BY TREATMENT TECHNIQUE
    Williams, Terence M.
    Moran, Jean M.
    Hsu, Shu-Hui
    Marsh, Robin
    Yanke, Beth
    Fraass, Benedick A.
    Pierce, Lori J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2012, 82 (05): : 2079 - 2085
  • [24] Inter-fraction motion and dosimetric consequences during breast intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT)
    Jain, Popja
    Marchant, Tom
    Green, Melanie
    Watkins, Gillian
    Davies, Julie
    McCarthy, Claire
    Loncaster, Juliette
    Stewart, Alan
    Magee, Brian
    Moore, Christopher
    Price, Pat
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 90 (01) : 93 - 98
  • [25] Contralateral breast doses following radiotherapy of the breast and regional lymph nodes: Measurements and treatment planning calculations
    Johansen, Safora
    Olsen, Dag Rune
    Danielsen, Turi
    Malinen, Eirik
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2007, 82 (03) : 332 - 336
  • [26] Evaluation of Fetal Dose in Breast Radiotherapy With Shielding and Wedges
    Filipov, D.
    Schelin, H. R.
    Soboll, D. S.
    Denyak, V.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NUCLEAR SCIENCE, 2013, 60 (02) : 792 - 796
  • [27] Exploring Impact of Dose Deposition and Breast Composition on Acute Breast Oedema after Radiotherapy
    Jaikuna, Tanwiwat
    Azria, David
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    De Santis, Maria Carmen
    Gutierrez-Enriquez, Sara
    van Herk, Marcel
    Hoskin, Peter
    Lambrecht, Maarten
    Seibold, Petra
    Seoane, Alejandro
    Sperk, Elena
    Symonds, R. Paul
    Talbot, Christopher J.
    Rancati, Tiziana
    Rattay, Tim
    Reyes, Victoria
    Rosenstein, Barry S.
    de Ruysscher, Dirk
    Vega, Ana
    Veldeman, Liv
    Webb, Adam
    West, Catharine M. L.
    Osorio, Eliana Vasquez
    Aznar, Marianne C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 197 : S350 - S351
  • [28] THE EFFECT OF A DYNAMIC WEDGE IN THE MEDIAL TANGENTIAL FIELD UPON THE CONTRALATERAL BREAST DOSE
    MCPARLAND, BJ
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1990, 19 (06): : 1515 - 1520
  • [29] Incidence of contralateral breast cancer in Japanese patients with unilateral minimum-risk primary breast cancer, and the benefits of endocrine therapy and radiotherapy
    Tomohiko Aihara
    Shiro Tanaka
    Yasuaki Sagara
    Hiroji Iwata
    Yasuo Hozumi
    Hiroyuki Takei
    Hiroshi Yamaguchi
    Makoto Ishitobi
    Chiyomi Egawa
    Breast Cancer, 2014, 21 : 284 - 291
  • [30] Incidence of contralateral breast cancer in Japanese patients with unilateral minimum-risk primary breast cancer, and the benefits of endocrine therapy and radiotherapy
    Aihara, Tomohiko
    Tanaka, Shiro
    Sagara, Yasuaki
    Iwata, Hiroji
    Hozumi, Yasuo
    Takei, Hiroyuki
    Yamaguchi, Hiroshi
    Ishitobi, Makoto
    Egawa, Chiyomi
    BREAST CANCER, 2014, 21 (03) : 284 - 291