This paper presents a comparison between various control strategies for a class of mechanical actuators common in heavy-duty industry. Typical actuator components are hydraulic or pneumatic elements with static nonlinearities, which are commonly referred to as Hammerstein systems. Such static nonlinearities may vary in time as a function of the load and hence classical inverse-model based control strategies may deliver sub-optimal performance. This paper investigates the ability of classical linear control strategies as lead, P, PI and PID control to satisfy tolerance interval for position error values, overshoot and settling time specifications. Due to the presence of static nonlinearity, control effort is also evaluated in terms of zero crossing frequency (up-down or left-right movement). Simulation and experimental data from a lab setup suggest that advanced control strategies may be needed to improve global performance parameters.