Plant traits that predict resistance to herbivores

被引:409
作者
Carmona, Diego [1 ]
Lajeunesse, Marc J. [2 ]
Johnson, Marc T. J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ecol, Dept Ecol Evolut, Lab Interacc Planta Anim, Mexico City 04510, DF, Mexico
[2] Natl Evolutionary Synth Ctr, Durham, NC 27705 USA
[3] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Plant Biol, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
antibiosis; co-evolution; genetic covariance; plant defence; plant resistance; plant-insect; secondary chemistry; SECONDARY METABOLITES; NATURAL-SELECTION; COMMON MILKWEED; DEFENSE; EVOLUTION; METAANALYSIS; ESCALATION; ECOLOGY; SPECIALIZATION; AVAILABILITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2435.2010.01794.x
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
P>1. Although secondary metabolites are recognized as fundamental to the defence of plants against insect and mammalian herbivores, their relative importance compared to other potential defensive plant traits (e.g. physical resistance, gross morphology, life-history, primary chemistry and physiology) are not well understood. 2. We conducted a meta-analysis to answer the question: What types of genetically variable plant traits most strongly predict resistance against herbivores? We performed a comprehensive literature search and obtained 499 separate measurements of the strength of covariation (measured as genetic correlations) between plant traits and herbivore susceptibility - these were extracted from 72 studies involving 19 plant families. 3. Surprisingly, we found no overall association between the concentrations of secondary metabolites and herbivore susceptibility - plant traits other than secondary metabolites most strongly predicted herbivore susceptibility. Specifically, genetic variation in life-history traits (e.g. flowering time, growth rate) consistently exhibited the strongest genetic correlations with susceptibility. Genetic variation in gross morphological traits (e.g. no. branches, plant size) and physical resistance traits (e.g. latex, trichomes) were also frequently correlated with variation in herbivore susceptibility, but these relationships depended on attributes of the herbivores (e.g. feeding guild) and plants (e.g. longevity). 4. These results call into question the conventional wisdom that secondary metabolites are the most important anti-herbivore defence of plants. We propose the hypothesis that herbivores select most strongly on genetic variation in life-history, morphological and physical resistance traits, but the greater pleiotropic effects of genes controlling these traits impose strong constraints on their evolution. Meanwhile, secondary metabolites could have evolved to be important defensive mechanisms not because they have the largest effect on herbivores, but because the constraints on their evolution are the weakest.
引用
收藏
页码:358 / 367
页数:10
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [1] Adams DC, 1997, ECOLOGY, V78, P1277, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(1997)078[1277:RTFMAO]2.0.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] Agrawal AA, 2005, EVOL ECOL RES, V7, P651
  • [4] Plant defense and density dependence in the population growth of herbivores
    Agrawal, AA
    [J]. AMERICAN NATURALIST, 2004, 164 (01) : 113 - 120
  • [5] Polymorphism in plant defense against herbivory:: Constitutive and induced resistance in Cucumis sativus
    Agrawal, AA
    Gorski, PM
    Tallamy, DW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 1999, 25 (10) : 2285 - 2304
  • [6] Phylogenetic escalation and decline of plant defense strategies
    Agrawal, Anurag A.
    Fishbein, Mark
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2008, 105 (29) : 10057 - 10060
  • [7] Macroevolution of plant defense strategies
    Agrawal, Anurag A.
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2007, 22 (02) : 103 - 109
  • [8] Agrawal AA, 2006, ECOLOGY, V87, pS132, DOI 10.1890/0012-9658(2006)87[132:PDS]2.0.CO
  • [9] 2
  • [10] Phylogenetic ecology of leaf surface traits in the milkweeds (Asclepias spp.): chemistry, ecophysiology, and insect behavior
    Agrawal, Anurag A.
    Fishbein, Mark
    Jetter, Reinhard
    Salminen, Juha-Pekka
    Goldstein, Jessica B.
    Freitag, Amy E.
    Sparks, Jed P.
    [J]. NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 2009, 183 (03) : 848 - 867