Comparing, optimizing, and benchmarking quantum-control algorithms in a unifying programming framework

被引:189
作者
Machnes, S. [1 ,2 ]
Sander, U. [3 ]
Glaser, S. J. [3 ]
de Fouquieres, P. [4 ]
Gruslys, A. [4 ]
Schirmer, S. [4 ]
Schulte-Herbrueggen, T. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Phys, Quantum Grp, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Univ Ulm, Inst Theoret Phys, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Chem, D-85747 Garching, Germany
[4] Univ Cambridge, Dept Appl Math & Theoret Phys, Cambridge CB3 0WA, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
QUASI-NEWTON MATRICES; PARAMETER-DIFFERENTIATION; STATE TRANSFER; DYNAMICS; CONTROLLABILITY; EFFICIENT; PERFECT; SYSTEMS; COMPUTE; PHYSICS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.84.022305
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
For paving the way to novel applications in quantum simulation, computation, and technology, increasingly large quantum systems have to be steered with high precision. It is a typical task amenable to numerical optimal control to turn the time course of pulses, i.e., piecewise constant control amplitudes, iteratively into an optimized shape. Here, we present a comparative study of optimal-control algorithms for a wide range of finite-dimensional applications. We focus on the most commonly used algorithms: GRAPE methods which update all controls concurrently, and Krotov-type methods which do so sequentially. Guidelines for their use are given and open research questions are pointed out. Moreover, we introduce a unifying algorithmic framework, DYNAMO (dynamic optimization platform), designed to provide the quantum-technology community with a convenient MATLAB-based tool set for optimal control. In addition, it gives researchers in optimal-control techniques a framework for benchmarking and comparing newly proposed algorithms with the state of the art. It allows a mix-and-match approach with various types of gradients, update and step-size methods as well as subspace choices. Open-source code including examples is made available at http://qlib.info.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 96 条
[2]   Notions of controllability for bilinear multilevel quantum systems [J].
Albertini, F ;
D'Alessandro, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2003, 48 (08) :1399-1403
[3]   OPTIMAL CONTROL-THEORY [J].
BERKOVITZ, LD .
AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL MONTHLY, 1976, 83 (04) :225-239
[4]   Entangled states of trapped atomic ions [J].
Blatt, Rainer ;
Wineland, David .
NATURE, 2008, 453 (7198) :1008-1015
[5]  
Bliss E. B., 1946, LECT CALCULUS VARIAT
[6]   Many-body physics with ultracold gases [J].
Bloch, Immanuel ;
Dalibard, Jean ;
Zwerger, Wilhelm .
REVIEWS OF MODERN PHYSICS, 2008, 80 (03) :885-964
[7]   Quantum communication through an unmodulated spin chain [J].
Bose, S .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2003, 91 (20)
[8]   Quantum communication through spin chain dynamics: an introductory overview [J].
Bose, Sougato .
CONTEMPORARY PHYSICS, 2007, 48 (01) :13-30
[9]   Perfect quantum state transfer with randomly coupled quantum chains [J].
Burgarth, D ;
Bose, S .
NEW JOURNAL OF PHYSICS, 2005, 7
[10]  
BUTKOVSKII AG, 1979, AUTOMAT REM CONTR+, V40, P485