Polymatching algorithm in observational studies with multiple treatment groups

被引:1
作者
Nattino, Giovanni [1 ]
Song, Chi [2 ]
Lu, Bo [2 ]
机构
[1] Ist Ric Farmacol Mario Negri IRCCS, Via GB Camozzi 3, I-24020 Ranica, BG, Italy
[2] Ohio State Univ, Div Biostat, Coll Publ Hlth, 1841 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Polymatching; Multiple treatment groups; Polynomial-time algorithm; Causal inference; Difference-in-difference; PROPENSITY SCORE;
D O I
10.1016/j.csda.2021.107364
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Matched designs are commonly used in non-randomized studies to evaluate causal effects for dichotomous treatment. Optimal matching algorithms have been devised to form matched pairs or sets between treatment and control groups in various designs, including 1-k matching and full matching. With multiple treatment arms, however, the optimal matching problem cannot be solved in polynomial-time. This is a major challenge for implementing matched designs with multiple arms, which are important for evaluating causal effects with different dose levels or constructing evidence factors with multiple control groups. A polymatching framework for generating matched sets among multiple groups is proposed. An iterative multi-way algorithm for implementation is developed, which takes advantage of the existing optimal two-group matching algorithm repeatedly. An upper bound for the total distance attained by our algorithm is provided to show that the distance result is close to the optimal solution. Simulation studies are conducted to compare the proposed algorithm with the nearest neighbor algorithm under different scenarios. The algorithm is also used to construct a difference-in-difference matched design among four groups, to examine the impact of Medicaid expansion on the health status of Ohioans. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score [J].
Austin, Peter C. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2014, 33 (06) :1057-1069
[2]   Building Representative Matched Samples With Multi-Valued Treatments in Large Observational Studies [J].
Bennett, Magdalena ;
Vielma, Juan Pablo ;
Zubizarreta, Jose R. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2020, 29 (04) :744-757
[3]   Full matching in an observational study of coaching for the SAT [J].
Hansen, BB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 99 (467) :609-618
[4]   The role of the propensity score in estimating dose-response functions [J].
Imbens, GW .
BIOMETRIKA, 2000, 87 (03) :706-710
[5]   Using Approximation Algorithms to Build Evidence Factors and Related Designs for Observational Studies [J].
Karmakar, Bikram ;
Small, Dylan S. ;
Rosenbaum, Paul R. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2019, 28 (03) :698-709
[6]  
Karp Richard M, 1972, COMPLEXITY COMPUTER, P85
[7]  
Keele LJ, 2019, ARXIV190101869
[8]   Estimation of Causal Effects with Multiple Treatments: A Review and New Ideas [J].
Lopez, Michael J. ;
Gutman, Roee .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2017, 32 (03) :432-454
[9]   Optimal pair matching with two control groups [J].
Lu, B ;
Rosenbaum, PR .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2004, 13 (02) :422-434
[10]   Matching with doses in an observational study of a media campaign against drug abuse [J].
Lu, B ;
Zanutto, E ;
Hornik, R ;
Rosenbaum, PR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 96 (456) :1245-1253