The association between prostate weight and positive surgical margins in prostate cancer: A meta-analysis

被引:3
作者
He, Ke [1 ]
Cao, Zhang-Jun [1 ]
Peng, Long-Fei [1 ]
Lu, You-Lu [1 ]
Wang, Xin [1 ]
Bi, Liang-Kuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Anhui Med Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Hosp 2, 678 Furong Rd, Hefei 230032, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
dose-response; meta-analysis; prostate weight; prostatectomy; surgical margins; LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; SERUM TESTOSTERONE; HIGH-GRADE; RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE OUTCOMES; TUMOR VOLUME; SIZE MATTER; RISK-FACTOR; IMPACT; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1111/and.13533
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
There have been some conflicting claims whether larger prostate weight (PW) reduces the risk of positive surgical margins (PSMs). This study aims to examine the associations between PW and PSMs. PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane library were systematically retrieved. Relative risks (RRs) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were synthesised utilising random-effect models. Ultimately, 22 cohort studies met criteria were enrolled in this meta-analysis, of which 18 studies reporting the RR of the highest VS lowest category of PW yielded the combined RR of PSMs of 0.61 (95% CI 0.50-0.74). Subgroup analysis showed that geographic region and surgical modalities were considered as potential confounders of influence of PW on PSMs. The nonlinear dose-response relationship demonstrated that PSM risk decreased by 1% (RR = 0.99, 95% CI, 0.98-0.99) for every one gram increment in PW. This study suggests PW has a negative association with risk of PSMs, and having a appropriate PW is very important.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
  • [1] Allaparthi SB, 2010, CAN J UROL, V17, P5383
  • [2] Testosterone Deficiency and the Prostate
    Alukal, Joseph P.
    Lepor, Herbert
    [J]. UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 43 (02) : 203 - +
  • [3] Quality of Preoperative Biopsy Is a Risk Factor for Positive Surgical Margins in Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer Treated with Nerve-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
    Buetow, Zentia
    Schunk, Stefan
    Janssen, Martin
    Graeber, Stefan
    Saar, Matthias
    Kamradt, Joern
    Siemer, Stefan
    Stoeckle, Michael
    Ohlmann, Carsten-Henning
    [J]. UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 95 (04) : 465 - 471
  • [4] Çaliskan S, 2017, JCPSP-J COLL PHYSICI, V27, P97
  • [5] The impact of prostate size in laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Chang, CM
    Moon, D
    Gianduzzo, TR
    Eden, CG
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (02) : 285 - 290
  • [6] Assessment of low prostate weight as a determinant of a higher positive margin rate after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a prospective pathologic study of 1,500 cases
    Chu, Peiguo G.
    Lau, Sean K.
    Weiss, Lawrence M.
    Kawachi, Mark
    Yoshida, Jeffrey
    Ruel, Christopher
    Nelson, Rebecca
    Crocitto, Laura
    Wilson, Timothy
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2009, 23 (05): : 1058 - 1064
  • [7] Tumour volume and high grade tumour volume are the best predictors of pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
    Chun, Felix K. -H.
    Briganti, Alberto
    Jeldres, Claudio
    Gallina, Andrea
    Erbersdobler, Andreas
    Schlomm, Thorsten
    Walz, Jochen
    Eichelberg, Christian
    Salomon, Georg
    Haese, Alexander
    Currlin, Eike
    Ahyai, Sascha A.
    Benard, Francois
    Huland, Hartwig
    Graefen, Markus
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2007, 43 (03) : 536 - 543
  • [8] Does the Size Matter? Prostate Weight Does Not Predict PSA Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy
    Davidson, Darrell D.
    Koch, Michael O.
    Lin, Haiqun
    Jones, Timothy D.
    Biermann, Katharina
    Cheng, Liang
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2010, 133 (04) : 662 - 668
  • [9] Descazeaud A, 2007, PROG UROL, V17, P203
  • [10] A large prostate at radical retropubic prostatectomy does not adversely affect cancer control, continence or potency rates
    Foley, CL
    Bott, SRJ
    Thomas, K
    Parkinson, MC
    Kirby, RS
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 (04) : 370 - 374