Gamified online survey to elicit citizens' preferences and enhance learning for environmental decisions

被引:29
作者
Aubert, Alice H. [1 ]
Lienert, Judit [1 ]
机构
[1] Eawag Swiss Fed Inst Aquat Sci & Technol, Uberlandstr 133, CH-8600 Dubendorf, Switzerland
关键词
Environmental decision support systems; Gamification; Learning; Preference construction; Online survey; Participatory decision-making; PATHWAY SURVEYS; MANAGEMENT; SUPPORT; PARTICIPATION; GAMIFICATION; CONSTRUCTION; METHODOLOGY; RELIABILITY; ENJOYMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.09.013
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) requires a critical step, namely to elicit individual preferences. On the basis of learning theories, we formalize preference construction as learning about facts and values, and as a process; we also conceptualize an online preference elicitation survey that offers learning loops to increase factual learning and support preference construction. Another originality is gamification. Game elements (a narrative and non-player characters as motivational affordance) keep respondents engaged in the demanding task of weight elicitation. Our tool enables broad public participation in MCDA, allowing reliable online preference elicitation. The survey concept was tested with 107 students and a control treatment. Quantitative and qualitative data indicate that the concept works. Participants' factual knowledge increased. The survey helped students to learn about their own preferences concerning the importance of objectives. The practical implication is that weighting can be reliably elicited by online surveys. Participants reported a positive experience; further ways to improve it are thoroughly discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Adcock A., 2012, Encyclopedia of the sciences of learning, P2182, DOI [10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6]
[2]   Choice construction versus preference construction: The instability of preferences learned in context [J].
Amir, On ;
Levav, Jonathan .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 2008, 45 (02) :145-158
[3]   Toward an Improved Methodology to Construct and Reconcile Decision Analytic Preference Judgments [J].
Anderson, Richard M. ;
Clemen, Robert .
DECISION ANALYSIS, 2013, 10 (02) :121-134
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, CHOICES DESIGN ETHIC
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, BOREDOM ANXIETY EXPE
[6]   A review of water-related serious games to specify use in environmental Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis [J].
Aubert, Alice H. ;
Bauer, Rene ;
Lienert, Judit .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2018, 105 :64-78
[7]   Gamification in market research Increasing enjoyment, participant engagement and richness of data, but what of data validity? [J].
Bailey, Pippa ;
Pritchard, Gareth ;
Kernohan, Hollie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARKET RESEARCH, 2015, 57 (01) :17-28
[8]   DECISION-SUPPORT SYSTEMS - LEARNING FROM VISUAL INTERACTIVE MODELING [J].
BELTON, V ;
ELDER, MD .
DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, 1994, 12 (4-5) :355-364
[9]  
Deterding S., 2012, INTERACTIONS, V19, P14, DOI [10.1145/2212877.2212883, DOI 10.1145/2212877.2212883]
[10]  
Dillman D.A., 2009, Internet, Mail, and Mix-Mode Surveys: The Taylored Design Method