A nomogram for predicting low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer - A tool in selecting patients for active surveillance

被引:60
|
作者
Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
Wang, Xuemei
Ochiai, Atsushi
Trpkov, Kiril
Yilmaz, Asli
Donnelly, J. Bryan
Davis, John W.
Troncoso, Patricia
Babaian, R. Joseph
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Calgary Lab Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Urol, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
nomogram; extended biopsy; low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer; tumor volume; significant cancer; prostatectomy; prediction model; active surveillance;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23055
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The authors reported previously that assessment of the number of positive biopsy cores, maximum tumor length in a core, Gleason score, and prostate volume in an extended biopsy enhanced the accuracy of predicting low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer. On the basis of those findings, they developed a nomogram to predict the probability of low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer specifically for men with a single positive biopsy core. METHODS. The study cohort comprised 258 men who underwent radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in only 1 core of an extended biopsy scheme. Low-volume/low-grade cancer was defined as pathologic organ-confined disease and a tumor volume < 0.5 cc with no Gleason grade 4 or 5 cancer. Patient age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), and turner length in a biopsy core were examined as variables. A fitted multiple logistic regression model was used to establish the nomogram. RESULTS. One hundred thirty-three patients (51.6%) had low-volume/low-grade cancer. To establish the nomogram, age, PSAD, and tumor length were adopted as variables. The fitted model suggested that older age, higher PSAD values, and greater tumor length would reduce the probability of low-volume/low-grade cancer. The nomogram predicted low-volume/low-grade cancer with good discrimination (an area under the receiver operating characteristic Curve of 0.727). Calibration of this nomogram showed good predicted probability. CONCLUSIONS. The authors established a nomogram with which to predict low-volume/low-grade cancer in men with 1 positive biopsy core in an extended biopsy scheme, and they recommend this nomogram for use in selecting men for active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:2441 / 2447
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Active surveillance of low-grade prostate cancer using the SurACaP Criteria: A multi-institutional series with a median follow-up of 10 years
    Leclercq, L.
    Bastide, C.
    Lechevallier, E.
    Walz, J.
    Charvet, A. -L.
    Gondran-Tellier, B.
    Campagna, J.
    Savoie, P. -Henri
    Long-Depaquit, T.
    Daniel, L.
    Rossi, D.
    Pignot, G.
    Baboudjian, M.
    FRENCH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 34 (02):
  • [42] Surveillance biopsy and active treatment during active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Katsuyoshi Hashine
    Hiroyuki Iio
    Yoshiteru Ueno
    Shohei Tsukimori
    Iku Ninomiya
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2014, 19 : 531 - 535
  • [43] Is Active Surveillance an Option for the Management of Men with Low-grade Prostate Cancer and a Positive Family History? Results from a Large, Single-institution Series
    Leni, Riccardo
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Stabile, Armando
    Mazzone, Elio
    Pellegrino, Francesco
    Scuderi, Simone
    Robesti, Daniele
    Barletta, Francesco
    Cirulli, Giuseppe Ottone
    Cucchiara, Vito
    Zattuto, Emanuele
    Deho, Federico
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Briganti, Alberto
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2023, 6 (05): : 493 - 500
  • [44] Incidence of Upgrading and Upstaging in Patients with Low-Volume Gleason Score 3+4 Prostate Cancers at Biopsy: Finding a New Group Eligible for Active Surveillance
    Park, Hee Jung
    Ha, Yun-Sok
    Park, Sung Yul
    Kim, Yong Tae
    Lee, Tchun Yong
    Kim, Jeong Hyun
    Lee, Dong-Hyeon
    Kim, Wun-Jae
    Kim, Isaac Yi
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2013, 90 (03) : 301 - 305
  • [45] Management of low risk prostate cancer: active surveillance and focal therapy
    Klotz, Laurence
    Emberton, Mark
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2014, 24 (03) : 270 - 279
  • [46] Variation in the use of active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Loeppenberg, Bjoern
    Friedlander, David F.
    Krasnova, Anna
    Tam, Andrew
    Leow, Jeffrey J.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Barry, Hawa
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Menon, Mani
    Abdollah, Firas
    Sammon, Jesse D.
    Sun, Maxine
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    CANCER, 2018, 124 (01) : 55 - 64
  • [47] MRI and active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer; [MRI en active surveillance voor laagrisicoprostaatkanker]
    van den Bergh R.C.N.
    Meijer R.P.
    Heijmink S.W.
    van der Poel H.G.
    Tijdschrift voor Urologie, 2014, 4 (8) : 185 - 191
  • [48] Testing the most stringent criteria for selection of candidates for active surveillance in patients with low-risk prostate cancer
    Suardi, Nazareno
    Briganti, Alberto
    Gallina, Andrea
    Salonia, Andrea
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    Capitanio, Umberto
    Freschi, Massimo
    Cestari, Andrea
    Guazzoni, Giorgio
    Rigatti, Patrizio
    Montorsi, Francesco
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (11) : 1548 - 1552
  • [49] Increasing rate of pathologic upgrading in low risk prostate cancer patients in the active surveillance era
    Davaro, Facundo
    Weinstein, David
    Wong, Ryan
    Siddiqui, Sameer
    Hinyard, Leslie
    Hamilton, Zachary
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 29 (02) : 11059 - 11066
  • [50] How to Pick Out the "Unreal" Gleason 3+3 Patients: A Nomogram for More Precise Active Surveillance Protocol in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer in a Chinese Population
    Qi, Feng
    Zhu, Kai
    Cheng, Yifei
    Hua, Lixin
    Cheng, Gong
    JOURNAL OF INVESTIGATIVE SURGERY, 2021, 34 (06) : 583 - 589