A nomogram for predicting low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer - A tool in selecting patients for active surveillance

被引:60
|
作者
Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
Wang, Xuemei
Ochiai, Atsushi
Trpkov, Kiril
Yilmaz, Asli
Donnelly, J. Bryan
Davis, John W.
Troncoso, Patricia
Babaian, R. Joseph
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Calgary Lab Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Urol, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
nomogram; extended biopsy; low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer; tumor volume; significant cancer; prostatectomy; prediction model; active surveillance;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23055
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The authors reported previously that assessment of the number of positive biopsy cores, maximum tumor length in a core, Gleason score, and prostate volume in an extended biopsy enhanced the accuracy of predicting low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer. On the basis of those findings, they developed a nomogram to predict the probability of low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer specifically for men with a single positive biopsy core. METHODS. The study cohort comprised 258 men who underwent radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in only 1 core of an extended biopsy scheme. Low-volume/low-grade cancer was defined as pathologic organ-confined disease and a tumor volume < 0.5 cc with no Gleason grade 4 or 5 cancer. Patient age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), and turner length in a biopsy core were examined as variables. A fitted multiple logistic regression model was used to establish the nomogram. RESULTS. One hundred thirty-three patients (51.6%) had low-volume/low-grade cancer. To establish the nomogram, age, PSAD, and tumor length were adopted as variables. The fitted model suggested that older age, higher PSAD values, and greater tumor length would reduce the probability of low-volume/low-grade cancer. The nomogram predicted low-volume/low-grade cancer with good discrimination (an area under the receiver operating characteristic Curve of 0.727). Calibration of this nomogram showed good predicted probability. CONCLUSIONS. The authors established a nomogram with which to predict low-volume/low-grade cancer in men with 1 positive biopsy core in an extended biopsy scheme, and they recommend this nomogram for use in selecting men for active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:2441 / 2447
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A proposal of a new nomogram for predicting upstaging in contemporary D’Amico low-risk prostate cancer patients
    Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah
    Paolo Dell’Oglio
    Zhe Tian
    Jonas Schiffmann
    Shahrokh F. Shariat
    Nazareno Suardi
    Montorsi Francesco
    Briganti Alberto
    Hans Heinzer
    Hartwig Huland
    Markus Graefen
    Lars Budäus
    Pierre I. Karakiewicz
    World Journal of Urology, 2017, 35 : 189 - 197
  • [32] Are active surveillance criteria sufficient for predicting advanced stage prostate cancer patients?
    Ongun, S.
    Celik, S.
    Gul-Niflioglu, G.
    Aslan, G.
    Tuna, B.
    Mungan, U.
    Uner, S.
    Yorukoglu, K.
    ACTAS UROLOGICAS ESPANOLAS, 2014, 38 (08): : 499 - 505
  • [33] Active Surveillance for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Worldwide: The PRIAS Study
    Bul, Meelan
    Zhu, Xiaoye
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    Pickles, Tom
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Rannikko, Antti
    Bjartell, Anders
    van der Schoot, Deric K.
    Cornel, Erik B.
    Conti, Giario N.
    Boeve, Egbert R.
    Staerman, Frederic
    Vis-Maters, Jenneke J.
    Vergunst, Henk
    Jaspars, Joris J.
    Stroelin, Petra
    van Muilekom, Erik
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Roobol, Monique J.
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2013, 63 (04) : 597 - 603
  • [34] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Klotz, Laurence
    NATURE REVIEWS UROLOGY, 2011, 8 (06) : 312 - 320
  • [35] Evaluation of heterogeneous factors of low-grade prostate cancer in patients before and after radical prostatectomy
    Veliev, E., I
    Goncharuk, D. A.
    Sokolov, E. A.
    Ivkin, E., V
    Paklina, O., V
    Setdikova, G. R.
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2020, 16 (03): : 70 - 79
  • [36] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: selection of patients and predictors of progression
    Dall'Era, Marc A.
    Konety, Badrinath R.
    NATURE CLINICAL PRACTICE UROLOGY, 2008, 5 (05): : 277 - 283
  • [37] A Systematic Approach to Discussing Active Surveillance with Patients with Low-risk Prostate Cancer
    Ehdaie, Behfar
    Assel, Melissa
    Benfante, Nicole
    Malhotra, Deepak
    Vickers, Andrew
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2017, 71 (06) : 866 - 871
  • [38] Is There a Role for Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer?
    Augustin, Herbert
    Mayerhofer, Katrin
    Seles, Maximilian
    Pummer, Karl
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2015, 95 (02) : 125 - 131
  • [39] Results of active surveillance in low and intermediate risk prostate cancer
    Llorente, Carlos
    Diaz Goizueta, Francisco Javier
    Hernandez, Virginia
    Manuel de la Morena, Jose
    de la Pena, Enrique
    ARCHIVOS ESPANOLES DE UROLOGIA, 2014, 67 (05): : 452 - 456
  • [40] Surveillance biopsy and active treatment during active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Hashine, Katsuyoshi
    Iio, Hiroyuki
    Ueno, Yoshiteru
    Tsukimori, Shohei
    Ninomiya, Iku
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 19 (03) : 531 - 535