A nomogram for predicting low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer - A tool in selecting patients for active surveillance

被引:60
|
作者
Nakanishi, Hiroyuki
Wang, Xuemei
Ochiai, Atsushi
Trpkov, Kiril
Yilmaz, Asli
Donnelly, J. Bryan
Davis, John W.
Troncoso, Patricia
Babaian, R. Joseph
机构
[1] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Urol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Calgary Lab Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Urol, Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada
[5] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Pathol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
nomogram; extended biopsy; low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer; tumor volume; significant cancer; prostatectomy; prediction model; active surveillance;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.23055
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. The authors reported previously that assessment of the number of positive biopsy cores, maximum tumor length in a core, Gleason score, and prostate volume in an extended biopsy enhanced the accuracy of predicting low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer. On the basis of those findings, they developed a nomogram to predict the probability of low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer specifically for men with a single positive biopsy core. METHODS. The study cohort comprised 258 men who underwent radical prostatectomy without neoadjuvant therapy. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in only 1 core of an extended biopsy scheme. Low-volume/low-grade cancer was defined as pathologic organ-confined disease and a tumor volume < 0.5 cc with no Gleason grade 4 or 5 cancer. Patient age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, prostate volume, PSA density (PSAD), and turner length in a biopsy core were examined as variables. A fitted multiple logistic regression model was used to establish the nomogram. RESULTS. One hundred thirty-three patients (51.6%) had low-volume/low-grade cancer. To establish the nomogram, age, PSAD, and tumor length were adopted as variables. The fitted model suggested that older age, higher PSAD values, and greater tumor length would reduce the probability of low-volume/low-grade cancer. The nomogram predicted low-volume/low-grade cancer with good discrimination (an area under the receiver operating characteristic Curve of 0.727). Calibration of this nomogram showed good predicted probability. CONCLUSIONS. The authors established a nomogram with which to predict low-volume/low-grade cancer in men with 1 positive biopsy core in an extended biopsy scheme, and they recommend this nomogram for use in selecting men for active surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:2441 / 2447
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] 'Insignificant' prostate cancer on prostatectomy and cystoprostatectomy: variation on a theme 'low-volume/low-grade' prostate cancer?
    Trpkov, Kiril
    Yilmaz, Asli
    Bismar, Tarek A.
    Montironi, Rodolfo
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 106 (03) : 304 - 315
  • [2] Do low-grade and low-volume prostate cancers bear the hallmarks of malignancy?
    Ahmed, Hashim Uddin
    Arya, Manit
    Freeman, Alex
    Emberton, Mark
    LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2012, 13 (11) : E509 - E517
  • [3] Validation of a prediction model for low volume/low grade cancer: Application in selecting patients for active surveillance
    Ochiai, A.
    Trpkov, K.
    Yilmaz, A.
    Donnelly, B.
    Babaian, R. J.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 177 (03) : 907 - 910
  • [4] Low-volume grade group 2 prostate cancer candidates for active surveillance: a radical prostatectomy retrospective analysis
    Bjorklund, Johan
    Cheung, Douglas C. C.
    Martin, Lisa J. J.
    Komisarenko, Maria
    Lajkosz, Katharine
    Hamilton, Robert J. J.
    Zlotta, Alexandre R. R.
    Finelli, Antonio
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 57 (1-6) : 29 - 35
  • [5] A Nomogram for Predicting Individual Prognosis of Patients with Low-Grade Glioma
    Zhao, Ye-Yu
    Chen, Si-Hai
    Hao, Zheng
    Zhu, Hua-Xin
    Xing, Ze-Long
    Li, Mei-Hua
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 130 : E605 - E612
  • [6] Prostate volume is an independent predictive factor in selecting low-risk prostate patients for active surveillance
    Yusim, Igor
    Mazor, Elad
    Elsaraya, Nimer
    Gat, Roni
    Novack, Victor
    Mabjeesh, Nicola J.
    FRONTIERS IN UROLOGY, 2022, 2
  • [7] Radical prostatectomy findings in patients predicted to have low-volume/low-grade prostate cancer diagnosed by extended-core biopsies: an analysis of volume and zonal distribution of tumour foci
    Davis, John W.
    Kim, Jeri
    Ward, John F.
    Wang, Xuemai
    Nakanishi, Hiro
    Babaian, R. Joseph
    Troncoso, Patricia
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 105 (10) : 1386 - 1391
  • [8] Significance of Gleason Grading of Low-Grade Carcinoma of the Prostate with Therapeutic Option of Active Surveillance
    Helpap, Burkhard
    Kristiansen, Glen
    Koellerrnann, Jens
    Shaikhibrahim, Zaki
    Wernert, Nicolas
    Oehler, Ulrich
    Fellbaum, Christian
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2013, 90 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [9] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Herlemann, Annika
    Stief, Christian G.
    UROLOGE, 2016, 55 (02): : 269 - 278
  • [10] Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer
    Bangma, Chris H.
    Bul, Meelan
    van der Kwast, Theo H.
    Pickles, Tom
    Korfage, Ida J.
    Hoeks, Caroline M.
    Steyerberg, Ewout W.
    Jenster, Guido
    Kattan, Michael W.
    Bellardita, Lara
    Carroll, Peter R.
    Denis, Louis J.
    Parker, Chris
    Roobol, Monique J.
    Emberton, Mark
    Klotz, Laurence H.
    Rannikko, Antti
    Kakehi, Yoshiyuki
    Lane, Janet A.
    Schroder, Fritz H.
    Semjonow, Axel
    Trock, Bruce J.
    Valdagni, Riccardo
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2013, 85 (03) : 295 - 302