共 44 条
Ejaculatory Function Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer
被引:2
作者:
Sholklapper, Tamir
[1
]
Creswell, Michael
[1
]
Cantalino, Jonathan
[1
]
Markel, Michael
[1
]
Zwart, Alan
[4
]
Danner, Malika
[1
]
Ayoob, Marilyn
[1
]
Yung, Thomas
[1
]
Collins, Brian
[1
]
Kumar, Deepak
[4
]
Aghdam, Nima
[3
]
Rubin, Rachel S.
[2
]
Hankins, Ryan
[2
]
Suy, Simeng
[1
]
Collins, Sean
[1
]
机构:
[1] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Radiat Med, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[2] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess, Dept Radiat Med, Boston, MA USA
[4] North Carolina Cent Univ, Julius L Chambers Biomed Biotechnol Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
关键词:
Prostate Cancer;
SBRT;
CyberKnife;
Ejaculation;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
SEXUAL FUNCTION;
RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY;
ERECTILE FUNCTION;
DYSFUNCTION;
MEN;
RADIOTHERAPY;
TAMSULOSIN;
MANAGEMENT;
DIAGNOSIS;
D O I:
10.1016/j.jsxm.2022.02.018
中图分类号:
R5 [内科学];
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号:
1002 ;
100201 ;
摘要:
Background: Ejaculatory dysfunction is an important male quality of life issue which has not yet been studied in the setting of prostate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Aim: The purpose of this study is to evaluate ejaculatory function following SBRT for prostate cancer. Methods: Two hundred and thirty-one patients on a prospective quality of life study with baseline ejaculatory capacity treated with prostate SBRT from 2013 to 2019 were included in this analysis. Ejaculation was assessed via the Ejaculation Scale (ES-8) from the Male Sexual Health Questionnaire. Patients completed the questionnaire at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months post-SBRT. Elderly patients (Age > 70) and those who received hormonal therapy were excluded from analysis. Patients were treated to 35-36.25 Gy in 5 fractions delivered with the CyberKnife Radiosurgical System (Accuray). Outcomes: Ejaculatory function was assessed by ES-8 scores (range 4-40) with lower values representing increased interference or annoyance. Results: Median age at the time of treatment was 65 years. Median follow up was 24 months (IQR 1924.5 months). 64.5% of patients had ED at baseline (SHIM < 22). The 2-year anejaculation rate was 15%. Mean composite ES-8 scores showed a decline in the first month following treatment then stabilized: 30.4 (start of treatment); 26.5 (1 month); 27.6 (3 month); 27.0 ( 6 month); 26.2 (9 month); 25.4 (12 month); 25.0 (18 month) and 25.4 (24 month). White race, higher pre-treatment SHIM (>= 22), and higher ES-8 (>= 31) at treatment start were significantly associated with a decreased probability of a clinically significant decline. Patient-reported ejaculate volume was significantly reduced at all time points postSBRT. Ejaculatory discomfort peaked at 1 month and 9 months post-SBRT. Prior to treatment, 8.0% of men reported that they were very to extremely bothered by their ejaculatory dysfunction. The number of patients reporting this concern increased to 14.4% at one year and dropped to 11% at 24-months postSBRT. Clinical Translation: Patients undergoing prostate SBRT may experience meaningful changes in ejaculatory function and should be counseled on the trajectory of these side effects. Strengths & Limitations: This was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database. Subjective questionnaire responses captured limited aspects of ejaculatory function in this cohort. Conclusion: The high incidence of moderate to extreme bother in ejaculatory function before and after SBRT suggests a need for novel approaches to improving ejaculation. Copyright (C) 2022, International Society of Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:771 / 780
页数:10
相关论文