Evolving etiologies and rates of revision total knee arthroplasty: a 10-year institutional report

被引:14
作者
Brown, Matthew L. [1 ]
Javidan, Pooya [2 ]
Early, Sam [3 ]
Bugbee, William [4 ]
机构
[1] Cooper Univ Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, Sheridan Pavil 3 Cooper Plaza,Suite 408, Camden, NJ 08103 USA
[2] Kaiser Permanente, Dept Orthopaed Surg, El Cajon, CA USA
[3] Scripps Clin, Shiley Ctr Orthopaed Res & Educ, La Jolla, CA USA
[4] Scripps Clin, Dept Orthopaed Surg, La Jolla, CA USA
关键词
Total knee arthroplasty; Revision; Failure; Etiology; PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION; UNITED-STATES; POLYETHYLENE; CEMENTLESS; OUTCOMES; FAILURE; HIP;
D O I
10.1186/s42836-022-00134-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKA) performed in the United States is projected to rise significantly, with a proportionate increase in the revision burden. Understanding the mechanism of failure in primary TKA is important as etiologies continue to evolve and reasons for revision change. The purpose of this study was to determine the reason for revision TKA at our institution among early and late failures and assess if the etiology has changed over a 10-year time-period. Methods We identified 258 revision TKAs performed at our institution between 2005 and 2014. Reasons for revision TKA were categorized according to diagnosis. We also conducted subgroup analysis for TKA revisions performed within two years of the primary TKA (early failures) and those performed after two years (late failures). Revision TKAs were also grouped by year of primary TKA (before and after 2000) and time period in which the revision TKA was performed (2005-2009 and 2010-2014). Results The most common reason for revision TKA was infection (29.3%), followed by aseptic loosening (19.7%), which together accounted for half of all revisions. Other indications for revision were instability (11.6%), osteolysis (10.4%), arthrofibrosis (8.1%), polyethylene (PE) wear (7.7%), malalignment/malposition (5.4%), patellar complication (3.1%), periprosthetic fracture (2.3%), pain (1.5%), and extensor mechanism deficiency (0.8%). Nearly half of early failures (47%) were due to infection. Osteolysis and PE wear made of a significantly higher proportion of revisions of TKAs performed prior to 2000 compared to index TKAs performed after 2000. Conclusion At our institution, infection was the most common reason for revision TKA. Infection had a higher rate of early revisions. Proportion of TKAs revised for osteolysis and PE wear was higher for TKAs performed prior to 2000. Proportion of revision TKA for infection and instability were higher with TKAs performed after 2000.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Alamanda VK, 2019, BONE JOINT J, V101B, P3, DOI [10.1302/0301-620X.101B1.BJJ-2018-0233.R1, 10.1302/0301-620x.101b1.bjj-2018-0233.r1]
  • [2] Contemporary Strategies to Prevent Infection in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty
    Batty, Lachlan M.
    Lanting, Brent
    [J]. CURRENT REVIEWS IN MUSCULOSKELETAL MEDICINE, 2020, 13 (04) : 400 - 408
  • [3] Clinical and Economic Burden of Revision Knee Arthroplasty
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Smith, Jon
    Miller, Larry E.
    Block, Jon E.
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE INSIGHTS-ARTHRITIS AND MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2012, 5 : 89 - 94
  • [4] Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty for Periprosthetic Joint Infection Is Associated With Increased Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality Relative to Noninfectious Revisions
    Boddapati, Venkat
    Fu, Michael C.
    Mayman, David J.
    Su, Edwin P.
    Sculco, Peter K.
    McLawhorn, Alexander S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2018, 33 (02) : 521 - 526
  • [5] Periprosthetic infection is the major indication for TKA revision - experiences from a university referral arthroplasty center
    Boelch, S. P.
    Jakuscheit, A.
    Doerries, S.
    Fraissler, L.
    Hoberg, M.
    Arnholdt, J.
    Rudert, M.
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2018, 19
  • [6] The Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States
    Bozic, Kevin J.
    Kurtz, Steven M.
    Lau, Edmund
    Ong, Kevin
    Chiu, Vanessa
    Vail, Thomas P.
    Rubash, Harry E.
    Berry, Daniel J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (01) : 45 - 51
  • [7] Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Performed Using High-Viscosity Cement is Associated With Higher Odds of Revision for Aseptic Loosening
    Buller, Leonard T.
    Rao, Vindhya
    Chiu, Yu-Fen
    Nam, Denis
    McLawhorn, Alexander S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2020, 35 (06) : S182 - S189
  • [8] A Bundle Protocol to Reduce the Incidence of Periprosthetic Joint Infections After Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Single-Center Experience
    Bullock, Matthew W.
    Brown, Matthew L.
    Bracey, Daniel N.
    Langfitt, Maxwell K.
    Shields, John S.
    Lang, Jason E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (04) : 1067 - 1073
  • [9] Total Knee Arthroplasty Volume, Utilization, and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1991-2010
    Cram, Peter
    Lu, Xin
    Kates, Stephen L.
    Singh, Jasvinder A.
    Li, Yue
    Wolf, Brian R.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 308 (12): : 1227 - 1236
  • [10] Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States
    Delanois, Ronald E.
    Mistry, Jaydev B.
    Gwam, Chukwuweike U.
    Mohamed, Nequesha S.
    Choksi, Ujval S.
    Mont, Michael A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2017, 32 (09) : 2663 - 2668