Oral ibandronate is as active as intravenous zoledronic acid for reducing bone turnover markers in women with breast cancer and bone metastases

被引:43
作者
Body, J.-J.
Lichinitser, M.
Tjulandin, S.
Garnero, P.
Bergstroem, B.
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Inst Jules Bordet, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
[2] NN Blokhin Russian Canc Res Ctr, Moscow, Russia
[3] INSERM, Res Unit 664, F-69008 Lyon, France
[4] Synarc, Mol Markers, Lyon, France
[5] Hoffmann La Roche Inc, Nutley, NJ 07110 USA
关键词
bisphosphonates; bone markers; bone metastases; ibandronate; zoledronic acid;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdm119
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Phase III study comparing the effect of oral ibandronate and intravenous zoledronic acid on bone markers. Patients and methods: Breast cancer patients with bone metastases received ibandronate 50 mg/day (n = 137) or zoledronic acid 4 mg every 4 weeks (n = 138) for 12 weeks. The primary end point was mean percentage change in serum levels of cross-linked C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (S-CTX) at week 12. Urinary CTX (U-CTX), bone alkaline phosphatase (ALP), amino-terminal procollagen propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) and osteocalcin (OC) were also measured and bone pain and safety assessed. Results: Both bisphosphonates significantly reduced S-CTX (mean ibandronate 76% +/- 29 (SD) versus mean zoledronic acid 73% +/- 47; P < 0.001 for both versus baseline) and U-CTX (ibandronate 78% +/- 50 versus zoledronic acid 86% +/- 17; P < 0.001). The difference in S-CTX between treatments was 0.6% (confidence interval -1.7% to 3.0%), which was within the prespecified noninferiority margin. Bone ALP, PINP and OC decreased by 26%-47% compared with baseline with both bisphosphonates. Compared with zoledronic acid, ibandronate patients reported fewer adverse events overall (65.0% versus 75.9%), and on days 1-3 (8.0% versus 47.5%), including less pyrexia (overall incidence 0% versus 16.8%) and bone pain (5.8% versus 12.4%). Conclusions: Oral ibandronate was well tolerated and statistically noninferior to zoledronic acid for percentage change in the bone resorption marker, S-CTX.
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1171
页数:7
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   COX REGRESSION-MODEL FOR COUNTING-PROCESSES - A LARGE SAMPLE STUDY [J].
ANDERSEN, PK ;
GILL, RD .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1982, 10 (04) :1100-1120
[2]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[3]   Zoledronic acid versus ibandronate comparative evaluation in breast cancer patients with bone metastases: The NCRI Ace trial [J].
Barrett-Lee, PJ ;
Murray, N .
BONE, 2006, 38 (03) :S67-S67
[4]   Visualization of bisphosphonate-induced caspase-3 activity in apoptotic osteoclasts in vitro [J].
Benford, HL ;
McGowan, NWA ;
Helfrich, MH ;
Nuttall, ME ;
Rogers, MJ .
BONE, 2001, 28 (05) :465-473
[5]  
Berenson JR, 2001, CANCER, V91, P1191, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(20010401)91:7<1191::AID-CNCR1119>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-0
[7]  
Berruti A, 1999, CLIN CHEM, V45, P1240
[8]   Rationale for the use of bisphosphonates in osteoblastic and osteolytic bone lesions [J].
Body, JJ .
BREAST, 2003, 12 :S37-S44
[9]   Bisphosphonates for malignancy-related bone disease: current status, future developments [J].
Body, JJ .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2006, 14 (05) :408-418
[10]   Oral ibandronate reduces the risk of skeletal complications in breast cancer patients with metastatic bone disease: results from two randomised, placebo-controlled phase III studies [J].
Body, JJ ;
Diel, IJ ;
Lichinitzer, M ;
Lazarev, A ;
Pecherstorfer, M ;
Bell, R ;
Tripathy, D ;
Bergstronn, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2004, 90 (06) :1133-1137