Patients' experiences of screening for type 2 diabetes: prospective qualitative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial

被引:53
作者
Eborall, Helen [1 ]
Davies, Richard
Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
Griffin, Simon
Lawton, Juia
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Gen Practice & Primary Care Res Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Strangeways Res Lab, MRC, Epidemiol Unit, Cambridge CB1 8RN, England
[3] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Med, Res Unit Hlth Behav & Change, Sch Clin Sci & Community Hlth, Edinburgh EH8 9AG, Midlothian, Scotland
来源
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 335卷 / 7618期
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1136/bmj.39308.392176.BE
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives To provide insight into factors that contribute to the anxiety reported in a quantitative study of the psychological effect of screening for type 2 diabetes. To explore expectations of and reactions to the screening experience of patients with positive, negative, and intermediate results. Design Prospective qualitative interview study of patients attending a screening programme for type 2 diabetes. Setting Seven general practices in the ADDITION (Cambridge) trial in the east of England. Participants 23 participants (aged 50-69) attending different stages in the screening process. Results Participants' perceptions changed as they progressed through the screening programme; the stepwise process seemed to help them adjust psychologically. The first screening test was typically considered unimportant and was attended with no thought about its implications. By the final diagnostic test, type 2 diabetes was considered a strong possibility, albeit a "mild" form. After diagnosis, people with screen detected type 2 diabetes tended to downplay its importance and talked confidently about their plans to control it. Participants with intermediate results seemed uncertain about their diagnosis, and those who screened negative were largely unaware of their remaining high risk. Conclusions This study helps in understanding the limited psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes quantified previously, in particular by the quantitative substudy of ADDITION (Cambridge). The findings have implications for implementing such a screening programme in terms of timing and content.
引用
收藏
页码:490 / 493
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Adriaanse MC, 2002, DIABETIC MED, V19, P406
  • [2] QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODS IN GENERAL-PRACTICE AND PRIMARY-CARE
    BRITTEN, N
    JONES, R
    MURPHY, E
    STACY, R
    [J]. FAMILY PRACTICE, 1995, 12 (01) : 104 - 114
  • [3] How do people with Type 2 diabetes perceive and respond to cardiovascular risk?
    Carroll, C
    Naylor, E
    Marsden, P
    Dornan, T
    [J]. DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2003, 20 (05) : 355 - 360
  • [4] The prevalence of diabetes in the Kingdom of Tonga
    Colagiuri, S
    Colagiuri, R
    Na'ati, S
    Muimuiheata, S
    Hussain, Z
    Palu, T
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2002, 25 (08) : 1378 - 1383
  • [5] Psychological impact of screening for type 2 diabetes: controlled trial and comparative study embedded in the ADDITION (Cambridge) randomised controlled trial
    Eborall, Helen C.
    Griffin, Simon J.
    Prevost, A. Toby
    Kinmonth, Ann-Louise
    French, David P.
    Sutton, Stephen
    [J]. BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2007, 335 (7618): : 486 - 489
  • [6] GLASER B, 1967, THEDISCOVERY GROUNDE
  • [7] Griffin SJ, 2000, DIABETES-METAB RES, V16, P164, DOI 10.1002/1520-7560(200005/06)16:3<164::AID-DMRR103>3.0.CO
  • [8] 2-R
  • [9] Group DPPR., 2002, N Engl J Med, V346, P393, DOI [DOI 10.1056/NEJMOA012512, 10.1056/NEJMoa012512]
  • [10] ONSET OF NIDDM OCCURS AT LEAST 4-7 YR BEFORE CLINICAL-DIAGNOSIS
    HARRIS, MI
    KLEIN, R
    WELBORN, TA
    KNUIMAN, MW
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1992, 15 (07) : 815 - 819