The potential of dual-energy CT to reduce proton beam range uncertainties

被引:122
作者
Bar, Esther [1 ,2 ]
Lalonde, Arthur [3 ]
Royle, Gary [2 ]
Lu, Hsiao-Ming [4 ,5 ]
Bouchard, Hugo [1 ,3 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Natl Phys Lab, Acoust & Ionising Radiat Team, Teddington TW11 0LW, Middx, England
[2] UCL, Dept Med Phys & Biomed Engn, London WC1E 6BT, England
[3] Univ Montreal, Dept Phys, Montreal, PQ H3T 1J4, Canada
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[6] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal, Ctr Rech, Montreal, PQ H2X 0A9, Canada
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
dual-energy CT; proton stopping power; proton therapy; range uncertainties; tissue characterization; EXPERIMENTAL-VERIFICATION; TISSUE PARAMETERS; ATOMIC NUMBERS; DENSITY; SINGLE; CALIBRATION; THERAPY; RATIO;
D O I
10.1002/mp.12215
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Dual-energy CT (DECT) promises improvements in estimating stopping power ratios (SPRs) for proton therapy treatment planning. Although several comparable mathematical formalisms have been proposed in literature, the optimal techniques to characterize human tissue SPRs with DECT in a clinical environment are not fully established. The aim of this work is to compare the most robust DECT methods against conventional single-energy CT (SECT) in conditions reproducing a clinical environment, where CT artifacts and noise play a major role on the accuracy of these techniques. Methods: Available DECT tissue characterization methods are investigated and their ability to predict SPRs is compared in three contexts: (a) a theoretical environment using the XCOM cross section database; (b) experimental data using a dual-source CT scanner on a calibration phantom; (c) simulations of a virtual humanoid phantom with the ImaSim software. The latter comparison accounts for uncertainties caused by CT artifacts and noise, but leaves aside other sources of uncertainties such as CT grid size and the I-values. To evaluate the clinical impact, a beam range calculation model is used to predict errors from the probability distribution functions determined with ImaSim simulations. Range errors caused by SPR errors in soft tissues and bones are investigated. Results: Range error estimations demonstrate that DECT has the potential of reducing proton beam range uncertainties by 0.4% in soft tissues using low noise levels of 12 and 8 HU in DECT, corresponding to 7 HU in SECT. For range uncertainties caused by the transport of protons through bones, the reduction in range uncertainties for the same levels of noise is found to be up to 0.6 to 1.1 mm for bone thicknesses ranging from 1 to 5 cm, respectively. We also show that for double the amount noise, i. e., 14 HU in SECT and 24 and 16 HU for DECT, the advantages of DECT in soft tissues are lost over SECT. In bones however, the reduction in range uncertainties is found to be between 0.5 and 0.9 mm for bone thicknesses ranging from 1 to 5 cm, respectively. Conclusion: DECT has a clear potential to improve proton beam range predictions over SECT in proton therapy. However, in the current state high levels of noise remain problematic for DECT characterization methods and do not allow getting the full benefits of this technology. Future work should focus on adapting DECT methods to noise and investigate methods based on raw-data to reduce CT artifacts. c 2017 American Association of Physicists in Medicine
引用
收藏
页码:2332 / 2344
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[11]   Tissue decomposition from dual energy CT data for MC based dose calculation in particle therapy [J].
Huenemohr, Nora ;
Paganetti, Harald ;
Greilich, Steffen ;
Jaekel, Oliver ;
Seco, Joao .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (06)
[12]   Experimental verification of ion stopping power prediction from dual energy CT data in tissue surrogates [J].
Huenemohr, Nora ;
Krauss, Bernhard ;
Tremmel, Christoph ;
Ackermann, Benjamin ;
Jaekel, Oliver ;
Greilich, Steffen .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (01) :83-96
[13]  
ICRU, 1989, 44 ICRU, V44
[14]  
ICRU, 1984, 37 ICRU, V37
[15]   X-RAY ATTENUATION COEFFICIENTS OF ELEMENTS AND MIXTURES [J].
JACKSON, DF ;
HAWKES, DJ .
PHYSICS REPORTS-REVIEW SECTION OF PHYSICS LETTERS, 1981, 70 (03) :169-233
[16]   A general method to derive tissue parameters for Monte Carlo dose calculation with multi-energy CT [J].
Lalonde, Arthur ;
Bouchard, Hugo .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (22) :8044-8069
[17]   ImaSim, An Animated Tool for Teaching Imaging [J].
Landry, G. ;
DeBlois, F. ;
Bazalova, M. ;
Verhaegen, F. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (06) :2696-2697
[18]   Deriving effective atomic numbers from DECT based on a parameterization of the ratio of high and low linear attenuation coefficients [J].
Landry, Guillaume ;
Seco, Joao ;
Gaudreault, Mathieu ;
Verhaegen, Frank .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (19) :6851-6866
[19]   Deriving concentrations of oxygen and carbon in human tissues using single- and dual-energy CT for ion therapy applications [J].
Landry, Guillaume ;
Parodi, Katia ;
Wildberger, Joachim E. ;
Verhaegen, Frank .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2013, 58 (15) :5029-5048
[20]   Extracting atomic numbers and electron densities from a dual source dual energy CT scanner: Experiments and a simulation model [J].
Landry, Guillaume ;
Reniers, Brigitte ;
Granton, Patrick Vincent ;
van Rooijen, Bart ;
Beaulieu, Luc ;
Wildberger, Joachim E. ;
Verhaegen, Frank .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 100 (03) :375-379