Dignity and the Australian Constitution

被引:0
作者
Stephenson, Scott [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Melbourne, Sch Law, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
来源
SYDNEY LAW REVIEW | 2020年 / 42卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Today dignity is one of the most significant constitutional principles across the world given that it underpins and informs the interpretation of human rights. This article considers the role of dignity in the Australian Constitution. The starting point is the 2019 decision of Clubb v Edwards, which marked the arrival of dignity in Australia. In that case, the High Court of Australia found that laws restricting protests outside of abortion facilities were justified under the implied freedom of political communication partly on the basis that they protect the dignity of persons accessing those facilities. The article argues that dignity was used in two ways in the Court's decision: first, as a means of distinguishing natural persons from corporations; and second, as one purpose that a law can pursue that is compatible with the implied freedom. The article develops and defends the first use of dignity, while identifying some challenges that arise with the second use of dignity.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 394
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   ESSAYS ON THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION - ELSEMITCHELL,R [J].
NEEDHAM, D .
AUSTRALIAN QUARTERLY, 1962, 34 (01) :118-120
[32]   INTRODUCTION TO AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION - LANE,PH [J].
DONALD, B .
AUSTRALIAN QUARTERLY, 1974, 46 (03) :90-93
[33]   The Commerce Power Under the Australian Constitution [J].
不详 .
COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW, 1942, 42 (04) :660-681
[34]   MAKING OF AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION - LANAUZE,JA [J].
MANNING, HT .
AMERICAN HISTORICAL REVIEW, 1973, 78 (05) :1518-1519
[35]   VOTING RIGHTS OF EXPATRIATES AND THE AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION [J].
Gray, Anthony .
MONASH UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW, 2023, 49 (03) :1-44
[36]   Federation and culture: Reflections on the Australian Constitution [J].
Hatzistergos, John .
AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL, 2009, 83 (12)
[37]   MAKING OF AUSTRALIAN CONSTITUTION - LANAUZE,JA [J].
BOLTON, GC .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 1974, 68 (01) :315-316
[38]   Federal implications under the Australian Constitution [J].
McLeish, Stephen .
PUBLIC LAW REVIEW, 2014, 25 (03) :172-184
[39]   Australia is different: Restitution and the Australian Constitution [J].
Mason, Brian .
AUSTRALIAN LAW JOURNAL, 2016, 90 (02) :120-138
[40]   Trapped in a constitution: The Australian republic debate [J].
Ward, AJ .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 35 (01) :117-123