A deep learning classifier for digital breast tomosynthesis

被引:25
作者
Ricciardi, R. [1 ,2 ]
Mettivier, G. [1 ,2 ]
Staffa, M. [1 ]
Sarno, A. [2 ]
Acampora, G. [1 ]
Minelli, S. [3 ]
Santoro, A. [3 ]
Antignani, E. [3 ]
Orientale, A. [4 ]
Pilotti, I. A. M. [4 ]
Santangelo, V [4 ]
D'Andria, P. [4 ]
Russo, P. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Napoli Federico II, Dipartimento Fis Ettore Pancini, I-80126 Naples, Italy
[2] Ist Nazl Fis Nucl, Sez Napoli, I-80126 Naples, Italy
[3] AORN Antonio Cardarelli, I-80131 Naples, Italy
[4] AOU San Giovanni di Dio Ruggi DAragona, I-84131 Salerno, Italy
来源
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2021年 / 83卷
关键词
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis; Breast Tumor; Machine Learning; Convolution neural network; Computed Aided Diagnosis; Deep Learning; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; MASS DETECTION; NEURAL-NETWORKS; MAMMOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.021
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To develop a computerized detection system for the automatic classification of the presence/absence of mass lesions in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) annotated exams, based on a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN). Materials and Methods: Three DCNN architectures working at image-level (DBT slice) were compared: two stateof-the-art pre-trained DCNN architectures (AlexNet and VGG19) customized through transfer learning, and one developed from scratch (DBT-DCNN). To evaluate these DCNN-based architectures we analysed their classification performance on two different datasets provided by two hospital radiology departments. DBT slice images were processed following normalization, background correction and data augmentation procedures. The accuracy, sensitivity, and area-under-the-curve (AUC) values were evaluated on both datasets, using receiver operating characteristic curves. A Grad-CAM technique was also implemented providing an indication of the lesion position in the DBT slice. Results: Accuracy, sensitivity and AUC for the investigated DCNN are in-line with the best performance reported in the field. The DBT-DCNN network developed in this work showed an accuracy and a sensitivity of (90% +/- 4%) and (96% +/- 3%), respectively, with an AUC as good as 0.89 +/- 0.04. A k-fold cross validation test (with k = 4) showed an accuracy of 94.0% +/- 0.2%, and a F1-score test provided a value as good as 0.93 +/- 0.03. Grad-CAM maps show high activation in correspondence of pixels within the tumour regions. Conclusions: We developed a deep learning-based framework (DBT-DCNN) to classify DBT images from clinical exams. We investigated also a possible application of the Grad-CAM technique to identify the lesion position.
引用
收藏
页码:184 / 193
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Agasthya G, 2018, HDB XRAY IMAGING PHY
[2]   A comparison of image interpretation times in Full Field Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis [J].
Astley, Susan ;
Connor, Sophie ;
Lim, Yit ;
Tate, Catriona ;
Entwistle, Helen ;
Morris, Julie ;
Whiteside, Sigrid ;
Sergeant, Jamie ;
Wilson, Mary ;
Beetles, Ursula ;
Boggis, Caroline ;
Gilbert, Fiona .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2013: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, 2013, 8673
[3]  
Bernard S, 2008, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5116, P151, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-70538-3_22
[4]   Application of breast tomosynthesis in screening: incremental effect on mammography acquisition and reading time [J].
Bernardi, D. ;
Ciatto, S. ;
Pellegrini, M. ;
Anesi, V. ;
Burlon, S. ;
Cauli, E. ;
Depaoli, M. ;
Larentis, L. ;
Malesani, V. ;
Targa, L. ;
Baldo, P. ;
Houssami, N. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1020) :E1174-E1178
[5]   A performance comparison between shallow and deeper neural networks supervised classification of tomosynthesis breast lesions images [J].
Bevilacqua, Vitoantonio ;
Brunetti, Antonio ;
Guerriero, Andrea ;
Trotta, Gianpaolo Francesco ;
Telegrafo, Michele ;
Moschetta, Marco .
COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2019, 53 :3-19
[6]   Computer-aided detection of masses in digital tomosynthesis mammography: Comparison of three approaches [J].
Chan, Heang-Ping ;
Wei, Jun ;
Zhang, Yiheng ;
Helvie, Mark A. ;
Moore, Richard H. ;
Sahiner, Berkman ;
Hadjiiski, Lubomir ;
Kopans, Daniel B. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 35 (09) :4087-4095
[7]   Characterization of masses in digital breast tomosynthesis: Comparison of machine learning in projection views and reconstructed slices [J].
Chan, Heang-Ping ;
Wu, Yi-Ta ;
Sahiner, Berkman ;
Wei, Jun ;
Helvie, Mark A. ;
Zhang, Yiheng ;
Moore, Richard H. ;
Kopans, Daniel B. ;
Hadjiiski, Lubomir ;
Way, Ted .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (07) :3576-3586
[8]   Computer-aided detection system for breast masses on digital tomosynthesis mammograms: Preliminary experience [J].
Chan, HP ;
Wei, J ;
Sahiner, B ;
Rafferty, EA ;
Wu, T ;
Roubidoux, MA ;
Moore, RH ;
Kopans, DB ;
Hadjiiski, LM ;
Helvie, MA .
RADIOLOGY, 2005, 237 (03) :1075-1080
[9]   Detection of soft tissue densities from digital breast tomosynthesis: comparison of conventional and deep learning approaches [J].
Fotin, Sergei V. ;
Yin, Yin ;
Haldankar, Hrishikesh ;
Hoffmeister, Jeffrey W. ;
Periaswamy, Senthil .
MEDICAL IMAGING 2016: COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS, 2015, 9785
[10]   Artificial Intelligence for Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Current Concepts and Future Perspectives [J].
Geras, Krzysztof J. ;
Mann, Ritse M. ;
Moy, Linda .
RADIOLOGY, 2019, 293 (02) :246-259