Episiotomy and its relationship to various clinical variables that influence its performance

被引:22
作者
Ballesteros-Meseguer, Carmen [1 ,2 ]
Carrillo-Garcia, Cesar [3 ]
Meseguer-de-Pedro, Mariano [4 ]
Canteras-Jordana, Manuel [5 ]
Emilia Martinez-Roche, M. [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Murcia, Fac Enfermeria, Campus Univ Espinardo,Edtificio 23, E-30100 Murcia, Spain
[2] Hosp Clin Univ Virgen de la Arrixaca, Serv Murciano Salud, Murcia, Spain
[3] Serv Murciano Salud, Direcc Gen Recursos Humanos, Murcia, Spain
[4] Univ Murcia, Fac Psicol, Dept Psiquiatria & Psicol Social, Campus Univ Espinardo,Edtificio 23, E-30100 Murcia, Spain
[5] Univ Murcia, Facultad Enfermeria, Dept Bioestadist, Campus Univ Espinardo,Edtificio 23, E-30100 Murcia, Spain
[6] Univ Murcia, Facultad Enfermeria, Dept Enfermeria, Campus Univ Espinardo,Edtificio 23, E-30100 Murcia, Spain
[7] Unidad Docente Obstet Ginecol Matrona, Studies, Murcia, Spain
来源
REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM | 2016年 / 24卷
关键词
Episiotomy; Natural Childbirth; Obstetric Nursing; Obstetric Surgical Procedures; Labor Obstetric; VAGINAL DELIVERY; PERINEAL LACERATIONS; RISK-FACTORS; WOMEN; TRAUMA;
D O I
10.1590/1518-8345.0334.2686
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Objective: to understand the episiotomy rate and its relationship with various clinical variables. Method: a descriptive, cross-sectional, analytic study of 12,093 births in a tertiary hospital. Variables: Parity, gestational age, start of labor, use of epidural analgesia, oxytocin usage, position during fetal explusion, weight of neonate, and completion of birth. The analysis was performed with SPSS 19.0. Results: the global percentage of episiotomies was 50%. The clinical variables that presented a significant association were primiparity (RR=2.98), gestational age >41 weeks (RR=1.2), augmented or induced labor (RR=1.33), epidural analgesia use (RR=1,95), oxytocin use (RR=1.58), lithotomy position during fetal expulsion (RR=6.4), and instrumentation (RR=1.84). Furthermore, maternal age >= 35 years (RR=0.85) and neonatal weight <2500 g (RR=0.8) were associated with a lower incidence of episiotomy. Conclusions: episiotomy is dependent on obstetric interventions performed during labor. If we wish to reduce the episiotomy rate, it will be necessary to bear in mind these risk factors when establishing policies for reducing this procedure.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Is It Possible to Never Perform Episiotomy During Vaginal Delivery?
    Amorim, Melania M.
    Franca-Neto, Antonio H.
    Leal, Nicole V.
    Melo, Fabiana O.
    Maia, Sabina B.
    Alves, Janio N.
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 123 : 38S - 38S
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1996, CUID PART NORM GUIA
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, ESTRATEGIA ATENCION
  • [4] Third- and fourth-degree perineal laceration in vaginal delivery
    Chia, Chun-Chieh
    Huang, Soon-Cen
    [J]. TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 51 (01): : 148 - 152
  • [5] Variation in and Factors Associated With Use of Episiotomy
    Friedman, Alexander M.
    Ananth, Cande V.
    Prendergast, Eri
    D'Alton, Mary E.
    Wright, Jason D.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (02): : 197 - 199
  • [6] Funai EF, 2012, MANAGEMENT NORMAL LA
  • [7] Risk factors for severe perineal trauma during vaginal childbirth: A Western Australian retrospective cohort study
    Hauck, Yvonne L.
    Lewis, Lucy
    Nathan, Elizabeth A.
    White, Christine
    Doherty, Dorota A.
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2015, 28 (01) : 16 - 20
  • [8] Variability in the rate of episiotomies and its relation to severe perineal tears and neonatal morbility
    Hernandez-Martinez, Antonio
    Isabel Pascual-Pedreno, Ana
    Bano Garnes, Ana Belen
    del Rocio Melero-Jimenez, Maria
    Molina Alarcon, Milagros
    [J]. ENFERMERIA CLINICA, 2014, 24 (05): : 269 - 275
  • [9] Kettle C, 2011, CLIN EVID
  • [10] Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury and Anal Incontinence Following Vaginal Birth: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    LaCross, Allison
    Groff, Meredith
    Smaldone, Arlene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2015, 60 (01) : 37 - 47