Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex

被引:189
作者
Jeffery, Dean T.
Norton, Jonathan A.
Roy, Francois D.
Gorassini, Monica A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Ctr Neurosci, Heritage Med Res Ctr 513, Edmonton, AB T6G 2S2, Canada
[2] Univ Alberta, Ctr Neurosci, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta, Dept Biomed Engn, Edmonton, AB, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
tibialis anterior; corticospinal tract; transcranial magnetic stimulation; anodal; cathodal; tDCS;
D O I
10.1007/s00221-007-1093-y
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the human motor cortex at an intensity of 1 mA has been shown to be efficacious in increasing (via anodal tDCS) or decreasing (via cathodal tDCS) the excitability of corticospinal projections to muscles of the hand. In this study, we examined whether tDCS at currents of 2 mA could effect similar changes in the excitability of deeper cortical structures that innervate muscles of the lower leg. Similar to the hand area, 10 min of stimulation with the anode over the leg area of the motor cortex increased the excitability of corticospinal tract projections to the tibialis anterior (TA) muscle, as reflected by an increase in the amplitude of the motor evoked potentials (MEPs) evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation. MEP amplitudes recorded at rest and during a background contraction were increased following anodal tDCS and remained elevated at 60 min compared to baseline values by 59 and 35%, respectively. However, in contrast to the hand, hyperpolarizing cathodal stimulation at equivalent currents had minimal effect on the amplitude of the MEPs recorded at rest or during background contraction of the TA muscle. These results suggest that it is more difficult to suppress the excitability of the leg motor cortex with cathodal tDCS than the hand area of the motor cortex.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 287
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] AGNEW WF, 1987, NEUROSURGERY, V20, P143
  • [2] Input-output properties and gain changes in the human corticospinal pathway
    Devanne, H
    Lavoie, BA
    Capaday, C
    [J]. EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 1997, 114 (02) : 329 - 338
  • [3] Driving plasticity in human adult motor cortex is associated with improved motor function after brain injury
    Fraser, C
    Power, M
    Hamdy, S
    Rothwell, J
    Hobday, D
    Hollander, I
    Tyrell, P
    Hobson, A
    Williams, S
    Thompson, D
    [J]. NEURON, 2002, 34 (05) : 831 - 840
  • [4] A sham-controlled, phase II trial of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of central pain in traumatic spinal cord injury
    Fregni, Felipe
    Boggio, Paulo S.
    Lima, Moises C.
    Ferreira, Merari J. L.
    Wagner, Tim
    Rigonatti, Sergio P.
    Castro, Anita W.
    Souza, Daniel R.
    Riberto, Marcelo
    Freedman, Steven D.
    Nitsche, Michael A.
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    [J]. PAIN, 2006, 122 (1-2) : 197 - 209
  • [5] Hallett M, 2003, SUPPL CLIN NEUROPHYS, V56, P153
  • [6] Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke
    Hummel, F
    Celnik, P
    Giraux, P
    Floel, A
    Wu, WH
    Gerloff, C
    Cohen, LG
    [J]. BRAIN, 2005, 128 : 490 - 499
  • [7] Non-invasive brain stimulation: a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?
    Hummel, Friedhelm C.
    Cohen, Leonardo G.
    [J]. LANCET NEUROLOGY, 2006, 5 (08) : 708 - 712
  • [8] Safety and cognitive effect of frontal DC brain polarization in healthy individuals
    Iyer, MB
    Mattu, U
    Grafman, J
    Lomarev, M
    Sato, S
    Wassermann, EM
    [J]. NEUROLOGY, 2005, 64 (05) : 872 - 875
  • [9] LEONE AP, 1994, BRAIN, V117, P847
  • [10] Pharmacological approach to the mechanisms of transcranial DC-stimulation-induced after-effects of human motor cortex excitability
    Liebetanz, D
    Nitsche, MA
    Tergau, F
    Paulus, W
    [J]. BRAIN, 2002, 125 : 2238 - 2247