Group multi-criteria design concept evaluation using combined rough set theory and fuzzy set theory

被引:96
作者
Shidpour, Hesam [1 ]
Da Cunha, Catherine [1 ]
Bernard, Alain [1 ]
机构
[1] LUNAM Univ, Ecole Cent Nantes, IRCCyN, CNRS,UMR 6597, 1 Rue Noe, F-44321 Nantes 3, France
关键词
Design concept evaluation; Rough set; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy AHP; Extent analysis method; Interval-based relative closeness index; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; CONCEPT SELECTION; PRODUCT DESIGN; AHP; CLASSIFICATION; ALTERNATIVES; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.022
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Design concept evaluation is a critical stage in the product development which has significant impact on the downstream process in product development thus on success of new product. Design concept evaluation is widely recognized as a complex multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem involving various decision criteria and large amount of data which are usually imprecise and subjective. This paper proposes a new decision-making method to evaluate product design concepts based on the distance between interval vectors each alternative and positive and negative ideal reference vectors. Rank of design concepts is obtained by calculating interval-based relative closeness index for each alternative. In this method, to deal with uncertainty and vagueness of data in the primary phases of product design, performance of design concepts with respect to quantitative and qualitative criteria are concurrently evaluated using rough set and fuzzy set. The weights of criteria used in the evaluation are obtained using the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. The efficacy of the method is demonstrated with a numerical example and the results are compared to TOPSIS method. In final, the conclusions of our method are represented and some future directions are proposed to improve the model. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 644
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
[61]   Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan [J].
Wang, Yu-Jie .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, 34 (03) :1837-1845
[62]   Collaborative multidisciplinary decision making using game theory and design capability indices [J].
Xiao, AR ;
Zeng, S ;
Allen, JK ;
Rosen, DW ;
Mistree, F .
RESEARCH IN ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2005, 16 (1-2) :57-72
[63]  
Xiong Wei, 2010, Proceedings 2010 3rd International Conference on Information Management, Innovation Management and Industrial Engineering (ICIII 2010), P244, DOI 10.1109/ICIII.2010.223
[64]  
Yao Y., 1997, Rough Sets and Data Mining, P301
[65]   A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment [J].
Zhai, Lian-Yin ;
Khoo, Li-Pheng ;
Zhong, Zhao-Wei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2008, 37 (5-6) :613-624
[66]   Design concept evaluation in product development using rough sets and grey relation analysis [J].
Zhai, Lian-Yin ;
Khoo, Li-Pheng ;
Zhong, Zhao-Wei .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (03) :7072-7079
[67]   A new integrated decision-making approach for design alternative selection for supporting complex product development [J].
Zhang, Zaifang ;
Chu, Xuening .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING, 2009, 22 (03) :179-198
[68]   An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number [J].
Zhu, Guo-Niu ;
Hu, Jie ;
Qi, Jin ;
Gu, Chao-Chen ;
Peng, Ying-Hong .
ADVANCED ENGINEERING INFORMATICS, 2015, 29 (03) :408-418
[69]  
Zimmermann H.-J., 2001, FUZZY SET THEORY ITS, DOI 10.1007/978-94-010-0646-0
[70]   Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review [J].
Zopounidis, C ;
Doumpos, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 138 (02) :229-246