Group multi-criteria design concept evaluation using combined rough set theory and fuzzy set theory

被引:96
作者
Shidpour, Hesam [1 ]
Da Cunha, Catherine [1 ]
Bernard, Alain [1 ]
机构
[1] LUNAM Univ, Ecole Cent Nantes, IRCCyN, CNRS,UMR 6597, 1 Rue Noe, F-44321 Nantes 3, France
关键词
Design concept evaluation; Rough set; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy AHP; Extent analysis method; Interval-based relative closeness index; EXTENT ANALYSIS METHOD; CONCEPT SELECTION; PRODUCT DESIGN; AHP; CLASSIFICATION; ALTERNATIVES; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE; MODEL; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2016.08.022
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Design concept evaluation is a critical stage in the product development which has significant impact on the downstream process in product development thus on success of new product. Design concept evaluation is widely recognized as a complex multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem involving various decision criteria and large amount of data which are usually imprecise and subjective. This paper proposes a new decision-making method to evaluate product design concepts based on the distance between interval vectors each alternative and positive and negative ideal reference vectors. Rank of design concepts is obtained by calculating interval-based relative closeness index for each alternative. In this method, to deal with uncertainty and vagueness of data in the primary phases of product design, performance of design concepts with respect to quantitative and qualitative criteria are concurrently evaluated using rough set and fuzzy set. The weights of criteria used in the evaluation are obtained using the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. The efficacy of the method is demonstrated with a numerical example and the results are compared to TOPSIS method. In final, the conclusions of our method are represented and some future directions are proposed to improve the model. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 644
页数:12
相关论文
共 70 条
  • [11] Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP
    Chang, DY
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1996, 95 (03) : 649 - 655
  • [12] Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education
    Chen, Jui-Kuei
    Chen, I-Shuo
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (03) : 1981 - 1990
  • [13] Child P., 1991, MCKINSEY Q, V4, P52
  • [14] An Evidential-Reasoning-Interval-Based Method for New Product Design Assessment
    Chin, Kwai-Sang
    Yang, Jian-Bo
    Guo, Min
    Lam, James Ping-Kit
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2009, 56 (01) : 142 - 156
  • [15] Concept selection of car bumper beam with developed hybrid bio-composite material
    Davoodi, M. M.
    Sapuan, S. M.
    Ahmad, D.
    Aidy, A.
    Khalina, A.
    Jonoobi, Mehdi
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2011, 32 (10) : 4857 - 4865
  • [16] Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach
    Duran, Orlando
    Aguilo, Jose
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2008, 34 (03) : 1787 - 1794
  • [17] A QFD-based fuzzy MCDM approach for supplier selection
    Dursun, Mehtap
    Karsak, E. Ertugrul
    [J]. APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2013, 37 (08) : 5864 - 5875
  • [18] Modeling tradeoffs in three-dimensional concurrent engineering: a goal programming approach
    Fine, CH
    Golany, B
    Naseraldin, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2005, 23 (3-4) : 389 - 403
  • [19] Product architecture assessment: a tool to link product, process, and supply chain design decisions
    Fixson, SK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2005, 23 (3-4) : 345 - 369
  • [20] Optimization model for sustainable materials selection using objective and subjective factors
    Florez, Laura
    Castro-Lacouture, Daniel
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2013, 46 : 310 - 321