Adaptation to Spanish of the "Relational Needs Satisfaction Scale": Translation and psychometric testing

被引:4
作者
Iraurgi, Ioseba [1 ]
Gomez-Marroquin, Ignacio [1 ]
Erskine, Richard [2 ]
Mauriz, Amaia [3 ]
Martinez-Rodriguez, Silvia [1 ]
Gorbena, Susana [1 ]
Zvelc, Gregor [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Deusto, Fac Hlth Sci, Bilbao, Spain
[2] Inst Integrat Psychotherapy, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[3] Inst Bios Psicoterapia Integrat, Bilbao, Spain
[4] Univ Ljubljana, Dept Psychol, Fac Arts, Ljubljana, Slovenia
来源
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY | 2022年 / 13卷
关键词
Relational Needs Satisfaction Scale; test translation; psychometric adequacy; validity evidence; integrative psychological therapy (IPT); SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; ASYMPTOTIC ROBUSTNESS; BIFACTOR; ATTACHMENT; COEFFICIENT; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY; MODELS; NUMBER; FIT;
D O I
10.3389/fpsyg.2022.992205
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This article aims to adapt to Spanish the Relational Needs Satisfaction Scale (RNSS) and to test the factor structure with a clinical and a non-clinical sample. A total of 459 individuals completed the RNSS, a measure of life satisfaction and of psychological wellbeing. Results showed that the translation was adequate. An exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted followed by the test of three models that confirmed the five-factor structure and the second-order global factor proposed in the original study, and in adaptations to other languages. The advantages and disadvantages of these models are discussed. Correlations of the RNSS with life satisfaction and psychological wellbeing measures were in the expected direction, providing evidence of convergent validity. The Spanish version of the RNSS is a valid and reliable measure of the construct it was intended to measure, though some improvements in item wording could be incorporated and tested (for instance, item 18 should be positively worded as the rest of the items in order to avoid the effect of negative wording).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [1] Acquadro C., 2004, Linguistic Validation Manual for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PR0) Instruments
  • [2] Ainsworth S.M., 1978, PATTERNS ATTACHMENT, DOI 10.1093/jaarel/52.2.411-a
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1985, INTERPERSONAL WORLD
  • [4] ATTACHMENT STYLES AMONG YOUNG-ADULTS - A TEST OF A 4-CATEGORY MODEL
    BARTHOLOMEW, K
    HOROWITZ, LM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 61 (02) : 226 - 244
  • [5] THE NEED TO BELONG - DESIRE FOR INTERPERSONAL ATTACHMENTS AS A FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN-MOTIVATION
    BAUMEISTER, RF
    LEARY, MR
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1995, 117 (03) : 497 - 529
  • [6] Bentler P. M., 1995, EQS STRUCTURAL EQUAT
  • [7] Bowlby J., 1980, LOSS SADNESS DEPRESS, VVol. 3
  • [8] Bowlby J., 1973, SEPARATION ANXIETY A, P1
  • [9] Bowlby J., 1982, Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment, V2nd ed.
  • [10] Brown T. A., 2014, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR