Investing in the use of a checklist during differential diagnoses consideration: what's the trade-off?

被引:12
作者
Chew, Keng Sheng [1 ]
van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G. [1 ]
Durning, Steven J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaysia Sarawak, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak, Malaysia
关键词
Clinical decision making; Diagnostic errors; Cognitive errors; Script concordance test; Checklist; Differential diagnosis; COGNITIVE ERRORS; STRATEGIES; VALIDITY; SCRIPTS; DESIGN; LOAD;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-017-1078-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: A key challenge clinicians face when considering differential diagnoses is whether the patient data have been adequately collected. Insufficient data may inadvertently lead to premature closure of the diagnostic process. This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the application of a mnemonic checklist helps to stimulate more patient data collection, thus leading to better diagnostic consideration. Methods: A total of 88 final year medical students were assigned to either an educational intervention group or a control group in a non-equivalent group post-test only design. Participants in the intervention group received a tutorial on the use of a mnemonic checklist aimed to minimize cognitive errors in clinical decision-making. Two weeks later, the participants in both groups were given a script concordance test consisting of 10 cases, with 3 items per case, to assess their clinical decisions when additional data are given in the case scenarios. Results: The Mann-Whitney U-test performed on the total scores from both groups showed no statistical significance (U = 792, z = -1.408, p = 0.159). When comparisons were made for the first half and the second half of the SCT, it was found that participants in the intervention group performed significantly better than participants in the control group in the first half of the test, with median scores of 9.15 (IQR 8.00-10.28) vs. 8.18 (IQR 7.16-9.24) respectively, U = 642.5, z = -2. 661, p = 0.008. No significant difference was found in the second half of the test, with the median score of 9.58 (IQR 8.9010.56) vs. 9.81 (IQR 8.83-11.12) for the intervention group and control group respectively (U = 897.5, z = -0.524, p = 0.60). Conclusion: Checklist use in differential diagnoses consideration did show some benefit. However, this benefit seems to have been traded off by the time and effort in using it. More research is needed to determine whether this benefit could be translated into clinical practice after repetitive use.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Improving diagnosis in health care
[2]   THE CLINICAL REASONING PROCESS [J].
BARROWS, HS ;
FELTOVICH, PJ .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 1987, 21 (02) :86-91
[3]   Scripts and medical diagnostic knowledge: Theory and applications for clinical reasoning instruction and research [J].
Charlin, BD ;
Tardif, J ;
Boshuizen, HPA .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2000, 75 (02) :182-190
[4]   Scripts and clinical reasoning [J].
Charlin, Bernard ;
Boshuizen, Henny P. A. ;
Custers, Eugene J. ;
Feltovich, Paul J. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2007, 41 (12) :1178-1184
[5]   Teaching metacognition in clinical decision-making using a novel mnemonic checklist: an exploratory study [J].
Chew, Keng Sheng ;
Durning, Steven J. ;
van Merrienboer, Jeroen J. G. .
SINGAPORE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2016, 57 (12) :694-700
[6]   A portable mnemonic to facilitate checking for cognitive errors [J].
Chew K.S. ;
Van Merriënboer J. ;
Durning S.J. .
BMC Research Notes, 9 (1)
[7]   The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them [J].
Croskerry, P .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2003, 78 (08) :775-780
[8]   Cognitive debiasing 1: origins of bias and theory of debiasing [J].
Croskerry, Pat ;
Singhal, Geeta ;
Mamede, Silvia .
BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 :ii58-ii64
[9]   Checklists to Reduce Diagnostic Errors [J].
Ely, John W. ;
Graber, Mark L. ;
Croskerry, Pat .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 2011, 86 (03) :307-313
[10]   Script concordance tests: Guidelines for construction [J].
Fournier, Jean Paul ;
Demeester, Anne ;
Charlin, Bernard .
BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2008, 8 (1)