The combination of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein or presepsin alone improves the accuracy of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis and systematic review

被引:113
|
作者
Ruan, Lin [1 ]
Chen, Guan-Yu [1 ]
Liu, Zhen [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Yun [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Guang-Yu [1 ,2 ]
Li, Shu-Fang [1 ,2 ]
Li, Chun-Ni [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Lin-Shan [1 ,3 ]
Tao, Zheng [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Guangxi Med Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Naning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[2] Guangxi Med Univ, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Dept Resp Oncol, Naning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
[3] Guangxi Med Univ, Dept Urol, Affiliated Tumor Hosp, Naning, Guangxi, Peoples R China
来源
CRITICAL CARE | 2018年 / 22卷
关键词
Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Procalcitonin; C-reactive protein; Neonatal sepsis; ONSET SEPSIS; INFECTIONS; MARKER; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1186/s13054-018-2236-1
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Sepsis is an important cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality; therefore, the early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis is essential. Method: Our aim was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin combined with C-reactive protein (PCT+CRP) and presepsin in the diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. We searched seven databases to identify studies that met the inclusion criteria. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), area under curve (AUC), and corresponding 95% credible interval (95% CI) were calculated by true positive (TP), false positive (FP), false negative (FN), and true negative (TN) classification using a bivariate regression model in STATA 14.0 software. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, PLR, NLR, DOR, AUC, and corresponding 95% CI were the primary outcomes. Secondary outcomes included the sensitivity and specificity in multiple subgroup analyses. Results: A total of 28 studies enrolling 2661 patients were included in our meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity of CRP (0.71 (0.63, 0.78)) was weaker than that of PCT (0.85 (0.79, 0.89)), PCT + CRP (0.91 (0.84, 0.95)) and presepsin (0.94 (0.80, 0.99)) and the pooled NLR of presepsin (0.06 (0.02, 0.23)) and PCT + CRP (0.10 (0.05, 0.19)) were less than CRP (0.33 (0.26, 0.42)), and the AUC for presepsin (0.99 (0.98, 1.00)) was greater than PCT+CRP (0.96 (0.93, 0.97)), CRP (0.85 (0.82, 0.88)) and PCT (0.91 (0.89, 0.94)). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that 0.5-2 ng/mL may be the appropriate cutoff interval for PCT. A cut-off value >10 mg/L for CRP had high sensitivity and specificity. Conclusions: The combination of PCT and CRP or presepsin alone improves the accuracy of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. However, further studies are required to confirm these findings.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The combination of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein or presepsin alone improves the accuracy of diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a meta-analysis and systematic review
    Lin Ruan
    Guan-Yu Chen
    Zhen Liu
    Yun Zhao
    Guang-Yu Xu
    Shu-Fang Li
    Chun-Ni Li
    Lin-Shan Chen
    Zheng Tao
    Critical Care, 22
  • [2] Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wu, Chin-Chieh
    Lan, Hao-Min
    Han, Shih-Tsung
    Chaou, Chung-Hsien
    Yeh, Chun-Fu
    Liu, Su-Hsun
    Li, Chih-Huang
    Blaney, Gerald N., III
    Liu, Zhen-Ying
    Chen, Kuan-Fu
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2017, 7
  • [3] Comparison of diagnostic accuracy in sepsis between presepsin, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chin-Chieh Wu
    Hao-Min Lan
    Shih-Tsung Han
    Chung-Hsien Chaou
    Chun-Fu Yeh
    Su-Hsun Liu
    Chih-Huang Li
    Gerald N. Blaney
    Zhen-Ying Liu
    Kuan-Fu Chen
    Annals of Intensive Care, 7
  • [4] The diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for sepsis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tan, Meichun
    Lu, Yunxia
    Jiang, Hao
    Zhang, Liandong
    JOURNAL OF CELLULAR BIOCHEMISTRY, 2019, 120 (04) : 5852 - 5859
  • [5] Accuracy of presepsin in neonatal sepsis: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parri, Niccolo
    Trippella, Giulia
    Lisi, Catiuscia
    De Martino, Maurizio
    Galli, Luisa
    Chiappini, Elena
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTI-INFECTIVE THERAPY, 2019, 17 (04) : 223 - 232
  • [6] Comparing the Diagnostic Accuracy of Procalcitonin and C-Reactive Protein in Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review
    Anugu, NagaSpurthy Reddy
    Khan, Safeera
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 13 (11)
  • [7] Accuracy of Presepsin in Sepsis Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Wu, Jiayuan
    Hu, Liren
    Zhang, Gaohua
    Wu, Fenping
    He, Taiping
    PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07):
  • [8] C-Reactive Protein in Early Diagnosis of Neonatal Late-Onset Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Aldayel, Abdulrahman
    Alshammari, Arkan Hamed
    Hakami, Manal Taher
    Alotaibi, Tareq Hamad
    Alminee, Alaa Adel
    Alhijji, Banan Sabri
    AlGharbi, Abdullah Hamoud
    Alshammery, Amjad Salem
    Alqasem, Rawabi Mousa
    Alharbi, Omran Saed
    Allal, Ali Abdurhman Alj
    ANNALS OF MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES RESEARCH, 2020, 10 (05) : 1013 - 1017
  • [9] Comparison of the accuracy of neutrophil CD64, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein for sepsis identification: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yeh, Chun-Fu
    Wu, Chin-Chieh
    Liu, Su-Hsun
    Chen, Kuan-Fu
    ANNALS OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [10] Comparison of the accuracy of neutrophil CD64, procalcitonin, and C-reactive protein for sepsis identification: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chun-Fu Yeh
    Chin-Chieh Wu
    Su-Hsun Liu
    Kuan-Fu Chen
    Annals of Intensive Care, 9