Analysis of research trends and constructs in context to lean six sigma frameworks

被引:50
作者
Yadav, Gunjan [1 ]
Seth, Dinesh [2 ]
Desai, Tushar N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sardar Vallabhbhai Natl Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Surat, India
[2] Qatar Univ, Mech & Ind Dept, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Six sigma; Lean manufacturing; Literature; Hybrid systems; Framework; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; CYCLE TIME REDUCTION; STREAM MAPPING VSM; SUPPLY CHAIN; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRY; MODEL; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1108/JMTM-03-2017-0043
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose - The literature of lean six sigma (LSS) is flooded with frameworks. But to date, there has been no attempt to expose the inconsistencies in the existing frameworks and associated research trends. The purpose of this paper is to critically review 26 LSS frameworks and highlight inconsistencies. The study also helps in analysing research trends and constructs of LSS frameworks, and facilitates new applications. Design/methodology/approach - It uses Scopus database and finalises 26 frameworks in the LSS domain considering a timeframe from 2000 to 2017, using a structured literature review approach and involving domain experts. It uses a battery of systematic requirements-based questions to understand trends and covers building blocks/constructs also. Findings - It reveals inconsistencies at three different stages, namely, the framework stage, usage stage capturing existing research trends and construct stage. It also offers details at building block/construct level. Thus, it offers guidance in reducing inconsistencies and possible modifications in the existing frameworks. It not only exposes existing constructs and sub-constructs but also guides about the new upcoming changes in the business influencing the LSS domain. It also educates about the strengths and weaknesses of each framework. Research limitations/implications - This study tries to reduce inconsistencies, but does not offer new generalised or sector-specific framework. Practical implications - This study will assist for modification/corrections in the existing frameworks by reducing inconsistencies and will encourage new frameworks to facilitate applications. Originality/value - This is a unique study which offers frameworks-based review, portrays research trends and guides about constructs of a framework by exposing inconsistencies at each stage. It helps in reducing inconsistencies and offers guidance regarding modifications in the LSS framework considering upcoming challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 821
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Industry 4.0 and Lean Six Sigma integration in manufacturing: A literature review, an integrated framework and proposed research perspectives [J].
Skalli, Dounia ;
Charkaoui, Abdelkabir ;
Cherrafi, Anass ;
Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo ;
Antony, Jiju ;
Shokri, Alireza .
QUALITY MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2023, 30 (01) :16-40
[32]   Application of hybrid framework to facilitate lean six sigma implementation: a manufacturing company case experience [J].
Yadav, Gunjan ;
Seth, Dinesh ;
Desai, Tushar N. .
PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2018, 29 (03) :185-201
[33]   Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 combination: scoping review and perspectives [J].
Tissir, Siham ;
Cherrafi, Anass ;
Chiarini, Andrea ;
Elfezazi, Said ;
Bag, Surajit .
TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 2023, 34 (3-4) :261-290
[34]   LEAN SIX SIGMA FOR SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS PRACTICES: A CASE STUDY AND STANDARDISATION [J].
Klochkov, Yury ;
Gazizulina, Albina ;
Muralidharan, Kunnummal .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (01) :47-74
[35]   A framework for the integration of Green and Lean Six Sigma for superior sustainability performance [J].
Cherrafi, Anass ;
Elfezazi, Said ;
Govindan, Kannan ;
Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo ;
Benhida, Khalid ;
Mokhlis, Ahmed .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2017, 55 (15) :4481-4515
[36]   Integrating Green Lean Six Sigma and industry 4.0: a conceptual framework [J].
Kaswan, Mahender Singh ;
Rathi, Rajeev ;
Cross, Jennifer ;
Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo ;
Antony, Jiju ;
Yadav, Vishwas .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2023, 34 (01) :87-121
[37]   Assessing the adoption of critical success factors for lean six sigma implementation [J].
Gastelum-Acosta, Carlos ;
Limon-Romero, Jorge ;
Tlapa, Diego ;
Baez-Lopez, Yolanda ;
Tortorella, Guilherme ;
Rodriguez Borbon, Manuel Ivan ;
Navarro-Cota, Christian Xavier .
JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2022, 33 (01) :124-145
[38]   Analyzing barriers and strategies for implementing Lean Six Sigma in the context of Indian SMEs [J].
Gaikwad, Sandesh Kanhu ;
Paul, Ananna ;
Moktadir, Md Abdul ;
Paul, Sanjoy Kumar ;
Chowdhury, Priyabrata .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2020, 27 (08) :2365-2399
[39]   Combining Lean and Six Sigma in the context of Systems Engineering design [J].
Sreeram, T. R. ;
Thondiyath, Asokan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2015, 6 (04) :290-312
[40]   Lean Six Sigma 4.0-a framework and review for Lean Six Sigma practices in the digital era [J].
Citybabu, G. ;
Yamini, S. .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 31 (09) :3288-3326