Analysis of research trends and constructs in context to lean six sigma frameworks

被引:50
作者
Yadav, Gunjan [1 ]
Seth, Dinesh [2 ]
Desai, Tushar N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Sardar Vallabhbhai Natl Inst Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Surat, India
[2] Qatar Univ, Mech & Ind Dept, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Six sigma; Lean manufacturing; Literature; Hybrid systems; Framework; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; CYCLE TIME REDUCTION; STREAM MAPPING VSM; SUPPLY CHAIN; ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; BUSINESS PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRY; MODEL; SUSTAINABILITY;
D O I
10.1108/JMTM-03-2017-0043
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Purpose - The literature of lean six sigma (LSS) is flooded with frameworks. But to date, there has been no attempt to expose the inconsistencies in the existing frameworks and associated research trends. The purpose of this paper is to critically review 26 LSS frameworks and highlight inconsistencies. The study also helps in analysing research trends and constructs of LSS frameworks, and facilitates new applications. Design/methodology/approach - It uses Scopus database and finalises 26 frameworks in the LSS domain considering a timeframe from 2000 to 2017, using a structured literature review approach and involving domain experts. It uses a battery of systematic requirements-based questions to understand trends and covers building blocks/constructs also. Findings - It reveals inconsistencies at three different stages, namely, the framework stage, usage stage capturing existing research trends and construct stage. It also offers details at building block/construct level. Thus, it offers guidance in reducing inconsistencies and possible modifications in the existing frameworks. It not only exposes existing constructs and sub-constructs but also guides about the new upcoming changes in the business influencing the LSS domain. It also educates about the strengths and weaknesses of each framework. Research limitations/implications - This study tries to reduce inconsistencies, but does not offer new generalised or sector-specific framework. Practical implications - This study will assist for modification/corrections in the existing frameworks by reducing inconsistencies and will encourage new frameworks to facilitate applications. Originality/value - This is a unique study which offers frameworks-based review, portrays research trends and guides about constructs of a framework by exposing inconsistencies at each stage. It helps in reducing inconsistencies and offers guidance regarding modifications in the LSS framework considering upcoming challenges.
引用
收藏
页码:794 / 821
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Revealing research trends and themes in Lean Six Sigma: from 2000 to 2016
    Raval, Shruti J.
    Kant, Ravi
    Shankar, Ravi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2018, 9 (03) : 399 - 443
  • [2] ISM and Fuzzy MICMAC application for analysis of Lean Six Sigma barriers with environmental considerations
    Ben Ruben, R.
    Vinodh, S.
    Asokan, P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2018, 9 (01) : 64 - 90
  • [3] Recent developments in sustainable lean six sigma frameworks: literature review and directions
    Formigoni Carvalho Walter, Olga Maria
    Paladini, Edson Pacheco
    Henning, Elisa
    Kalbusch, Andreza
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2023, 34 (09) : 830 - 848
  • [4] Lean, six sigma and lean six sigma in the food industry: A systematic literature review
    Message Costa, Luana Bonome
    Filho, Moacir Godinho
    Fredendall, Lawrence D.
    Gomez Paredes, Fernando Jose
    TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 82 : 122 - 133
  • [5] Portfolio analysis of a Lean Six Sigma production process
    Jordan, Eva
    Kusar, Janez
    Rihar, Lidija
    Berlec, Tomaz
    CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2019, 27 (03) : 797 - 813
  • [6] Investigating the green impact of Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma
    Chugani, Nashmi
    Kumar, Vikas
    Garza-Reyes, Jose Arturo
    Rocha-Lona, Luis
    Upadhyay, Arvind
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2017, 8 (01) : 7 - 32
  • [7] Where to direct research in lean six sigma?: Bibliometric analysis, scientific gaps and trends on literature
    da Silva, Fabio Francisco
    Filser, Lukas Daniel
    Juliani, Fernando
    de Oliveira, Otavio Jose
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2018, 9 (03) : 324 - 350
  • [8] A morphological analysis of research literature on Lean Six Sigma for services
    Sunder, Vijaya M.
    Ganesh, L. S.
    Marathe, Rahul R.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS & PRODUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2018, 38 (01) : 149 - 182
  • [9] Prioritising solutions for Lean Six Sigma adoption barriers through fuzzy AHP-modified TOPSIS framework
    Yadav, Gunjan
    Seth, Dinesh
    Desai, Tushar N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 2018, 9 (03) : 270 - 300
  • [10] Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma: an analysis based on operations strategy
    Drohomeretski, Everton
    Gouvea da Costa, Sergio E.
    de Lima, Edson Pinheiro
    da Rosa Garbuio, Paula Andrea
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2014, 52 (03) : 804 - 824