Determining Significant Elevation of Intraocular Pressure Using Self-tonometry

被引:9
作者
Huang, Jessie [1 ,2 ]
Phu, Jack [1 ,2 ]
Kalloniatis, Michael [1 ,2 ]
Zangerl, Barbara [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New South Wales, Ctr Eye Hlth, Kensington, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ New South Wales, Sch Optometry & Vis Sci, Kensington, NSW, Australia
关键词
CENTRAL CORNEAL THICKNESS; OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA; REBOUND TONOMETER; BIOMECHANICAL PROPERTIES; PROSTAGLANDIN ANALOGS; APPLANATION TONOMETRY; ETHNIC-DIFFERENCES; DIURNAL-VARIATION; ACCURACY; EYE;
D O I
10.1097/OPX.0000000000001478
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to use a large patient cohort to develop a practical, analytical tool for interpreting Icare HOME measurements with respect to applanation pressure. METHODS IOP measurements using the Icare HOME and an applanation tonometer were taken prospectively in 498 consecutive patients. Bland-Altman, frequency distribution, and linear regression analysis were applied to determine measurement differences. A novel criterion, Threshold Icare HOME IOP, was developed to assist identification of elevation above target applanation pressure, considering the expected diurnal variation and measurement variability. RESULTS Icare HOME tended to underestimate applanation tonometry (mean bias, -1.7 mmHg; 95% limits of agreement, -7.0 to +3.6). Overall, differences were within +/- 3 mmHg in 71.5% and +/- 5 mmHg in 92% of patients. Based on the novel criterion developed, Icare HOME measurements that exceed target applanation pressure by 6 mmHg or greater are generally outside the 95% limit of expected observations. CONCLUSIONS The Threshold Icare HOME IOP is a novel and practical criterion that can assist clinicians in their interpretation of Icare HOME phasing measurements with respect to target applanation pressures. Elevation above the expected thresholds may prompt closer monitoring or even modifications to glaucoma management.
引用
收藏
页码:86 / 93
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Impact of corneal parameters on intraocular pressure measurements in different tonometry methods
    Zakrzewska, Aleksandra
    Wiacek, Marta P.
    Machalinska, Anna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 12 (12) : 1853 - 1858
  • [22] Assessment of intraocular pressure in chinchillas of different age groups using rebound tonometry
    Yokoay Claros Chacaltana, Flor Diana
    Tadeu Pigatto, Joao Antonio
    Denardin, Ione Terezinha
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2016, 46 (08): : 1466 - 1471
  • [23] Influence of Ocular Stiffness on Intraocular Pressure Estimation Using Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Shirane, Masako
    Kiuchi, Yoshiaki
    Otani, Keiko
    Kurita, Yuichi
    Kaneko, Makoto
    Takenaka, Joji
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 33 (03) : 293 - 299
  • [24] Intraocular Pressure Values Obtained by Ocular Response Analyzer, Dynamic Contour Tonometry, and Goldmann Tonometry in Keratokonic Corneas
    Bayer, Atilla
    Sahin, Afsun
    Hurmeric, Volkan
    Ozge, Gokhan
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2010, 19 (08) : 540 - 545
  • [25] Assessment of Factors Affecting the Difference in Intraocular Pressure Measurements Between Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry
    Wang, Jing
    Cayer, Marie-Michelle
    Descovich, Denise
    Kamdeu-Fansi, Alvine
    Harasymowycz, Paul J.
    Li, Gisele
    Lesk, Mark R.
    JOURNAL OF GLAUCOMA, 2011, 20 (08) : 482 - 487
  • [26] Validation of rebound tonometry for intraocular pressure measurement in the rabbit
    Zhang, Hong
    Yang, Dong
    Ross, Craig M.
    Wigg, Jonathan P.
    Pandav, Surinder
    Crowston, Jonathan G.
    EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH, 2014, 121 : 86 - 93
  • [27] Difference in intraocular pressure measurements between non-contact tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry and the role of central corneal thickness in affecting glaucoma referrals
    Kamel, Khalid
    Dervan, Edward
    Falzon, Kevin
    O'Brien, Colm
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2019, 188 (01) : 321 - 325
  • [28] Agreement of patient-measured intraocular pressure using rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) in glaucoma patients
    Tan, Shaoying
    Yu, Marco
    Baig, Nafees
    Hansapinyo, Linda
    Tham, Clement C.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [29] Rebound Self-tonometry Acquisition Time and Ease of Use Evaluated by Newly Trained Optometry Students and Optometrists
    Hyatt, Ruth
    Furtado, Nadine M.
    Eberle, Darcy
    Jensen, Katherine
    Tsang, Timothy
    Kwan, Justin
    OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2020, 97 (02) : 94 - 100
  • [30] Influence of Corneal Visualization Scheimpflug Technology Tonometry on Intraocular Pressure
    Borroni, Davide
    Gadhvi, Kunal Ajit
    Hristova, Rozaliya
    McLean, Keri
    de Lossada, Carlos Rocha
    Romano, Vito
    Kaye, Stephen
    OPHTHALMOLOGY SCIENCE, 2021, 1 (01):