Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making

被引:174
作者
Ataei, Younes [1 ]
Mahmoudi, Amin [2 ]
Feylizadeh, Mohammad Reza [3 ]
Li, Deng-Feng [4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz Branch, Young Researchers & Elite Club, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct & Real Estate, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz Branch, Dept Ind Engn, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiple Attribute Decision-Making; Group Decision-Making; Ordinal Priority Approach; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; MCDM METHODS; SELECTION; AGGREGATION; NORMALIZATION; JUDGMENTS; RANKING; WEIGHT; TOPSIS; MADM;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105893
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The current study aims to present a new method called Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making (MADM). This method can be used in individual or group decision-making (GDM). In the case of GDM, through this method, we first determine the experts and their priorities. The priority of experts may be determined based on their experience and/or knowledge. After prioritization of the experts, the attributes are prioritized by each expert. Meanwhile, each expert ranks the alternatives based on each attribute, and the sub-attributes if any. Ultimately, by solving the presented linear programming model of this method, the weights of the attributes, alternatives, experts, and sub-attributes would be obtained simultaneously. A significant advantage of the proposed method is that it does not make use of pairwise comparison matrix, decision-making matrix (no need for numerical input), normalization methods, averaging methods for aggregating the opinions of experts (in GDM) and linguistic variables. Another advantage of this method is the possibility for experts to only comment on the attributes and alternatives for which they have sufficient knowledge and experience. The validity of the proposed model has been evaluated using several group and individual instances. Finally, the proposed method has been compared with other methods such as AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE and QUALIFLEX. Based on comparisons among the weights and ranks using Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients, the proposed method has an applicable performance compared with other methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Nanofluid selection used for coolant in heat exchanger by multiple attribute decision-making method [J].
M. B. Maisuria ;
D. M. Sonar ;
M. K. Rathod .
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2021, 35 :689-695
[42]   Pythagorean fuzzy Dombi aggregation operators and its applications in multiple attribute decision-making [J].
Jana, Chiranjibe ;
Senapati, Tapan ;
Pal, Madhumangal .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (09) :2019-2038
[43]   Nanofluid selection used for coolant in heat exchanger by multiple attribute decision-making method [J].
Maisuria, M. B. ;
Sonar, D. M. ;
Rathod, M. K. .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2021, 35 (02) :689-695
[44]   Sustainable Assessment of Aerosol Pollution Decrease Applying Multiple Attribute Decision-Making Methods [J].
Cereska, Audrius ;
Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras ;
Cavallaro, Fausto ;
Podvezko, Valentinas ;
Tetsman, Ina ;
Grinbergiene, Irina .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2016, 8 (07)
[45]   On generalized similarity measures for Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple attribute decision-making [J].
Verma, Rajkumar ;
Merigo, Jose M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (10) :2556-2583
[46]   AN APPLICATION OF FUZZY MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE. DECISION MAKING METHOD [J].
Muley, A. A. ;
Bajaj, V. H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND STATISTICAL SCIENCES, 2009, 5 (02) :331-334
[47]   A TOPSIS-Based Approach to Multiple Attribute Decision Making with Interval Numbers [J].
Zhang Quan ;
Shun Yue-xin ;
Shu Xiao-dong .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2012 24TH CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE (CCDC), 2012, :3446-3449
[48]   Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making based on regret theory for the evaluation of venture capital projects [J].
Liu, Xiaodi ;
Wang, Zengwen ;
Zhang, Shitao ;
Liu, Jiashu .
ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA, 2020, 33 (01) :672-697
[49]   Method for Multiple Attribute Decision-making under Risk with Interval Numbers [J].
Zhang, Xin ;
Liu, Peide .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2010, 12 (03) :237-242
[50]   A NOVEL TYPE OF FLEXIBLE SOFT ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS TO SOLVE THE MULTIPLE-ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING PROBLEM [J].
Chung, Hsiang-Yu ;
Chang, Kuei-Hu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING-THEORY APPLICATIONS AND PRACTICE, 2023, 30 (02) :536-556