Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making

被引:173
作者
Ataei, Younes [1 ]
Mahmoudi, Amin [2 ]
Feylizadeh, Mohammad Reza [3 ]
Li, Deng-Feng [4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz Branch, Young Researchers & Elite Club, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct & Real Estate, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz Branch, Dept Ind Engn, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiple Attribute Decision-Making; Group Decision-Making; Ordinal Priority Approach; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; MCDM METHODS; SELECTION; AGGREGATION; NORMALIZATION; JUDGMENTS; RANKING; WEIGHT; TOPSIS; MADM;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105893
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The current study aims to present a new method called Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making (MADM). This method can be used in individual or group decision-making (GDM). In the case of GDM, through this method, we first determine the experts and their priorities. The priority of experts may be determined based on their experience and/or knowledge. After prioritization of the experts, the attributes are prioritized by each expert. Meanwhile, each expert ranks the alternatives based on each attribute, and the sub-attributes if any. Ultimately, by solving the presented linear programming model of this method, the weights of the attributes, alternatives, experts, and sub-attributes would be obtained simultaneously. A significant advantage of the proposed method is that it does not make use of pairwise comparison matrix, decision-making matrix (no need for numerical input), normalization methods, averaging methods for aggregating the opinions of experts (in GDM) and linguistic variables. Another advantage of this method is the possibility for experts to only comment on the attributes and alternatives for which they have sufficient knowledge and experience. The validity of the proposed model has been evaluated using several group and individual instances. Finally, the proposed method has been compared with other methods such as AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE and QUALIFLEX. Based on comparisons among the weights and ranks using Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients, the proposed method has an applicable performance compared with other methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   Large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) for performance measurement of healthcare construction projects: Ordinal Priority Approach [J].
Amin Mahmoudi ;
Mehdi Abbasi ;
Jingfeng Yuan ;
Lingzhi Li .
Applied Intelligence, 2022, 52 :13781-13802
[32]   Large-scale group decision-making (LSGDM) for performance measurement of healthcare construction projects: Ordinal Priority Approach [J].
Mahmoudi, Amin ;
Abbasi, Mehdi ;
Yuan, Jingfeng ;
Li, Lingzhi .
APPLIED INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 52 (12) :13781-13802
[33]   Priority degrees for hesitant fuzzy sets: Application to multiple attribute decision making [J].
Lan, Jibin ;
Jin, Ruifang ;
Zheng, Zhaoyi ;
Hu, Mingming .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH PERSPECTIVES, 2017, 4 :67-73
[34]   Am method for multiple-attribute decision-making with incomplete attribute weight information [J].
Zhang, Y ;
Fan, ZP ;
Yu, CH .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOLS 1 AND 2: MODERN INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND INNOVATION IN ENTERPRISE MANAGEMENT, 2005, :645-648
[35]   Multiple-attribute decision-making approach for an energy-efficient facility layout design [J].
Yang, Lei ;
Deuse, Jochen ;
Jiang, Pingyu .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 66 (5-8) :795-807
[36]   Research of Approach to Linguistic Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision-Making with Weights Obtained Based on Satisfaction [J].
Xia, Yaqin ;
Zhu, Rupeng ;
Xia, Yaqin ;
Wu, Xiang .
ICIEA: 2009 4TH IEEE CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ELECTRONICS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-6, 2009, :2796-+
[37]   Multiple attribute decision-making approach based on dual hesitant fuzzy Frank aggregation operators [J].
Tang, Xiaoan ;
Yang, Shanlin ;
Pedrycz, Witold .
APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2018, 68 :525-547
[38]   Link prediction in multiplex networks using a novel multiple-attribute decision-making approach [J].
Luo, Hongsheng ;
Li, Longjie ;
Zhang, Yakun ;
Fang, Shiyu ;
Chen, Xiaoyun .
KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS, 2021, 219
[39]   An extension approach of TOPSIS method with OWAD operator for multiple criteria decision-making [J].
Liu, Xinwang ;
Wang, Li .
GRANULAR COMPUTING, 2020, 5 (01) :135-148
[40]   Conflict resolution in a knowledge-based system using multiple attribute decision-making [J].
Ahn, Byeong Seok ;
Choi, Sang Hyun .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (09) :11552-11558