Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making

被引:163
作者
Ataei, Younes [1 ]
Mahmoudi, Amin [2 ]
Feylizadeh, Mohammad Reza [3 ]
Li, Deng-Feng [4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz Branch, Young Researchers & Elite Club, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct & Real Estate, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz Branch, Dept Ind Engn, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiple Attribute Decision-Making; Group Decision-Making; Ordinal Priority Approach; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; MCDM METHODS; SELECTION; AGGREGATION; NORMALIZATION; JUDGMENTS; RANKING; WEIGHT; TOPSIS; MADM;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105893
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The current study aims to present a new method called Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making (MADM). This method can be used in individual or group decision-making (GDM). In the case of GDM, through this method, we first determine the experts and their priorities. The priority of experts may be determined based on their experience and/or knowledge. After prioritization of the experts, the attributes are prioritized by each expert. Meanwhile, each expert ranks the alternatives based on each attribute, and the sub-attributes if any. Ultimately, by solving the presented linear programming model of this method, the weights of the attributes, alternatives, experts, and sub-attributes would be obtained simultaneously. A significant advantage of the proposed method is that it does not make use of pairwise comparison matrix, decision-making matrix (no need for numerical input), normalization methods, averaging methods for aggregating the opinions of experts (in GDM) and linguistic variables. Another advantage of this method is the possibility for experts to only comment on the attributes and alternatives for which they have sufficient knowledge and experience. The validity of the proposed model has been evaluated using several group and individual instances. Finally, the proposed method has been compared with other methods such as AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE and QUALIFLEX. Based on comparisons among the weights and ranks using Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients, the proposed method has an applicable performance compared with other methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AN INTRODUCTION TO PROSPECTIVE MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION MAKING (PMADM)
    Hashemkhani Zolfani, Sarfaraz
    Maknoon, Reza
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    TECHNOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF ECONOMY, 2016, 22 (02) : 309 - 326
  • [22] A Taxonomy for Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Literature
    Ervural, Bilal
    Kabak, Ozgur
    2015 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUZZY SYSTEMS (FUZZ-IEEE 2015), 2015,
  • [23] Multiple attribute decision-making based on Fermatean fuzzy number
    Fahmi, Aliya
    Amin, Fazli
    Eldin, Sayed M.
    Shutaywi, Meshal
    Deebani, Wejdan
    Al Sulaie, Saleh
    AIMS MATHEMATICS, 2023, 8 (05): : 10835 - 10863
  • [24] Research on dynamic multiple attribute decision-making with interval numbers
    Chu, Ping
    Dai, Wenzhan
    WCICA 2006: SIXTH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-12, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 6979 - +
  • [25] Decision field theory-combined multi-attribute group decision-making method for incomplete linear ordinal ranking
    Liu, Nana
    Xu, Zeshui
    Wu, Hangyao
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 140
  • [26] The Multiple Attribute Decision-Making VIKOR Method and Its Application
    Wei, Jingzhu
    Lin, Xiangyi
    2008 4TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS, NETWORKING AND MOBILE COMPUTING, VOLS 1-31, 2008, : 11925 - 11928
  • [27] Dominance degrees for intervals and their application in multiple attribute decision-making
    Lan, Jibin
    Zou, Haiyan
    Hu, Mingming
    FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 2020, 383 : 146 - 164
  • [28] ON SOLVING SOME TYPES OF MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE DECISION-MAKING PROBLEMS
    Vaduva, Ion
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC FORECASTING, 2012, 15 (01): : 41 - 61
  • [29] An Approach to Linguistic Multiple Attribute Decision Making based on Superiority Possibility
    Zhang, Quan
    Jin, Peng
    Wang, JingWei
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON RESEARCH CHALLENGES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, ICRCCS 2009, 2009, : 28 - +
  • [30] Selection of an appropriate wastewater treatment technology: A scenario-based multiple-attribute decision-making approach
    Kalbar, Pradip P.
    Karmakar, Subhankar
    Asolekar, Shyam R.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 113 : 158 - 169