Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making

被引:174
作者
Ataei, Younes [1 ]
Mahmoudi, Amin [2 ]
Feylizadeh, Mohammad Reza [3 ]
Li, Deng-Feng [4 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz Branch, Young Researchers & Elite Club, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Dept Construct & Real Estate, Nanjing 211189, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[3] Islamic Azad Univ, Shiraz Branch, Dept Ind Engn, Shiraz, Iran
[4] Univ Elect Sci & Technol China, Sch Management & Econ, Chengdu 611731, Sichuan, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Multiple Attribute Decision-Making; Group Decision-Making; Ordinal Priority Approach; ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS; MCDM METHODS; SELECTION; AGGREGATION; NORMALIZATION; JUDGMENTS; RANKING; WEIGHT; TOPSIS; MADM;
D O I
10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105893
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
The current study aims to present a new method called Ordinal Priority Approach (OPA) in Multiple Attribute Decision-Making (MADM). This method can be used in individual or group decision-making (GDM). In the case of GDM, through this method, we first determine the experts and their priorities. The priority of experts may be determined based on their experience and/or knowledge. After prioritization of the experts, the attributes are prioritized by each expert. Meanwhile, each expert ranks the alternatives based on each attribute, and the sub-attributes if any. Ultimately, by solving the presented linear programming model of this method, the weights of the attributes, alternatives, experts, and sub-attributes would be obtained simultaneously. A significant advantage of the proposed method is that it does not make use of pairwise comparison matrix, decision-making matrix (no need for numerical input), normalization methods, averaging methods for aggregating the opinions of experts (in GDM) and linguistic variables. Another advantage of this method is the possibility for experts to only comment on the attributes and alternatives for which they have sufficient knowledge and experience. The validity of the proposed model has been evaluated using several group and individual instances. Finally, the proposed method has been compared with other methods such as AHP, BWM, TOPSIS, VIKOR, PROMETHEE and QUALIFLEX. Based on comparisons among the weights and ranks using Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients, the proposed method has an applicable performance compared with other methods. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Nonparametric Statistical Inference
[2]  
Asgharpour MJ, 2003, GROUP DECISION MAKIN
[3]   Use of analytic network process in vendor selection decisions [J].
Bayazit, Ozden .
BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2006, 13 (05) :566-+
[4]  
Brans J. P., 1984, Operational Reseach '84. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference, P477
[5]   Confidence in aggregation of expert opinions [J].
Budescu, DV ;
Rantilla, AK .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2000, 104 (03) :371-398
[6]   Application of decision-making techniques in supplier selection: A systematic review of literature [J].
Chai, Junyi ;
Liu, James N. K. ;
Ngai, Eric W. T. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2013, 40 (10) :3872-3885
[7]   AN APPROXIMATE MEASURE OF VALUE [J].
CHURCHMAN, CW ;
ACKOFF, RL .
JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONS RESEARCH SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1954, 2 (02) :172-187
[8]  
Corder GW., 2014, NONPARAMETRIC STAT S
[9]  
Gomes L. F. A. M., 1991, Foundations of Computing and Decision Sciences, V16, P113
[10]  
Hogarth RobinM., 1977, Decision Making and Change in Human Affairs, P231