Validating Patient-Specific Finite Element Models of Direct Electrocortical Stimulation

被引:4
作者
Charlebois, Chantel M. [1 ,2 ]
Caldwell, David J. [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Rampersad, Sumientra M. [6 ]
Janson, Andrew P. [1 ,2 ]
Ojemann, Jeffrey G. [7 ]
Brooks, Dana H. [6 ]
MacLeod, Rob S. [1 ,2 ]
Butson, Christopher R. [1 ,2 ,8 ]
Dorval, Alan D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utah, Dept Biomed Engn, Salt Lake City, UT 84112 USA
[2] Univ Utah, Sci Comp & Imaging SCI Inst, Salt Lake City, UT USA
[3] Univ Washington, Dept Bioengn, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Ctr Neurotechnol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Med Scientist Training Program, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Northeastern Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Univ Washington, Dept Neurol Surg, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[8] Univ Utah, Dept Neurol Neurosurg & Psychiat, Salt Lake City, UT USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
direct electrocortical stimulation; electrocorticography; finite element modeling; bioelectricity simulation; patient-specific modeling; MOTOR CORTEX STIMULATION; SUBDURAL CORTICAL STIMULATION; BRAIN MAPPING TECHNIQUES; ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; LOCALIZATION; ELECTRODES; EPILEPSY; STROKE; MULTICENTER; IMPEDANCE;
D O I
10.3389/fnins.2021.691701
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Direct electrocortical stimulation (DECS) with electrocorticography electrodes is an established therapy for epilepsy and an emerging application for stroke rehabilitation and brain-computer interfaces. However, the electrophysiological mechanisms that result in a therapeutic effect remain unclear. Patient-specific computational models are promising tools to predict the voltages in the brain and better understand the neural and clinical response to DECS, but the accuracy of such models has not been directly validated in humans. A key hurdle to modeling DECS is accurately locating the electrodes on the cortical surface due to brain shift after electrode implantation. Despite the inherent uncertainty introduced by brain shift, the effects of electrode localization parameters have not been investigated. The goal of this study was to validate patient-specific computational models of DECS against in vivo voltage recordings obtained during DECS and quantify the effects of electrode localization parameters on simulated voltages on the cortical surface. We measured intracranial voltages in six epilepsy patients during DECS and investigated the following electrode localization parameters: principal axis, Hermes, and Dykstra electrode projection methods combined with 0, 1, and 2 mm of cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) below the electrodes. Greater CSF depth between the electrode and cortical surface increased model errors and decreased predicted voltage accuracy. The electrode localization parameters that best estimated the recorded voltages across six patients with varying amounts of brain shift were the Hermes projection method and a CSF depth of 0 mm (r = 0.92 and linear regression slope = 1.21). These results are the first to quantify the effects of electrode localization parameters with in vivo intracranial recordings and may serve as the basis for future studies investigating the neuronal and clinical effects of DECS for epilepsy, stroke, and other emerging closed-loop applications.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 71 条
[41]   Computational Study on Subdural Cortical Stimulation - The Influence of the Head Geometry, Anisotropic Conductivity, and Electrode Configuration [J].
Kim, Donghyeon ;
Seo, Hyeon ;
Kim, Hyoung-Ihl ;
Jun, Sung Chan .
PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09)
[42]  
Kim D, 2012, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P867, DOI 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346069
[43]  
Kim DY, 2011, IEEE ENG MED BIO, P7226, DOI 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091826
[44]   A cognitive neuroprosthetic that uses cortical stimulation for somatosensory feedback [J].
Klaes, Christian ;
Shi, Ying ;
Kellis, Spencer ;
Minxha, Juri ;
Revechkis, Boris ;
Andersen, Richard A. .
JOURNAL OF NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2014, 11 (05)
[45]   3D visualization of subdural electrode shift as measured at craniotomy reopening [J].
LaViolette, Peter S. ;
Rand, Scott D. ;
Ellingson, Benjamin M. ;
Raghavan, Manoj ;
Lew, Sean M. ;
Schmainda, Kathleen M. ;
Mueller, Wade .
EPILEPSY RESEARCH, 2011, 94 (1-2) :102-109
[46]   Cortical stimulation for the rehabilitation of patients with hemiparetic stroke: a multicenter feasibility study of safety and efficacy [J].
Levy, Robert ;
Ruland, Sean ;
Weinand, Martin ;
Lowry, David ;
Dafer, Rima ;
Bakay, Roy .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 108 (04) :707-714
[47]   Epidural Electrical Stimulation for Stroke Rehabilitation: Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Single-Blinded Everest Trial [J].
Levy, Robert M. ;
Harvey, Richard L. ;
Kissela, Brett M. ;
Winstein, Carolee J. ;
Lutsep, Helmi L. ;
Parrish, Todd B. ;
Cramer, Steven C. ;
Venkatesan, Lalit .
NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2016, 30 (02) :107-119
[48]   NEUROMODULATION OF EPILEPTIC FOCI IN PATIENTS WITH NON-LESIONAL REFRACTORY MOTOR EPILEPSY [J].
Luisa Velasco, Ana ;
Velasco, Francisco ;
Velasco, Marcos ;
Maria Nunez, Jose ;
Trejo, David ;
Garcia, Israel .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEURAL SYSTEMS, 2009, 19 (03) :139-147
[49]   Chronic Subthreshold Cortical Stimulation to Treat Focal Epilepsy [J].
Lundstrom, Brian Nils ;
Van Gompel, Jamie ;
Britton, Jeffrey ;
Nickels, Katherine ;
Wetjen, Nicholas ;
Worrell, Gregory ;
Stead, Matt .
JAMA NEUROLOGY, 2016, 73 (11) :1369-1372
[50]   Modelling motor cortex stimulation for chronic pain control: electrical potential field, activating functions and responses of simple nerve fibre models [J].
Manola, L ;
Roelofsen, BH ;
Holsheimer, J ;
Marani, E ;
Geelen, J .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 2005, 43 (03) :335-343