Perfluorinated alkyl substances: Sewage treatment and implications for receiving waters

被引:3
作者
Comber, S. D. W. [1 ]
Gardner, M. J. [2 ]
Ellor, B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Plymouth Univ, B525 Portland Sq,Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, Devon, England
[2] Atkins Ltd, 500,Pk Ave,Aztec West, Bristol BS32 4RZ, Avon, England
[3] UK Water Ind Res, 36 Broadway, London, England
关键词
PFAS; Wastewater treatment works; Removal; PFOS; PFOA; Rivers; PERFLUOROALKYL SUBSTANCES; RIVER-BASIN; PFOA; EMISSIONS; TRANSPORT; TOXICITY; TRENDS; FATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148391
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study comprises a detailed analysis of data for perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS), and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) for over 600 wastewater treatment works effluents (WwTW) as well as samples upstream and downstream of each discharge of effluent into its receiving water. This has allowed an investigation of not only the effectiveness of removal of the perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) compounds during wastewater treatment but also implications for compliance with the environmental quality standard (EQS) set for PFOS under the Water Framework Directive. It is shown that effluents contain concentrations of PFOS that exceed the annual average EQS by a factor between 1.1-fold and 40-fold. The corresponding factors for PFOA are between 2-fold and 22-fold. The presence of high concentrations upstream, means that between a quarter and a third of individual effluents are found to reduce the concentration of fluorocarbons in the river downstream of the discharge point. The elevated concentrations upstream of the studied wastewater treatment works suggest inputs of these perfluoro compounds into the aquatic environment are ubiquitous and therefore difficult to address from simply setting permit conditions for individual WwTW. The freshwater EQS set for PFOS is based on several worst-case accumulation coefficients and large safety factors, which, when combined, result in a sub ng/L EQS. Consequently, the use of the biota derived quality standard may be a more realistic measure of environmental risk. It may be prudent, to assess the effectiveness of controls implemented in the last few years before considering widespread end-of-pipe treatment. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   Review on the occurrence, fate and removal of perfluorinated compounds during wastewater treatment [J].
Arvaniti, Olga S. ;
Stasinakis, Athanasios S. .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 524 :81-92
[2]  
Canada.ca, 2019, FACTSH PROH CERT TOX
[3]   Perfluoroalkyl substances and fish consumption [J].
Christensen, Krista Y. ;
Raymond, Michelle ;
Blackowicz, Michael ;
Liu, Yangyang ;
Thompson, Brooke A. ;
Anderson, Henry A. ;
Turyk, Mary .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH, 2017, 154 :145-151
[4]   LOCALLY WEIGHTED REGRESSION - AN APPROACH TO REGRESSION-ANALYSIS BY LOCAL FITTING [J].
CLEVELAND, WS ;
DEVLIN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1988, 83 (403) :596-610
[5]  
Comber SDW, 2020, ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP, V22, P1865, DOI [10.1039/D0EM00137F, 10.1039/d0em00137f]
[6]  
EA Environment Agency, 2007, INV PFOS OTH PERFL G
[7]  
EC, 2017, COMM REG EU 2017 100
[8]  
ECHA, 2014, ANN 15 RESTR REP PRO
[9]  
ECHA, 2015, ECHARACRESO000000622
[10]  
ECHA, 2020, PERFL CHEM PFAS ECHA