Ultrasound-Guided versus Thoracoscopic Pleural Biopsy for Diagnosing Tuberculous Pleurisy Following Inconclusive Thoracentesis: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

被引:8
|
作者
Zhou, Xiaoyu [1 ]
Jiang, Peng [1 ,2 ]
Huan, Xia [3 ]
Li, Wei [1 ]
Chen, Yuqing [1 ]
Gao, Hua [1 ]
Qi, Xueyuan [1 ]
Wu, Jing [1 ]
Wang, Xiaojing [1 ]
Ou, Yurong [4 ]
Jia, Xianjie [5 ]
机构
[1] Bengbu Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Resp Med, Bengbu, Anhui, Peoples R China
[2] Peoples Hosp Huainan, Dept Resp Med, Huainan, Anhui, Peoples R China
[3] Peoples Hosp Shannan, Dept Resp Med, Tibet, Shannan, Peoples R China
[4] Bengbu Med Coll, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Pathol, Bengbu, Anhui, Peoples R China
[5] Bengbu Med Coll, Dept Epidemiol, Bengbu, Anhui, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR | 2018年 / 24卷
关键词
Biopsy; Pleural Diseases; Sound; Thoracoscopy; Tuberculosis; Avian; MEDICAL THORACOSCOPY; ABRAMS NEEDLE; THORACIC ULTRASOUND; XPERT MTB/RIF; DISEASE; EFFUSION; YIELD; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; ASPIRATION;
D O I
10.12659/MSM.912506
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Traditional diagnostic methods for tuberculosis (TB) cannot be reliably applied to tuberculous pleurisy. Therefore, this prospective, randomized, controlled trial was performed to compare the diagnostic sensitivity and safety of ultrasound-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy versus thoracoscopic pleural biopsy in patients suspected of tuberculous pleurisy following inconclusive thoracentesis. Material/Methods: A total of 196 adult patients with acid-fast bacillus (AFB)-negative exudative pleural effusions clinically suspected of tuberculous pleurisy were recruited. Enrollees were randomized into 2 cohorts: ultrasound-guided cutting-needle pleural biopsy (n=96) or thoracoscopic pleural biopsy (n=96). The overall diagnostic yields, diagnostic sensitivities for tuberculous pleurisy, and post-procedural complications for both cohorts were statistically compared. Results: Ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy displayed an overall diagnostic yield of 83%, while thorascopic pleural biopsy displayed a similar overall diagnostic yield of 86% (chi(2) =1.88, df=1, p=0.17). There were 127 patients conclusively diagnosed with tuberculous pleurisy, resulting in a tuberculous pleurisy prevalence of 65% in this patient population (66% in the ultrasound cohort vs. 63% in the thoracoscopy cohort; p>0.05). Ultrasound-guided pleural biopsy displayed a sensitivity of 82% in detecting tuberculous pleurisy, while thorascopic pleural biopsy displayed a similar sensitivity of 90% (chi(2) =1.05, df=1, p=0.30). The sensitivities of these 2 modalities did not significantly differ based on the degree of pleural thickening (p>0.05). Post-procedural complications were minor. Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided and thoracoscopic pleural biopsy both display strong (>80%) but statistically similar over- all diagnostic yields for diagnosing pleural effusions following inconclusive thoracentesis. Both modalities also display strong (>80%) but statistically similar sensitivities in detecting tuberculous pleurisy.
引用
收藏
页码:7238 / 7248
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The effect of ultrasound-guided compression immediately after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy on postbiopsy bleeding: a randomized controlled pilot study
    Park, Bong Hee
    Kim, Jung Im
    Bae, Sang Rak
    Lee, Yong Seok
    Kang, Sung Hak
    Han, Chang Hee
    INTERNATIONAL UROLOGY AND NEPHROLOGY, 2017, 49 (08) : 1319 - 1325
  • [42] The effect of ultrasound-guided compression immediately after transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy on postbiopsy bleeding: a randomized controlled pilot study
    Bong Hee Park
    Jung Im Kim
    Sang Rak Bae
    Yong Seok Lee
    Sung Hak Kang
    Chang Hee Han
    International Urology and Nephrology, 2017, 49 : 1319 - 1325
  • [43] Comaparison of conventional and ultrasound-guided needle biopsy techniques in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis: a randomized trial
    Gnass, Maciej
    Szlubowski, Artur
    Soja, Jerzy
    Kocon, Piotr
    Rudnicka, Lucyna
    Cmiel, Adam
    Sladek, Krzysztof
    Kuzdzal, Jaroslaw
    POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 125 (05): : 321 - 328
  • [44] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle core biopsy versus aspiration for gastrointestinal mass lesions: A randomized trial.
    Nguyen, Nam Q.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (04)
  • [45] Endoscopic ultrasound-guided versus percutaneous liver biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Santo, Paula Arruda do Espirito
    Meine, Gilmara Coelho
    Nau, Angelica Luciana
    Barbosa, Eduardo Cerchi
    Baraldo, Stefano
    Lenz, Luciano
    Maluf-Filho, Fauze
    ENDOSCOPY, 2025, 57 (01) : 41 - 48
  • [46] Ultrasound-guided peripheral intravenous access in adults: A randomized crossover controlled trial
    Kuo, Chia-Chi
    Lee, Wei-Jing
    Ke, Ya-Ting
    INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY NURSING, 2025, 79
  • [47] Scale ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation in infant: A randomized controlled trial
    Yang, Fei
    Li, Shangyingying
    Chen, Hang
    Jiang, Rui
    Wang, Xuanqin
    Wang, Weiping
    Shi, Yuan
    Liu, Lifei
    Guo, Hongjie
    Ye, Mao
    Tu, Shengfen
    Wang, Qiang
    Wang, Hong
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR ACCESS, 2023, 24 (02): : 205 - 212
  • [48] A randomized controlled trial of ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency for patients with frozen shoulder
    Yan, Juan
    Zhang, Xian-min
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (01)
  • [49] Performance of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Versus Percutaneous Liver Biopsy in Diagnosing Stage 3–4 Fibrosis
    Alyssa Y. Choi
    Xiaodong Li
    Wenchang Guo
    Vishal S. Chandan
    Jason Samarasena
    John G. Lee
    Kenneth J. Chang
    Ke-Qin Hu
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2023, 68 : 3774 - 3780
  • [50] Combined Approach Versus 2 Conventional Approaches in Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Takeshita, Jun
    Nishiyama, Kei
    Fukumoto, Atsushi
    Shime, Nobuaki
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2019, 33 (11) : 2979 - 2984