Performance-driven vulnerability analysis of infrastructure systems

被引:5
作者
Vatenmacher, M. [1 ]
Svoray, T. [1 ,2 ]
Tsesarsky, M. [3 ,4 ]
Isaac, S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Geog & Environm Dev, Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Psychol, Beer Sheva, Israel
[3] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Beer Sheva, Israel
[4] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Earth & Environm Sci, Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
Vulnerability analysis; Infrastructure systems; GIS; Earthquakes; DISASTER MANAGEMENT; EARTHQUAKE HAZARD; RESILIENCE; FRAMEWORK; RISK; SIMULATION; GIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103031
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
In this research we suggest a novel approach that reduces the complexity of vulnerability analysis of infrastructure systems, by addressing the vital information necessary for decision makers and avoiding an exhaustive analysis of data that is ultimately irrelevant. This objective is achieved by framing the vulnerability analysis as part of a decision-making process, thus focusing on clear and quantifiable requirements of specific essential end-users, and assessing under which particular circumstances these requirements are no longer satisfied by the infrastructure systems that support the end users' activities. Methodically, this is made possible by reversing the process through which the vulnerability of infrastructure systems is typically analysed and identifying specific minimum threshold states in which critical supplies will be interrupted to reveal the critical components in supply chains. This reduction in the complexity of vulnerability analysis also allows the consideration of highly relevant information that may currently be ignored to avoid an excessive computational burden. To test its feasibility, the approach was implemented in a synthetic, though realistic case study of an analysis of the vulnerability of a healthcare system to seismic hazards. This enabled the identification of several potential threats to the healthcare system's continued performance following future earthquakes.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Analytics-based decision-making for service systems: A qualitative study and agenda for future research [J].
Akter, Shahriar ;
Bandara, Ruwan ;
Hani, Umme ;
Wamba, Samuel Fosso ;
Foropon, Cyril ;
Papadopoulos, Thanos .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 48 :85-95
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, SHAPING CONTINENTAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1985, EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE EV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2002, APPL TECHNOLOGY COUN
[5]   A screening methodology for the identification and ranking of infrastructure vulnerabilities due to terrorism [J].
Apostolakis, GE ;
Lemon, DM .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2005, 25 (02) :361-376
[6]   Multi-criteria vulnerability analysis to earthquake hazard of Bucharest, Romania [J].
Armas, Iuliana .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 63 (02) :1129-1156
[7]   Did you feel it? Intensity data: A surprisingly good measure of earthquake ground motion [J].
Atkinson, Gail M. ;
Wald, David J. .
SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2007, 78 (03) :362-368
[8]   Suitability estimation for urban development using multi-hazard assessment map [J].
Bathrellos, George D. ;
Skilodimou, Hariklia D. ;
Chousianitis, Konstantinos ;
Youssef, Ahmed M. ;
Pradhan, Biswajeet .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 575 :119-134
[9]   Preparing for complex interdependent risks: A System of Systems approach to building disaster resilience [J].
Cavallo, Antonella ;
Ireland, Vernon .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2014, 9 :181-193
[10]   Seismic resilience of a hospital system [J].
Cimellaro, Gian Paolo ;
Reinhorn, Andrei M. ;
Bruneau, Michel .
STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2010, 6 (1-2) :127-144