Optimisation of movement detection and artifact removal during laser speckle contrast imaging

被引:32
作者
Omarjee, Loukman [1 ]
Signolet, Isabelle [1 ]
Humeau-Heutier, Anne [2 ]
Martin, Ludovic [3 ,4 ]
Henrion, Daniel [3 ]
Abraham, Pierre [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp, Lab Physiol Vasc Invest, F-49933 Angers 09, France
[2] Univ Angers, LUNAM Univ, LISA, F-49045 Angers, France
[3] Univ Angers, INSERM, CNR5 UMR 6214, UFR Med,U1083, F-49045 Angers, France
[4] Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, F-49933 Angers 09, France
关键词
Laser speckle contrast imaging; Noise; Microcirculation; Blood flow; Signal processing; MICROVASCULAR REACTIVITY; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.mvr.2014.09.005
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Introduction: Laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) allows an easy non-contact monitoring of the cutaneous blood flow (CBF), but is highly sensitive to movement artifacts (ARTm). Subtraction of a signal recorded on an adhesive opaque surface (AOS) close to the area of interest was reported as a mean of reducing noise from the raw skin LSCI (LSCIsk) signal, provided an individual calibration was performed. Assuming that AOS = a . CBF + b . ARTm, an ideal patch should completely block the light reflection due to CBF and thus be insensitive to skin blood flow changes ("a" similar to 0), while keeping a reflection signal amplitude similar to the one from the skin in case of artifact ("b" similar to 1). This ideal AOS has not been determined and may discriminate flow from movements during LSCI recordings. Materials and methods: We tested different AOSs to determine their "a" and "b" parameters in 35 and 34 healthy volunteers, respectively. The AOS surface providing results as close as possible to an ideal AOS, was used for a point-by-point de-noising of post occlusive reactive hyperemia (PORH) on two different days in 15 new subjects. Correlation of raw, smoothed (average smoothing over 1 s intervals) and denoised signals was tested through a cross-correlation analysis of the two POHR tests. Results: The optimal "a" and "b" values were obtained with a homemade bilayer adhesive patch (a = 0.06 +/- 0.05 and b = 1.03 +/- 0.17) whereas other tested AOS had "a" values ranging from 0.05 to 023 and "b" values ranging from 2.69 to 3.82. Using the bilayer adhesive patch the cross-correlation between the two tests of POHR increased from 0330 +/- 0.128 for raw, to 0.461 +/- 0.168 for smoothed and 0.649 +/- 0.128 for denoised signals respectively (p < 0.05 from raw coefficients). Conclusion: The home-made bilayer adhesive seems the optimal AOS for the removal of ARTm from the LSCIsk signal while respecting CBF signal. This specific AOS allows for an efficient de-noising of LSCI measurements without the need for individual calibration. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 80
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Microvascular blood flow monitoring with laser speckle contrast imaging using the generalized differences algorithm [J].
Humeau-Heurtier, Anne ;
Mahe, Guillaume ;
Abraham, Pierre .
MICROVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2015, 98 :54-61
[42]   Multiscale Poincare plot analysis of time series from laser speckle contrast imaging data [J].
Humeau-Heurtier, Anne ;
Mahe, Guillaume ;
Hunault, Gilles ;
Gascoin, Lydie ;
Abraham, Pierre .
BIOMEDICAL SIGNAL PROCESSING AND CONTROL, 2017, 38 :361-369
[43]   Laser speckle contrast imaging for measuring blood flow [J].
Briers, J. David .
OPTICA APPLICATA, 2007, 37 (1-2) :139-152
[44]   Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging of flow in a microfluidic device [J].
Parthasarathy, Ashwin B. ;
Shin, Weon Gyu ;
Zhang, X. J. ;
Dunn, A. K. .
BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS OF LIGHT SCATTERING, 2007, 6446
[45]   Application of laser speckle contrast imaging in laparoscopic surgery [J].
Heeman, Wido ;
Dijkstra, Klaas ;
Hoff, Christiaan ;
Koopal, Sietze ;
Pierie, Jean-Pierre ;
Bouma, Hessel ;
Boerma, E. Christiaan .
BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2019, 10 (04) :2010-2019
[46]   Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging for the Quantitative Assessment of Flow [J].
Duncan, Donald D. ;
Kirkpatrick, Sean J. ;
Gladish, James C. ;
Hurst, Sawan A. .
DYNAMICS AND FLUCTUATIONS IN BIOMEDICAL PHOTONICS VI, 2009, 7176
[47]   Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging of Cerebral Blood Flow [J].
Andrew K. Dunn .
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2012, 40 :367-377
[48]   Laser Speckle Contrast Imaging for Plant and Seed Characterization [J].
Kalibhat, Raghunandan ;
Kulkarni, Rishikesh ;
Mondal, Pranab Kumar .
2024 IEEE APPLIED SENSING CONFERENCE, APSCON, 2024,
[49]   Laser speckle contrast imaging is sensitive to advective flux [J].
Khaksari, Kosar ;
Kirkpatrick, Sean J. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 2016, 21 (07)
[50]   Effect of vascular structure on laser speckle contrast imaging [J].
Jafari, Chakameh Z. ;
Sullender, Colin T. ;
Miller, David R. ;
Mihelic, Samuel A. ;
Dunn, Andrew K. .
BIOMEDICAL OPTICS EXPRESS, 2020, 11 (10) :5826-5841