Diverse perspectives on aquaculture development in Maine

被引:8
作者
Britsch, Melissa L. [1 ,2 ]
Leslie, Heather M. [1 ,2 ]
Stoll, Joshua S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maine, Darling Marine Ctr, Walpole, ME 04573 USA
[2] Univ Maine, Sch Marine Sci, Orono, ME 04469 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Aquaculture; Blue growth; Maine; Q method; Values; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSERVATION; REVOLUTION; VALUES; PATH;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpol.2021.104697
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
As aquaculture production continues to increase worldwide, important questions are emerging about the motivations of growth and who stands to benefit. We use Q method to identify perspectives associated with marine aquaculture development in Maine, where aquaculture expansion in the United States has become a central focus. We used newspaper articles about aquaculture in Maine covering a 25-year period to inform the development of the Q study and participants included industry members, researchers, mangers, and other local experts. We identify four perspectives on aquaculture development based on the values individuals ascribe to the growth of the sector. We label these perspectives as: (1) aquaculture optimists, (2) aquaculture anchors, (3) aquaculture historians, and (4) aquaculture agnostics. Although the aquaculture sector is poised to expand in Maine, our findings suggest that there are material differences in the values associated with aquaculture growth, which may not be entirely compatible. By understanding the heterogeneity of perspectives surrounding aquaculture development in Maine, we aim to contribute to ongoing discussions about the future of aquaculture and encourage a more explicit articulation of the intended outcomes of aquaculture development and who it will serve.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 76 条
  • [11] Seeking stakeholder consensus within Ireland's conflicted salmon aquaculture space
    Carr, Liam M.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2019, 99 : 201 - 212
  • [12] "It's About Seeing What's Actually Out There": Quantifying fishers' ecological knowledge and biases in a small-scale commercial fishery as a path toward co-management
    Carr, Liam M.
    Heyman, William D.
    [J]. OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2012, 69 : 118 - 132
  • [13] CHRISTY FT, 1975, NAT RESOUR J, V15, P695
  • [14] Cole A., 2016, Maine Aquaculture Economic Impact Report
  • [15] Conover S., 2007, The Last 20 Miles-Mapping Maine's Working Waterfront
  • [16] Coombs M., 2020, STATE MAINES WORKING
  • [17] The future of food from the sea
    Costello, Christopher
    Cao, Ling
    Gelcich, Stefan
    Cisneros-Mata, Miguel A.
    Free, Christopher M.
    Froehlich, Halley E.
    Golden, Christopher D.
    Ishimura, Gakushi
    Maier, Jason
    Macadam-Somer, Ilan
    Mangin, Tracey
    Melnychuk, Michael C.
    Miyahara, Masanori
    de Moor, Carryn L.
    Naylor, Rosamond
    Nostbakken, Linda
    Ojea, Elena
    O'Reilly, Erin
    Parma, Ana M.
    Plantinga, Andrew J.
    Thilsted, Shakuntala H.
    Lubchenco, Jane
    [J]. NATURE, 2020, 588 (7836) : 95 - +
  • [18] Sustainability -: Resolving mismatches in US ocean governance
    Crowder, L. B.
    Osherenko, G.
    Young, O. R.
    Airame, S.
    Norse, E. A.
    Baron, N.
    Day, J. C.
    Bouvere, F.
    Ehler, C. N.
    Halpern, B. S.
    Langdon, S. J.
    McLeod, K. L.
    Ogden, J. C.
    Peach, R. E.
    Rosenberg, A. A.
    Wilson, J. A.
    [J]. SCIENCE, 2006, 313 (5787) : 617 - 618
  • [19] Comprehensive plans as tools for enhancing coastal community resilience
    Cucuzza, Marina
    Stoll, Joshua S.
    Leslie, Heather M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 63 (11) : 2022 - 2041
  • [20] Shifting environmental perspectives in agriculture: Repeated Q analysis and the stability of preference structures
    Davies, Ben B.
    Hodge, Ian D.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 83 : 51 - 57