The effect of field margins on the yield of sugar beet and cereal crops

被引:44
|
作者
Sparkes, DL
Jaggard, KW
Ramsden, SJ
Scott, RK
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Biol Sci, Div Agr & Hort, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leics, England
[2] IACR Brooms Barn, Bury St Edmunds IP28 6NP, Suffolk, England
关键词
wheat; barley; sugar beet; headland; field margin;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-7348.1998.tb05190.x
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The effect of field margins on the yield of sugar beet, wheat and barley was studied on commercial farms and in a series of field experiments from 1992-1997. There was always a trend of increasing yield from the edge of the field to the centre, with a marked reduction around the 'tramlines' and the area where machinery turns. In the studies on commercial farms, headland yield loss varied widely. In sugar beet the headlands yielded 19-41% less than the centre, with a mean reduction of 26%. In cereals the range was 3-19%, with a mean loss of 7%. Headland yield reductions were generally smaller in the field experiments than those found on commercial farms. These headland effects did not move towards the centre of the field when grass margins were planted at the edge of the field; there was no significant effect on the yield of the adjacent crop. The presence of boundary trees had the greatest effect on yield: in the outer 9 m of the field, the area shaded by trees produced 4.4 t ha(-1) of wheat, and the area that was not shaded 8.1 t ha(-1). Turning of machinery also significantly reduced yield, while grazing by rabbits and hares surprisingly had no effect. Following the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy in 1992, the main effect of which was to change from a price support policy to direct payments to producers, farmers in the European Union who produce more than a specified tonnage of 'eligible crops' per year, are required to fallow a given percentage of their land (currently 5%), to qualify for Arable Area Payments. Growers can elect to fallow fields on a rotational basis, or permanently. Headland set-aside is a term used to describe strips of set-aside, a minimum of 20 m wide around the edges of fields. In these experiments, the headland effect did not extend beyond 20 m from the field edge. Therefore, particularly in fields with boundary hedges or trees, headland set-aside could effectively remove the poor-yielding area at the field margin.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 142
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] EFFECT OF SULPHUR FERTILISATION ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET ROOTS
    Ryant, Pavel
    Antosovsky, Jiri
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2022, 138 (5-6): : 185 - 189
  • [42] Effect of water quality on yield of sugar beet and sweet sorghum
    Almodares, A
    Sharif, ME
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL BIOLOGY, 2005, 26 (03): : 487 - 493
  • [43] Effect of Extending the Growing Period on Yield Formation of Sugar Beet
    Schnepel, K.
    Hoffmann, C. M.
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE, 2016, 202 (06) : 530 - 541
  • [44] The effect of growth regulators on the yield and quality of sugar beet roots
    Pulkrábek, J
    Sroller, J
    Zahradnícek, J
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1999, 45 (08): : 379 - 386
  • [45] SULFUR EFFECT ON YIELD AND FEEDING VALUE OF SUGAR-BEET
    KHOMENKO, AD
    SINELNIK, AD
    FIZIOLOGIYA I BIOKHIMIYA KULTURNYKH RASTENII, 1982, 14 (04): : 362 - 365
  • [46] EFFECT OF VIRUS YELLOWS ON YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET SEED
    HILLS, OA
    BENNETT, CW
    JEWELL, HK
    COUDRIET, DL
    BRUBAKER, RW
    JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC ENTOMOLOGY, 1960, 53 (01) : 162 - 164
  • [47] Effect of different fertilizers on the yield and economy of sugar beet in 2015
    Dovrtelova, Hana
    Smutny, Vladimir
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2016, 132 (03): : 92 - 94
  • [48] EFFECT OF BORON APPLICATION ON YIELD AND TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY OF SUGAR BEET
    Hrivna, Ludek
    Pechkova, Jana
    Buresova, Iva
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2014, 130 (04): : 126 - 130
  • [49] EFFECT OF SOWING DATE AND HARVESTING DATE ON YIELD OF SUGAR BEET
    HULL, R
    WEBB, DJ
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1970, 75 : 223 - +
  • [50] NEW CROPS Drought tolerant sugar beet
    Cozier, Muriel
    BIOFUELS BIOPRODUCTS & BIOREFINING-BIOFPR, 2007, 1 (03): : 172 - 172