The effect of field margins on the yield of sugar beet and cereal crops

被引:44
|
作者
Sparkes, DL
Jaggard, KW
Ramsden, SJ
Scott, RK
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Sch Biol Sci, Div Agr & Hort, Loughborough LE12 5RD, Leics, England
[2] IACR Brooms Barn, Bury St Edmunds IP28 6NP, Suffolk, England
关键词
wheat; barley; sugar beet; headland; field margin;
D O I
10.1111/j.1744-7348.1998.tb05190.x
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
The effect of field margins on the yield of sugar beet, wheat and barley was studied on commercial farms and in a series of field experiments from 1992-1997. There was always a trend of increasing yield from the edge of the field to the centre, with a marked reduction around the 'tramlines' and the area where machinery turns. In the studies on commercial farms, headland yield loss varied widely. In sugar beet the headlands yielded 19-41% less than the centre, with a mean reduction of 26%. In cereals the range was 3-19%, with a mean loss of 7%. Headland yield reductions were generally smaller in the field experiments than those found on commercial farms. These headland effects did not move towards the centre of the field when grass margins were planted at the edge of the field; there was no significant effect on the yield of the adjacent crop. The presence of boundary trees had the greatest effect on yield: in the outer 9 m of the field, the area shaded by trees produced 4.4 t ha(-1) of wheat, and the area that was not shaded 8.1 t ha(-1). Turning of machinery also significantly reduced yield, while grazing by rabbits and hares surprisingly had no effect. Following the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy in 1992, the main effect of which was to change from a price support policy to direct payments to producers, farmers in the European Union who produce more than a specified tonnage of 'eligible crops' per year, are required to fallow a given percentage of their land (currently 5%), to qualify for Arable Area Payments. Growers can elect to fallow fields on a rotational basis, or permanently. Headland set-aside is a term used to describe strips of set-aside, a minimum of 20 m wide around the edges of fields. In these experiments, the headland effect did not extend beyond 20 m from the field edge. Therefore, particularly in fields with boundary hedges or trees, headland set-aside could effectively remove the poor-yielding area at the field margin.
引用
收藏
页码:129 / 142
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Effect of potassium fertilizer on the yield, quality and potassium offtake of sugar beet crops grown on soils of different potassium status
    Milford, GFJ
    Armstrong, MJ
    Jarvis, PJ
    Houghton, BJ
    Bellett-Travers, DM
    Jones, J
    Leigh, RA
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2000, 135 : 1 - 10
  • [32] EFFECT OF GROWING AREA AND HARVESTING DATE ON YIELD OF SUGAR-BEET AND REFINED SUGAR OF SOME SUGAR-BEET VARIETIES
    STANACEV, S
    STEFANOVIC, D
    SUBOTIC, B
    ARHIV ZA POLJOPRIVREDNE NAUKE, 1977, 30 (112): : 35 - 52
  • [33] Effect of long-term sugar beet cultivation on rhizosphere bacterial diversity, community structure and sugar yield of sugar beet
    Du, Jiyu
    Song, Baiquan
    Jia, Qiue
    Liu, Shangxuan
    Li, Xingfan
    Liu, Huajun
    Huang, Wengong
    RHIZOSPHERE, 2022, 22
  • [34] Effect of chosen cultural factors on the yield and quality of sugar beet
    Urban, J
    Pulkràbek, J
    Jozefyová, L
    Sroller, J
    LISTY CUKROVARNICKE A REPARSKE, 2004, 120 (02): : 39 - 42
  • [35] EFFECT OF ZINC ON YIELD AND TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY OF SUGAR-BEET
    ZAVREL, V
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1978, 24 (09): : 949 - 958
  • [36] EFFECT OF SLIGHT ATTACKS OF VIRUS YELLOWS ON SUGAR BEET YIELD
    VANSTEYV.L
    IIRB, 1966, 1 (03): : 149 - &
  • [37] EFFECT OF PLANT POPULATION ON THE YIELD OF SUGAR-BEET AS AN INTERCROP
    DEOL, DS
    BAINS, BS
    KANWAR, RS
    INTERNATIONAL SUGAR JOURNAL, 1978, 80 (960): : 355 - 357
  • [38] THE EFFECT OF UREA ON THE NUTRITION, YIELD AND QUALITY OF SUGAR-BEET
    STRNAD, P
    ROSTLINNA VYROBA, 1982, 28 (11): : 1171 - 1176
  • [39] EFFECT OF STIMULATION ON THE YIELD AND TECHNOLOGICAL VALUE OF SUGAR BEET ROOTS
    Prosba-Bialczyk, Urszula
    Szajsner, Hanna
    Bak, Krzysztof
    SEED AND SEEDLINGS X: SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNICAL SEMINAR, 2011, : 195 - 202
  • [40] EFFECT OF FOLIAR PREPARATIONS AND VARIETY ON SUGAR BEET YIELD AND QUALITY
    Feckova, Jana
    Pacuta, Vladimir
    Cerny, Ivan
    JOURNAL OF CENTRAL EUROPEAN AGRICULTURE, 2005, 6 (03): : 295 - 303