Should Rib Fracture Patients be Treated at High Acuity Trauma Hospitals?

Background: It is well known that severely injured trauma patients have better outcomes when treated at centers that routinely treat high acuity trauma. The benefits of specialty treatment for chest trauma have not been shown. We hypothesized that patients with high risk rib fractures treated in centers that care for high acuity trauma would have better out-comes than patients treated in other centers. Methods: All rib fracture patients were identified via the 2016 National Inpatient Sample using ICD-10 codes; Abbreviated Injury Scales (AIS) and Elixhauser comorbidity scores were also extracted. Chest AIS was grouped as mild ( < 1) or severe ( > 2). All patients with AIS > 2 in another body region were excluded. High acuity trauma hospitals (TH) were defined as hospitals which transferred 0% of neurotrauma patients; all other hospitals were de -fined as non-trauma hospitals. Poor outcome was defined as any patient who died, had a tracheostomy, developed pneumonia, or had a length of stay in the longest decile. Logistic regression with an interaction term for hospital type and chest trauma severity was per -formed. Results: A total of 29,780 patients with rib fractures were identified (median age 64 (IQR 51-79), 60% male), of whom 22% had poor outcomes. Fifty-three percent of patients were treated at non-trauma hospitals. In unadjusted comparisons, poor outcomes occurred more often at TH (22.4% versus 21.4%, P = 0.03). However, after adjustment, severe chest trauma that was treated at non-trauma hospitals was associated with higher odds of poor outcomes (OR 1.6, < 0.001). Discussion: More than 20% of patients with severe chest trauma have a poor outcome. Severe chest trauma outcomes are improved at TH. Development of transfer criteria for chest injuries in high-risk patients may mitigate poor outcomes at hospitals without specialized trauma expertise. (c) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.