Risks and Function of Breast Cancer Susceptibility Alleles

被引:14
|
作者
Torabi Dalivandan, Saeideh [1 ]
Plummer, Jasmine [1 ]
Gayther, Simon A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cedars Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Sci, Ctr Bioinformat & Funct Genom, Los Angeles, CA 90048 USA
关键词
breast cancer risk; GWAS; subtype-specific risk; functional genomics; clinical genetic testing; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION; BRCA2 MUTATION CARRIERS; GENETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; CONFER SUSCEPTIBILITY; IDENTIFIES MULTIPLE; GERMLINE MUTATIONS; MEDICAL GENETICS; AMERICAN-COLLEGE; COMMON VARIANTS; FAMILY-HISTORY;
D O I
10.3390/cancers13163953
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Population-based genetic risk stratification and detection of early-stage breast cancers will improve approaches to prevent and reduce disease-associated mortalities. In this review, we summarize the latest discoveries in breast cancer susceptibility genetics and propose how these findings can be applied in the clinical arena to improve risk prediction and prevention of breast cancer. We also review the latest approaches and progress aimed at elucidating the functional consequences of both high and moderate penetrance genetic variation, which tend to lie in the protein coding regions of breast cancer susceptibility genes, and common low penetrance breast cancer risk alleles which tend to lie in non-protein coding DNA regions and affect gene regulation. For non-coding risk variation, there is no genetic code to interpret the function of common risk allele; and so, we provide the reader with an illustration of the step-by-step methods to understand their functional impact on breast cancer disease biology. Family history remains one of the strongest risk factors for breast cancer. It is well established that women with a first-degree relative affected by breast cancer are twice as likely to develop the disease themselves. Twins studies indicate that this is most likely due to shared genetics rather than shared epidemiological/lifestyle risk factors. Linkage and targeted sequencing studies have shown that rare high- and moderate-penetrance germline variants in genes involved in the DNA damage response (DDR) including BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, ATM, and TP53 are responsible for a proportion of breast cancer cases. However, breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease, and there is now strong evidence that different risk alleles can predispose to different subtypes of breast cancer. Here, we review the associations between the different genes and subtype-specificity of breast cancer based on the most comprehensive genetic studies published. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have also been used to identify an additional hereditary component of breast cancer, and have identified hundreds of common, low-penetrance susceptibility alleles. The combination of these low penetrance risk variants, summed as a polygenic risk score (PRS), can identify individuals across the spectrum of disease risk. However, there remains a substantial bottleneck between the discovery of GWAS-risk variants and their contribution to tumorigenesis mainly because the majority of these variants map to the non-protein coding genome. A range of functional genomic approaches are needed to identify the causal risk variants and target susceptibility genes and establish their underlying role in disease biology. We discuss how the application of these multidisciplinary approaches to understand genetic risk for breast cancer can be used to identify individuals in the population that may benefit from clinical interventions including screening for early detection and prevention, and treatment strategies to reduce breast cancer-related mortalities.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Breast cancer susceptibility variants alter risks in familial disease
    Latif, Ayse
    Hadfield, Kristen D.
    Roberts, Stephen A.
    Shenton, Andrew
    Lalloo, Fiona
    Black, Graeme C. M.
    Howell, Anthony
    Evans, D. Gareth
    Newman, William G.
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2010, 47 (02) : 126 - 131
  • [2] Breast cancer susceptibility alleles and ovarian cancer risk in 2 study populations
    Gates, Margaret A.
    Tworoger, Shellev S.
    Terry, Kathryn L.
    De Vivo, Immaculata
    Hunter, David J.
    Hankinson, Susan E.
    Cramer, Daniel W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 124 (03) : 729 - 733
  • [3] Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with female breast cancer susceptibility in Chinese population
    Jia, Ziqi
    Huang, Yansong
    Liu, Jiaqi
    Liu, Gang
    Li, Jiayi
    Xu, Hengyi
    Jiang, Yiwen
    Zhang, Song
    Wang, Yidan
    Chen, Gang
    Qiao, Guangdong
    Li, Yalun
    GENE, 2023, 884
  • [4] Association between 15 known or potential breast cancer susceptibility genes and breast cancer risks in Chinese women
    Fu, Fenfen
    Zhang, Dongjie
    Hu, Li
    Sundaram, Senthil
    Ying, Dingge
    Zhang, Ying
    Fu, Shuna
    Zhang, Juan
    Yao, Lu
    Xu, Ye
    Xie, Yuntao
    CANCER BIOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2022, 19 (02) : 253 - +
  • [5] Evaluating 17 breast cancer susceptibility loci in the Nashville breast health study
    Han, Mi-Ryung
    Deming-Halverson, Sandra
    Cai, Qiuyin
    Wen, Wanqing
    Shrubsole, Martha J.
    Shu, Xiao-Ou
    Zheng, Wei
    Long, Jirong
    BREAST CANCER, 2015, 22 (05) : 544 - 551
  • [6] Clinical implications of low-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility alleles
    Francis Freisinger
    Susan M. Domchek
    Current Oncology Reports, 2009, 11 : 8 - 14
  • [7] Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer: current state-of-the-art
    Ghoussaini, Maya
    Pharoah, Paul D. P.
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2009, 5 (05) : 689 - 701
  • [8] Clinical Implications of Low-Penetrance Breast Cancer Susceptibility Alleles
    Freisinger, Francis
    Domchek, Susan M.
    CURRENT ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2009, 11 (01) : 8 - 14
  • [9] Functional mechanisms underlying pleiotropic risk alleles at the 19p13.1 breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility locus
    Lawrenson, Kate
    Kar, Siddhartha
    McCue, Karen
    Kuchenbaeker, Karoline
    Michailidou, Kyriaki
    Tyrer, Jonathan
    Beesley, Jonathan
    Ramus, Susan J.
    Li, Qiyuan
    Delgado, Melissa K.
    Lee, Janet M.
    Aittomaki, Kristiina
    Andrulis, Irene L.
    Anton-Culver, Hoda
    Arndt, Volker
    Arun, Banu K.
    Arver, Brita
    Bandera, Elisa V.
    Barile, Monica
    Barkardottir, Rosa B.
    Barrowdale, Daniel
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Benitez, Javier
    Berchuck, Andrew
    Bisogna, Maria
    Bjorge, Line
    Blomqvist, Carl
    Blot, William
    Bogdanova, Natalia
    Bojesen, Anders
    Bojesen, Stig E.
    Bolla, Manjeet K.
    Bonanni, Bernardo
    Borresen-Dale, Anne-Lise
    Brauch, Hiltrud
    Brennan, Paul
    Brenner, Hermann
    Bruinsma, Fiona
    Brunet, Joan
    Buhari, Shaik Ahmad
    Burwinkel, Barbara
    Butzow, Ralf
    Buys, Saundra S.
    Cai, Qiuyin
    Caldes, Trinidad
    Campbell, Ian
    Canniotto, Rikki
    Chang-Claude, Jenny
    Chiquette, Jocelyne
    Choi, Ji-Yeob
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2016, 7
  • [10] Breast Cancer Risks and Risk Prediction Models
    Engel, Christoph
    Fischer, Christine
    BREAST CARE, 2015, 10 (01) : 7 - 12