New convolutional differentiator method and 2.5-D seismic waves modeling

被引:0
作者
Cheng, Bingjie [1 ]
Li, Xiaofan [1 ]
Xu, Tianji [1 ]
机构
[1] SINOPEC, SW Branch Co, Mobile Postdoctoral Ctr, Chengdu 610081, Sichuan, Peoples R China
来源
NEAR-SURFACE GEOPHYSICS AND HUMAN ACTIVITY | 2008年
关键词
convolutional differentiator; staggered-grid finite-difference; 2.5-D; inhomogeneous media; seismic wave field; numerical modeling;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
For improving the precision and efficiency of seismic modeling, one aim of this paper is to develop a generalized and high precision forward method. The authors introduce convolutional Forsyte polynomial differentiator to calculate the spatial derivative of seismic wave equation, and apply the time staggered grid finite-difference which can better meet the high precision of the convolutional differentiator to substitute the conventional finite-difference to calculate the time derivative of seismic wave equation, then creating a new forward method to modeling the wave-field in complex inhomogeneous media. Another aim of this paper is to study 2.5 dimension (2.5-D) seismic wave-field. The authors apply CFPD method to simulate the seismic wave-field in 2.5-D inhomogeneous media. The results indicate that 2.5-D numerical modeling is efficient to simulate one of the sections of 3D media, and 2.5-D calculation is much less time-consuming than 3D calculation. The theory and computation example of 2.5-D seismic wave field mentioned in this paper prove that the new algorithm can efficiently calculate the seismic wave-field in complex media. Proposing and developing this new forward method can provide more choices to study the seismic wave-field modeling, seismic wave migration, seismic inversion, and seismic wave imaging.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 194
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
ALTERMAN Z, 1968, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V58, P367
[2]   THE SOLUTION OF THE STATIONARY ELECTRIC-FIELD STRENGTH AND POTENTIAL OF A POINT CURRENT SOURCE IN A 21/2-DIMENSIONAL ENVIRONMENT [J].
ESKOLA, L ;
HONGISTO, H .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 1981, 29 (02) :260-273
[3]   2.5D modelling, inversion and angle migration in anisotropic elastic media [J].
Foss, SK ;
Ursin, B .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2004, 52 (01) :65-84
[4]   2.5-D modelling of elastic waves using the pseudospectral method [J].
Furumura, T ;
Takenaka, H .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 124 (03) :820-832
[5]   MODELING OF THE ACOUSTIC-WAVE EQUATION WITH TRANSFORM METHODS [J].
GAZDAG, J .
GEOPHYSICS, 1981, 46 (06) :854-859
[6]  
Jose M., 2002, GEOPHYSICS, V67, P1304
[7]   2.5D finite-difference solution of the acoustic wave equation [J].
Novais, A ;
Santos, LT .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2005, 53 (04) :523-531
[8]  
SINCLAIR C, MODELLING ELASTIC WA
[9]   FREQUENCY-DOMAIN ACOUSTIC-WAVE MODELING AND INVERSION OF CROSSHOLE DATA .1. 2.5-D MODELING METHOD [J].
SONG, ZM ;
WILLIAMSON, PR .
GEOPHYSICS, 1995, 60 (03) :784-795
[10]   Effect of 2-D topography on the 3-D seismic wavefield using a 2.5-D discrete wavenumber-boundary integral equation method [J].
Takenaka, H ;
Kennett, BLN ;
Fujiwara, H .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1996, 124 (03) :741-755