Comparison of three neural network classifiers for aphasic and non-aphasic naming data

被引:0
|
作者
Jarvelin, Antti [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tampere, Dept Comp Sci, FIN-33014 Tampere, Finland
来源
HEALTHINF 2008: PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HEALTH INFORMATICS, VOL 2 | 2008年
关键词
neural networks; classification; aphasia; anomia; naming disorders;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This paper reports a comparison of three neural network models (Multi-Layer Perceptrons, Probabilistic Neural Networks, Self-Organizing Maps) for classifying naming data of aphasic and non-aphasic speakers. The neural network classifiers were tested with the artificial naming data generated from confrontation naming data of 23 aphasic patients and one averaged control subjet. The results show that one node MLP neural network performed best in the classification task, while the two other classifiers performed typically 1 - 2 % worse than the MLP classifier. Although the differences between the different classifier types were small, these results suggests that a simple one node MLP classifier should be preferred over more complex neural network classifiers when classifying naming data of aphasic and non-aphasic speakers.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 190
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A comparison of data preprocessing strategies for neural network modeling of oil production prediction
    Nguyen, HH
    Chan, CW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE THIRD IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE INFORMATICS, 2004, : 199 - 207
  • [32] Comparison of support vector machine, random forest and neural network classifiers for tree species classification on airborne hyperspectral APEX images
    Raczko, Edwin
    Zagajewski, Bogdan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 50 (01) : 144 - 154
  • [33] Enhancing Trip Distribution Prediction with Twitter Data: Comparison of Neural Network and Gravity Models
    Pourebrahim, Nastaran
    Sultana, Selima
    Thill, Jean-Claude
    Mohanty, Somya
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND ACM SIGSPATIAL INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON AI FOR GEOGRAPHIC KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY (GEOAI 2018), 2018, : 5 - 8
  • [34] Comparison of TSCS regression and neural network models for panel data forecasting: debt policy
    Pao, HT
    Chih, YY
    NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2006, 15 (02) : 117 - 123
  • [35] Real-time path planning in dynamic environments: A comparison of three neural network models
    Lebedev, DV
    Steil, JJ
    Ritter, H
    2003 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS, VOLS 1-5, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS, 2003, : 3408 - 3413
  • [36] Comparison of TSCS regression and neural network models for panel data forecasting: debt policy
    Hsiao-Tien Pao
    Yao-Yu Chih
    Neural Computing & Applications, 2006, 15 : 117 - 123
  • [37] On the neural network classification of medical data and an endeavour to balance non-uniform data sets with artificial data extension
    Autio, Lassi
    Juhola, Marta
    Laurikkala, Jorma
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2007, 37 (03) : 388 - 397
  • [38] A Comparison of Spectral Angle Mapper and Artificial Neural Network Classifiers Combined with Landsat TM Imagery Analysis for Obtaining Burnt Area Mapping
    Petropoulos, George P.
    Vadrevu, Krishna Prasad
    Xanthopoulos, Gavriil
    Karantounias, George
    Scholze, Marko
    SENSORS, 2010, 10 (03) : 1967 - 1985
  • [39] Comparison of two classifiers; K-nearest neighbor and artificial neural network, for fault diagnosis on a main engine journal-bearing
    Moosavian, A.
    Ahmadi, H.
    Tabatabaeefar, A.
    Khazaee, M.
    SHOCK AND VIBRATION, 2013, 20 (02) : 263 - 272
  • [40] Comparison of SOM and Conventional Neural Network Data Division for PV Reliability Power Prediction
    Pulipaka, Subrahmanyam
    Kumar, Rajneesh
    2017 1ST IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENVIRONMENT AND ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND 2017 17TH IEEE INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL POWER SYSTEMS EUROPE (EEEIC / I&CPS EUROPE), 2017,