The Use of the Braden Scale in Assessing Pressure Ulcers in Turkey A Systematic Review

被引:14
作者
Baris, Nuray [1 ]
Karabacak, Bilgi Gulseven [2 ]
Alpar, Sule Ecevit [2 ]
机构
[1] Isparta Mil Hosp, Isparta, Turkey
[2] Marmara Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Nursing, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
INTENSIVE-CARE UNITS; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY; SORE RISK; PREVENTION; PREVALENCE; SAMPLE;
D O I
10.1097/01.ASW.0000465299.99194.e6
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The goal of this systematic review was to reach scientific generalizations regarding the assessment of risk for pressure ulcers based on the results of previous studies that made use of the Braden Scale. DATA SOURCES: This research was performed by using a retrospective screening of studies relevant to the subject. In Turkey, the first validity and reliability study for the Braden Scale was performed by Oguz and Olgun in 1998. For this reason, the authors' research was conducted between March 2, 2012, and August 4, 2012, as a systematic review analysis by evaluating studies in Turkey that made use of the Braden Scale between 1998 and 2012. Screening was performed by using different combinations of 8 keywords in Turkish and English to scan a total of 10 national and international databases. A total of 2375 studies were evaluated, and 16 studies were included and considered within the context of this research. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: It was determined that the studies considered within the context of the current research were conducted between 1998 and 2012; 5 of these studies were experimental and 11 were descriptive; the sample size varied between 22 and 422; the majority were performed in intensive care units; and the study samples were mostly composed of patients. The Braden Scale was used in these studies for forming samples by identifying high-risk patients. Two studies evaluated the reliability of the Braden Scale, whereas 7 other studies calculated the reliability coefficient. Only 1 study included results for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (which represent the predictive criteria of assessment tools). Four studies indicated cutoff values, which varied between 14 and 18. A general evaluation of these studies' results revealed limited evidence of effective risk assessment by the Braden Scale.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 357
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Evaluation by Patients and Caregivers of the Effectiveness of a Brochure Developed to Prevent Pressure Ulcers [J].
Akkuzu, Guelcihan ;
Arslantas, Seda ;
Kosker, S. Bilge ;
Sen, Secil .
JOURNAL OF WOUND OSTOMY AND CONTINENCE NURSING, 2009, 36 (06) :610-615
[2]  
[Anonymous], SYST REV CRD GUID UN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: Quick reference guide
[4]  
Ayello EA, 2006, ANN LONG TERM CARE C, V14, P46
[5]  
Ayello Elizabeth A, 2002, Adv Skin Wound Care, V15, P125, DOI 10.1097/00129334-200205000-00008
[6]  
Bakanolu E., 2010, THESIS ISTANBUL U IS
[7]   Predicting pressure ulcer risk - A multisite study of the predictive validity of the Braden Scale [J].
Bergstrom, N ;
Braden, B ;
Kemp, M ;
Champagne, M ;
Ruby, E .
NURSING RESEARCH, 1998, 47 (05) :261-269
[8]  
BERGSTROM N, 1987, NURS CLIN N AM, V22, P417
[9]  
Bluestein D, 2008, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V78, P1186
[10]   PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY OF THE BRADEN-SCALE FOR PRESSURE SORE RISK IN A NURSING-HOME POPULATION [J].
BRADEN, BJ ;
BERGSTROM, N .
RESEARCH IN NURSING & HEALTH, 1994, 17 (06) :459-470